Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone seen a paint chip of Greenstone/Forest yet, or know when those chips will be available?  Just curious to see what shade of green it is.  An emerald or darker green metallic (black with green metallic flakes) would definitely appeal to me, but a brighter green would not.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/14/2021 at 12:58 PM, Cody Stevenson said:

Following. I've ordered a Chev in the Greenstone Metallic. It's like waiting to see what sex the baby is going to be!

 

So you ordered your truck in that color sight unseen!!??  Wow, you are a brave man!  I am anxious to hear what your thoughts are on it when you get it and see it for the first time.

Posted (edited)

Its not dark like 2015 Silverado green.  Its similar to Steel Green Metallic off of a 2011 Silverado but darker than that a bit.

 

Here's Steel Green from 2011:

 

dsgf.jpg.9ca09e498a88a8ec56dcba5c005833ef.jpg

Edited by newdude
Posted

Hmmm.  Looks almost like a black/olive blend.  Ram is also using olive, but a much more traditional shade.  Not quite what I was expecting/hoping.

Posted (edited)

Where did that picture come from?  22s aren't being built yet?

 

-Eli

Edited by Tjeli
Posted

Production started July 12, according to the large fleet management companies.  Wouldn't surprise me that they'd build some Greenstone trucks for press/media/publicity purposes.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

My neighbor just got a greenstone colored 2022.....maybe it is because I am a professional painter, but the metallic is blotchy and mottled...the owner probably is so excited to have a new pickup he probably hasn’t noticed yet...body shops are gonna hate this color

Edited by RattleCanDan
added contest

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,173 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...