Jump to content

DFM and lifters question?

Jsd
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jsd New Member

Jsd

Posted
Posted

I wanted to know if anyone had any real data on the percentage of lifter failures on the 5.3 engine. I purchased a Range DFM delete a post about 4 miles to the gallon. That's about 100 miles for a tank of gas. I like how it drives, no hesitation and smoother overall but with fuel prices going up I wondered if I should just let the DMV do it's thing. Is there any real data out there? I know people have had trouble with their lifters but I know a couple of guys at work who haven't ever had a problem. I could pick any vehicle out there and find people who had problems. Is the failure rate that high or overblown? Anyone have any real info?

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

newdude
newdude

If counting 2014-2021 model year, we've done 11 lifter jobs involving AFM/DFM lifters from Jan 1st 2021 to current.  One of those wasn't an AFM failure, 2018 NYS Police truck that had a non active cyl

newdude
newdude

2.4 Equinox/Terrain pistons and timing chains blow the lifters out of the water for us in terms of # done/failures.  I know those have all sorts of special policies on them and what not for oil consum

Amcguy1970
Amcguy1970

The failure rate is in the decimal of a percent, for the few you hear about on the forums with how many members are on here and all the millions that have been sold it is probably like 0.01%. People n

Snakes709 Enthusiast

Snakes709

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jsd said:

I wanted to know if anyone had any real data on the percentage of lifter failures on the 5.3 engine. I purchased a Range DFM delete a post about 4 miles to the gallon. That's about 100 miles for a tank of gas. I like how it drives, no hesitation and smoother overall but with fuel prices going up I wondered if I should just let the DMV do it's thing. Is there any real data out there? I know people have had trouble with their lifters but I know a couple of guys at work who haven't ever had a problem. I could pick any vehicle out there and find people who had problems. Is the failure rate that high or overblown? Anyone have any real info?

The thing is you see posts about all the failures but you dont see all the posts with no failures. I am at 52,200kms and haven't had any issues

fatwhiteboy Enthusiast

fatwhiteboy

Posted
Posted

GM would squish any numbers out there.  I know 3 people that had lifter or cam failures but GM would not state that it was due to cylinder deactivation.  I saw about a 1 maybe 2 MPG drop with it off on the freeway, no difference at all in the city.  I think the start stop is more aggravating then the cylinder shut down.

Anacortes Army Guy Enthusiast

Anacortes Army Guy

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Snakes709 said:

The thing is you see posts about all the failures but you dont see all the posts with no failures. I am at 52,200kms and haven't had any issues

4 mpg?  While the Range Technology device will probably reduce your mpg's, it shouldn't be that bad.  Sounds like there's another issue with your truck that is resulting in such poor mileage.  I'd recommend disconnecting the device and see what your mileage is then.

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)

If counting 2014-2021 model year, we've done 11 lifter jobs involving AFM/DFM lifters from Jan 1st 2021 to current.  One of those wasn't an AFM failure, 2018 NYS Police truck that had a non active cylinder eat the crap out of the cam lobe.    

 

Of those 11, five of the trucks were built in the known production window.  One of them was a 2020, the rest 2021.  

 

So 5 out of probably 50-60 new trucks/SUVs we've sold this year (good ol chip shortage).  We see hundreds of 2014-2021s in every year, large majority have had no failures.  

 

(I included 2014-2021 in general because same lifter part # is still used to this day for the active lifter.)

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, newdude said:

If counting 2014-2021 model year, we've done 11 lifter jobs involving AFM/DFM lifters from Jan 1st 2021 to current.  One of those wasn't an AFM failure, 2018 NYS Police truck that had a non active cylinder eat the crap out of the cam lobe.    

 

Of those 11, five of the trucks were built in the known production window.  One of them was a 2020, the rest 2021.  

 

So 5 out of probably 50-60 new trucks/SUVs we've sold this year (good ol chip shortage).  We see hundreds of 2014-2021s in every year, large majority have had no failures.  

 

(I included 2014-2021 in general because same lifter part # is still used to this day for the active lifter.)

Wondering, do you have that rate of failure with any other part? 

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Wondering, do you have that rate of failure with any other part? 

 

 

2.4 Equinox/Terrain pistons and timing chains blow the lifters out of the water for us in terms of # done/failures.  I know those have all sorts of special policies on them and what not for oil consumption and the chains, but we were doing those more than anything else.  They've slowed down now, but they were bad.

 

2017-2020 various front drive crossovers and cars for shift to park warning.  Tons of the shifter filter harnesses, shift levers and now the new switch kit for it.  Its like two or three part #s for the shifter assemblies but they all use the same park position switch.  Equinox, Traverse, Acadia, Malibu, Volt and Terrain.  

 

2007-2012 3.6 V6 Traverse/Acadia/Enclave/CTS timing chains used to be a big thing back like 2009-2016.

 

We do AFM/DFM lifter failures, but in all honesty over the 12 years where I've been, there are many other GM failure issues we work on over those.  

Edited by newdude
  • Thanks 2
Amcguy1970 Enthusiast

Amcguy1970

Posted
Posted

The failure rate is in the decimal of a percent, for the few you hear about on the forums with how many members are on here and all the millions that have been sold it is probably like 0.01%. People need to stop asking questions that no one knows an exact answer to and stop reading too much in to the forums, it just makes a mountain out of a mole hill. Follow the maintenance schedule and chances are incredibly high you won't have an issue. If it were a bigger problem the 800k ish per year trucks GM has produced with these motors there would be a ton more complaints on here about them, but you hear of like 1 or 2 a month it seems...

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Bob Kellerman New Member

Bob Kellerman

Posted
Posted

my 2021rst lifter failure 9000 miles only pulled motorcycle on trailer 1 time dash lit up add trans fluid, service parking brake, service esc. not happy new truck.dealer sail lifters backordered

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

It took many years before the reality of the 5.7 diesel failure was realized. Usually the second or third owner was saddled with the expense. At least you put a gas engine in and get back on the road. They were easy to work on in comparison. The engines were plentiful. I did one in a weekend. Anyone who would buy a cylinder deactivation engine out of a salvage yard without doing a delete would be foolish. The whole ordeal would be expensive and out of reach for a second or third owner. 

AirForceAngler Enthusiast

AirForceAngler

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, newdude said:

If counting 2014-2021 model year, we've done 11 lifter jobs involving AFM/DFM lifters from Jan 1st 2021 to current.  One of those wasn't an AFM failure, 2018 NYS Police truck that had a non active cylinder eat the crap out of the cam lobe.    

 

Of those 11, five of the trucks were built in the known production window.  One of them was a 2020, the rest 2021.  

 

So 5 out of probably 50-60 new trucks/SUVs we've sold this year (good ol chip shortage).  We see hundreds of 2014-2021s in every year, large majority have had no failures.  

 

(I included 2014-2021 in general because same lifter part # is still used to this day for the active lifter.)

Thanks for posting this info.  I have a 2021 RST with the 6.2 that was made during the "bad" timeframe.  I have about 2400 miles on it with  no problems yet, even been pulling a 5,000# trailer frequently.  I'm aware it can happen and have a good dealership to work with if/when it does.  I just hope it doesn't happen when I'm halfway across the country pulling my little fishing boat!

Jsd New Member

Jsd

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Someone above misunderstood me about mileage. I was getting 21 mpg and after the Range delete it went to 17 mpg. 

AirForceAngler Enthusiast

AirForceAngler

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Jsd said:

Someone above misunderstood me about mileage. I was getting 21 mpg and after the Range delete it went to 17 mpg. 

That's still a huge drop in mileage.  I disabled the AFM in my 2016 Suburban and hardly noticed a change in MPG at all.  

Phantom 4D Enthusiast

Phantom 4D

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

2.4 Equinox/Terrain pistons and timing chains blow the lifters out of the water for us in terms of # done/failures.  I know those have all sorts of special policies on them and what not for oil consumption and the chains, but we were doing those more than anything else.  They've slowed down now, but they were bad.

 

2017-2020 various front drive crossovers and cars for shift to park warning.  Tons of the shifter filter harnesses, shift levers and now the new switch kit for it.  Its like two or three part #s for the shifter assemblies but they all use the same park position switch.  Equinox, Traverse, Acadia, Malibu, Volt and Terrain.  

 

2007-2012 3.6 V6 Traverse/Acadia/Enclave/CTS timing chains used to be a big thing back like 2009-2016.

 

We do AFM/DFM lifter failures, but in all honesty over the 12 years where I've been, there are many other GM failure issues we work on over those.  

My wife's Impala LTZ just turned 71,000. I hope I don't jinx it, but she has had few problems with it. I had a 2004 Silverado LT and had no issues. Sold it and bought a 2017 Silverado LT. Piece of junk transmission. So what is the "time frame" for the lifter issue? I have a 2019 Sierra SLT X31. Have a bit over 12,000 on the clock. Biggest problem so far is hard downshift to first when coming to a stop. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,965
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DaleB
    Newest Member
    DaleB
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,100 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Common Sense Assembly   Your driveline is forgiving of the occasional mistake. It will even often forgive the random serious blunder. But it will not forgive a continuous bad habit.      What? Not everything needs to be a five thousand word essay.       
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      We drove about 15 minute east today to visit a friend and saw a steep increase in price in the same county. About 50 cents a gallon steepper. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Sure about that? A degree wheel and a dial indicator would lower your degree of assurance in that statement. 😉    It why we have offset keys and dialable timing sprockets. Just say'n.... I've built a few and have never seen one "On the money". 
    • Chuck FB
      Tire psi

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I will admit I haven't experimented much with pressure drops beyond the numbers I put in and part of that is that the numbers I used are fairly low and then found out it would trigger regardless at that 35 psi. Having said that I had tried before had changed the placard pressures and being that I have a 1 ton set to 80 on the placard for the rear I believe it triggered close to 60, the front I don't recall now for sure but thought maybe it could get close to 45 from that factory 60 placard pressure. So I never did figure out if it was a number of psi from placard pressure to the alarm or a percentage of the total placard number as some figured it was like a 25% drop from placard pressure would trigger it. So as to try and answer your question, I believe I set the placard pressure on the front to 47 or so and while I run the front tires at 40, they have dipped below that some if its colder and I haven't put "winter air" in yet and never once have had the front alarm go off. I would say that the answer your looking for is no, that if you set your placard pressure to 45, you have a certain amount of room to drop below that pressure before the alarm will go off.    The pressures you decide to run in your truck, that ends up being what makes sense to you based on what your carrying in your truck or if towing, then have to bump them back up to something that will carry the load in the rear and the fronts typically left at the same pressure. It all comes down to that chart I put the link to and using an accurate roadside scale to be your guide, both unloaded and then loaded to know your minimum safe pressures.    I just wish GM would allow a person to change the readings for the tire pressures to the English system of pounds as I have to look at that goofy metric reading that will never ever jive in my head and will go over and change it just to figure out what they are if need be and then change it back. 
    • TrueBlue
      No Software Updates - Old Build

      By TrueBlue · Posted

      That part I understand, that the dealer can do it. But I'm not understanding why updates that were available to the truck since it left the factory, or the dealership originally, would not still be available to it without dealer intervention.   I'm thinking along the lines of recalls. They stay available until they are completed, regardless of whether they are in warranty or not, or in the hands of the original owner or not. Why not updates as well, especially since some of those can be safety related also?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...