Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Going to add an intercooler (heat exchanger, aftercooler really doesn't matter what you want to call it that's not what the post is about). Option # 1 is to install an air to water intercooler kit that will bolt up about 80% complete but may need to modify one of the pipes. This kit is fairly expensive. Option # 2, which could be a more affordable option would be to add an air to air intercooler designed for the turbo diesel version.

 

My question regarding the air to air option is that I have no idea how different the versions are in front of the radiator. For example, I'm wondering if an aftermarket intercooler upgrade for the diesel would sit in front of the radiator just as it does on the diesel model or are there other components in the way/obstructing that are different? If this would work, the piping kit that comes with the intercooler looks like it would be able to pass through into the engine bay and I could use most of the piping and fabricate the rest. From what I can tell, the radiator is roughly the same width between the 5.3L and the 6.6L models. The 5.3 radiator is a little shorter than the 6.6 and there's a slight difference in thickness. The radiator outlet and inlet ports seem to be in the same spots.   

 

So I know this is a long shot, but if anyone knows if the front areas behind the bumpers are the same or very similar please let me know. I'm asking because I don't want to buy the air to air kit and then it's not even close. I know for a fact the air to water kit will work with minimal fabrication. The price difference is about $1k between the two before fabrication. The attached pics are for illustration. Vortech has the air to water kit for another discontinued model and the other pic is of an air to air set up for a diesel. Thanks!

01-04 Escalade_Denali Underhood.jpg

KIT-IC-DURAMAX66-16-CAR-7.png

Edited by rdy2rce
  • rdy2rce changed the title to 14+ Silverado Supercharged 5.3L looking to add an intercooler
Posted (edited)

I think the Air/water is more efficient, the stock supercharger from the boosted Camaro has all this stuff ready to go, you might want to just source the Camaro LT parts instead of aftermarket stuff, GM has better engineering IMO

 

I would add the larger MaxTow radiator, that comes on the 6.2 trucks, its thicker and will outperform the 5.3 radiator, also an oil cooler would be smart.. not sure but is there a way to add oil piston sprayers to the 5.3 from say the LT5 motor?

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)

Mushimoto makes an All alluminum high flow radiator, $1000. no plastic tanks on it which is nice if you need to repair it

 

if you use the 2500 HD front bumper this has more airflow to the radiator area also, but will cost more for the accessorie parts to make it work , unless you find one at a wrecker

Edited by pokismoki
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/2/2021 at 11:31 AM, pokismoki said:

I think the Air/water is more efficient, the stock supercharger from the boosted Camaro has all this stuff ready to go, you might want to just source the Camaro LT parts instead of aftermarket stuff, GM has better engineering IMO

 

I would add the larger MaxTow radiator, that comes on the 6.2 trucks, its thicker and will outperform the 5.3 radiator, also an oil cooler would be smart.. not sure but is there a way to add oil piston sprayers to the 5.3 from say the LT5 motor?

L83 has piston cooling jets..

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...