Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
30 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

You guys think a 2014 Silverado 1500 LTZ with 190k miles for 17k is a good buy??

I wouldn’t do it. I paid 27K for my loaded Texas edition new. And paid 6K for my 02 z-66 Avalanche. With 168K. It’s a cream puff. I’d keep looking.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I wouldn’t do it. I paid 27K for my loaded Texas edition new. And paid 6K for my 02 z-66 Avalanche. With 168K. It’s a cream puff. I’d keep looking.

Why would you not? Too many miles? This is my first truck btw

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

Why would you not? Too many miles? This is my first truck btw

Too many miles. Every truck is inflated because of shortages. Look up potential problems with 14 Chevy trucks. If you can handle potential repairs that may arise  go for it. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Too many miles. Every truck is inflated because of shortages. Look up potential problems with 14 Chevy trucks. If you can handle potential repairs that may arise  go for it. 

Would you say it’s priced to high? Cause it was originally at 18,500 and they dropped it down to 17k 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

Would you say it’s priced to high? Cause it was originally at 18,500 and they dropped it down to 17k 

Welcome to the site.

 

Do you have a link to where the truck is being sold? 

You have not given a lot of information about the rig.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

Would you say it’s priced to high? Cause it was originally at 18,500 and they dropped it down to 17k 

You obviously want it, go for it. And engine for that truck is 12-14 installed. Cylinder deactivation on those is a crap shoot. GM has already changed how that works. I wouldn’t buy a engine with that regardless of the mileage. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

Welcome to the site.

 

Do you have a link to where the truck is being sold? 

You have not given a lot of information about the rig.

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/165945472123462/?ref=search&referral_code=marketplace_search&referral_story_type=post&tracking=browse_serp%3A8fe8b94c-2899-4788-b76d-4e911615ad06 Not really any info on it, went to look at it today everything seems fine, its well maintained, it’s LTZ but it’s 2x4

Posted
12 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/165945472123462/?ref=search&referral_code=marketplace_search&referral_story_type=post&tracking=browse_serp%3A8fe8b94c-2899-4788-b76d-4e911615ad06 Not really any info on it, went to look at it today everything seems fine, its well maintained, it’s LTZ but it’s 2x4

Not a bad looking truck.

 

Price seems to be in line, lower than other trucks because of miles and just 2WD.

Have you had a chance to drive it? Any records available? They list it as a one owner.

Posted
9 minutes ago, JimCost2014 said:

Not a bad looking truck.

 

Price seems to be in line, lower than other trucks because of miles and just 2WD.

Have you had a chance to drive it? Any records available? They list it as a one owner.

Gonna test drive tomorrow and they showed us proof of the clean title and yeah it’s 1 owner I’m pretty sure

Posted
8 minutes ago, Jesusgalmiche said:

Gonna test drive tomorrow and they showed us proof of the clean title and yeah it’s 1 owner I’m pretty sure

Report back with some pictures if you buy it.

 

Good luck!

Posted

Today's low vehicle supply not-with-standing, $17k for a nearly 200k mile 2wd truck seems crazy.  If this is being financed, you'll likely be paying it off long after the vehicle has reached its end of life.  It *looks* nice, but looks can be deceiving; my friend started a simple tune-up on a customer's '75 Beetle Convertible with perfect paint that turned into a full blown restoration after he found that the heater channels were 2x4s glassed into place, and the "new" floor pans weren't even riveted into place, they were siliconed!  At that mileage, you're looking at wear on every moving part: engine, transmission, axles, differential, suspension... so you'd better plan to have several grand on the side for immediate repairs.  For perspective, I purchased my 2016 over 2 years ago as a CPO for $24.5k with 70k miles.

 

KBB puts that truck between $10-14.5k.  Closer to 10 seems more accurate, I've seen 4x4 trucks with half the mileage (of all brands) on CL in that price range.  Do you *need* a full size truck, or will a mid-size do the job?  You may or may not be able to find one in that size for cheaper; unless you need the tow capacity of a full-size, a mid-size is a much more convenient truck to drive/park every day IMO.

Posted

You're money, but I would pass.

Unless you're in need of a truck right now wait.

Posted
30 minutes ago, 16LT4 said:

Today's low vehicle supply not-with-standing, $17k for a nearly 200k mile 2wd truck seems crazy.  If this is being financed, you'll likely be paying it off long after the vehicle has reached its end of life.  It *looks* nice, but looks can be deceiving; my friend started a simple tune-up on a customer's '75 Beetle Convertible with perfect paint that turned into a full blown restoration after he found that the heater channels were 2x4s glassed into place, and the "new" floor pans weren't even riveted into place, they were siliconed!  At that mileage, you're looking at wear on every moving part: engine, transmission, axles, differential, suspension... so you'd better plan to have several grand on the side for immediate repairs.  For perspective, I purchased my 2016 over 2 years ago as a CPO for $24.5k with 70k miles.

 

KBB puts that truck between $10-14.5k.  Closer to 10 seems more accurate, I've seen 4x4 trucks with half the mileage (of all brands) on CL in that price range.  Do you *need* a full size truck, or will a mid-size do the job?  You may or may not be able to find one in that size for cheaper; unless you need the tow capacity of a full-size, a mid-size is a much more convenient truck to drive/park every day IMO.

My brother in law is a long haul GM truck and suv owner. He buys CPOS mostly. Usually the wife drives them first to about 200K. Then he drives them. The newest one gets the bulk, trips etc. 200k to 300k is a crapshoot. In reality 150K up. All his looked good. Add in all the electronics, cylinder deactivation. It’s just more to go wrong. Look up the most reliable on the net. Newer GMs are out of the top ten. With the tundra at number 1 for full size. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...