Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi i have a 2021 sierra 3500 4x4 diesel with the snow prep package. My truck rides really stiff and im used to drive hd truck even though ive never owned one before. My friends f350 rides so much softer than mine. Anyways i wanted to soften the from suspension a little. Its hard to find info on torsion bars. From my understanding the snowprep package comes with heavier torsion bars. The part number on it for left side is 84745489. When i put that on gmc parts it says its for a 2wd truck. Weird. Wanted to know if anyone knows if the torsion bars for the 3500 and the 2500 was the same. Cognito make a softer rate torsion bar but its for all trucks 2500 and 3500 gas and diesel. Im afraid if i change to that it might be too soft. Now if the 3500 and the 2500 has different rates maybe i could go down to a 2500 spring rate. 
 

any help is appreciated. 

Posted (edited)

There are multiple part numbers and stiffnesses of torsion bars depending on the specific cab and bed, diesel vs gas, camper pkg, and snow plow package. There’s a table on line showing all the configurations. I’ll see if i can find it again. You should be able to contact an oem parts dealer and figure out the base torsion bars for your cab/bed/engine. On some of the configurations the camper pkg is one step up and the plow is another step up in stiffness and axle rating. Other configurations just go up the same one step for both options. If you feel your truck rides like a Ford, and if your truck is willing to forgive you for saying that, I recommend you back down to the base torsion spring even if it’s two steps. I have the camper package and, while it’s still a comfortable ride, it’s stiffer than I wanted for our lightweight slide in camper. I’m thinking of installing the base torsion springs. 

Edited by Another JR
Posted

In general, 2500 and 3500 srw torsion bars are the same for the same wheelbase and engine.  The diesel snow plow package only goes up one size whereas the gas plow prep goes anywhere from one to three sizes.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted
On 8/16/2021 at 1:58 PM, Another JR said:

There are multiple part numbers and stiffnesses of torsion bars depending on the specific cab and bed, diesel vs gas, camper pkg, and snow plow package. There’s a table on line showing all the configurations. I’ll see if i can find it again. You should be able to contact an oem parts dealer and figure out the base torsion bars for your cab/bed/engine. On some of the configurations the camper pkg is one step up and the plow is another step up in stiffness and axle rating. Other configurations just go up the same one step for both options. If you feel your truck rides like a Ford, and if your truck is willing to forgive you for saying that, I recommend you back down to the base torsion spring even if it’s two steps. I have the camper package and, while it’s still a comfortable ride, it’s stiffer than I wanted for our lightweight slide in camper. I’m thinking of installing the base torsion springs. 

 

Hey JR, if you can find that table with the torsion bars I would really appreciate it!  That's because I am getting impatient waiting for my order to get picked up and keep looking online for something close to what I'm trying to order.  There are many trucks that are close but many of them have the snow plow/camper package and I would love to see how far those torsion bars are from the regular bars on a '22 3500HD crew cab SRW gasser.  Thanks!

Posted
On 8/16/2021 at 1:58 PM, Another JR said:

There are multiple part numbers and stiffnesses of torsion bars depending on the specific cab and bed, diesel vs gas, camper pkg, and snow plow package. There’s a table on line showing all the configurations. I’ll see if i can find it again. You should be able to contact an oem parts dealer and figure out the base torsion bars for your cab/bed/engine. On some of the configurations the camper pkg is one step up and the plow is another step up in stiffness and axle rating. Other configurations just go up the same one step for both options. If you feel your truck rides like a Ford, and if your truck is willing to forgive you for saying that, I recommend you back down to the base torsion spring even if it’s two steps. I have the camper package and, while it’s still a comfortable ride, it’s stiffer than I wanted for our lightweight slide in camper. I’m thinking of installing the base torsion springs. 

if you can find the table that would be awesome.  i looked the part number for my torsion bar and it says its for a 2wd gas.  my truck is 4wd diesel. i could not find any info on what the stiffness of the oem torsion bars are.  it would be nice to know how i can step down. people at the dealer are so dumb. you try to explain what you want, and first they dont know the answer and second they say you cannot change the torsion bar to something different from what the truck came with.

 

Posted

I spent some time trying find it again via web search last night.   No luck. I know I posted a link to it in a previous string, so I’ll look at my posting history next. 
 

I don’t remember the table showing part numbers - just axle ratings with the various configurations and options, which told you how many 400 lb steps you were above the base suspension for your configuration for the camper and plow options.  

Posted

4400 FGAWR 84745473/5

4800 FGAWR 84745477/9

5200 FGAWR 84745481/3

5600 FGAWR 84745485/7

6000 FGAWR 84745489/91

 

In general, diesel crew cab sb 4wd are 5600 FGAWR and gas crew cab sb 4wd are 4800 FGAWR without heavy front or snow plow options.

 

If you have any other models, I can look up when I have time.  

 

#iworkforGM 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Another JR said:

I spent some time trying find it again via web search last night.   No luck. I know I posted a link to it in a previous string, so I’ll look at my posting history next. 
 

I don’t remember the table showing part numbers - just axle ratings with the various configurations and options, which told you how many 400 lb steps you were above the base suspension for your configuration for the camper and plow options.  

 

JR, thanks for investing the time to look for it.  Too bad GM doesn't make it easier to find.  Build and price for the '22 2500s gives the option for a "heavy duty front spring/camper package" and for the 3500s you can choose the same package or you can choose a "snow plow prep/camper package" and that one does list "heavy duty front springs" as included but none of the three give you any indication how heavy duty they are or especially how much over stock they are rated.  I thought I could find a clue in the 149 page 2022 GMC standard equipment and options document (pdf saved on my computer) but it was vague as well.  

Posted (edited)
On 8/16/2021 at 10:35 AM, doidera00 said:

Hi i have a 2021 sierra 3500 4x4 diesel with the snow prep package. My truck rides really stiff and im used to drive hd truck even though ive never owned one before. My friends f350 rides so much softer than mine. Anyways i wanted to soften the from suspension a little. Its hard to find info on torsion bars. From my understanding the snowprep package comes with heavier torsion bars. The part number on it for left side is 84745489. When i put that on gmc parts it says its for a 2wd truck. Weird. Wanted to know if anyone knows if the torsion bars for the 3500 and the 2500 was the same. Cognito make a softer rate torsion bar but its for all trucks 2500 and 3500 gas and diesel. Im afraid if i change to that it might be too soft. Now if the 3500 and the 2500 has different rates maybe i could go down to a 2500 spring rate. 
 

any help is appreciated. 

 

Looking at what MTU just posted and comparing to your part number you have the baddest bad boy of the bunch!  6k lbs!  Guess when they combine the heavy diesel and the snow plow prep you deserve the best!  All kidding aside, and not trying to insult your intelligence at all, have you checked the air pressure in your front tires?  Maybe it's crazy high from the dealership.  Even if its not too high try turning it down to 45 or 50 or something like that.  It will make a noticeable difference.  I have a '15 2500HD with the snow plow prep and the ride is entirely different at 60 vs 50 psi in front.  I might take a little hit to the mpg but I don't care.  I adjust mine back up when towing my camper but for daily driving I adjust the front and rears down and it turns it into a different truck.  Give it a shot if you haven't yet.

Edited by 03 Cobra
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 03 Cobra said:

 

The F60 - heavy front suspension / camper raises your FGAWR by 400 lbs (next size up).

 

VYU - snow plow prep / camper raises your FGAWR to 5600 lbs on gas engines and 6000 lbs on diesel.

 

On a lot of 4wd diesel models, F60 and VYU get you the same suspension.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Edited by MTU Alum
Forum software sucks
Posted
50 minutes ago, MTU Alum said:

The F60 - heavy front suspension / camper raises your FGAWR by 400 lbs (next size up).

 

VYU - snow plow prep / camper raises your FGAWR to 5600 lbs on gas engines and 6000 lbs on diesel.

 

On a lot of 4wd diesel models, F60 and VYU get you the same suspension.  

 

#iworkforGM 

 

MTU, since you are our guy on the inside can you please sanity check this table I made?  It might help us bring everything together.

 

image.thumb.png.de919e8dfa7221f2b6c1b9260819039f.png

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, 03 Cobra said:

 

MTU, since you are our guy on the inside can you please sanity check this table I made?  It might help us bring everything together.

 

image.thumb.png.de919e8dfa7221f2b6c1b9260819039f.png

 

All gas are 5600 lbs with snow plow.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, MTU Alum said:

 

 

Copy that.  Here is the updated snow plow table with a standard springs table if you want to take a glance at that one too.

 

image.thumb.png.676902a2b50e34458c254f0b3131c5ef.png

Posted

MTU works for GM so his info should be solid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...