Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Pryme said:

I’ve read some people having less than right U bolts. I wonder what the spec is for the torque settings on those nuts?

 

@newdude I bet has access to those torque specs?

 

newdude have you seen any trucks with random clunks as the truck goes around turns at low speeds and say over off camber turns into driveways etc?

 

14 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

I can't remember where the post is, this is where you shine bigtime because you save all of this stuff.  Anyhow one person was having clunking issues and took a pic of the U bolts on the springs.  I swear I could see light between the U bolt and the springs.  I'm wondering if maybe these U bolts aren't tightened to specs at the factory, or with the suspension settling in just a hundred miles or so they are loosening up.  All of this clunking noise has to have something to do with the either the springs attachment point or the U bolts.  I can't think of any other way this noise could be replicated.  What are your thoughts Pryme?

 

 

First Pass: 74 lb ft

Second Pass: Loosen 270 degrees

Third Pass: 74 lb ft

Final Pass: 175 - 185 degrees

Edited by newdude
  • Thanks 3
Posted
13 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

First Pass: 74 lb ft

Second Pass: Loosen 270 degrees

Third Pass: 74 lb ft

Final Pass: 175 - 185 degrees

Is this from the factory or is this what the people do at the dealerships?

Posted
8 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

Is this from the factory or is this what the people do at the dealerships?

I’m sure it’s from the factory manual. 
 

so it seems there is not an actual torque spec. Interesting that it requires the torque than lossening and retightening. 
 

maybe she just needs a good run out in rough terrain. Bring the ole girl out to a frozen corn field and send it. 
 

tyat should sort it all out haha. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

 

First Pass: 74 lb ft

Second Pass: Loosen 270 degrees

Third Pass: 74 lb ft

Final Pass: 175 - 185 degrees

Have you seen any reports of slow speed clunks or sounds under these trucks? And if so, what was it?

 

thanks!

Posted
11 hours ago, Pryme said:

...

maybe she just needs a good run out in rough terrain. Bring the ole girl out to a frozen corn field and send it. 
 

tyat should sort it all out haha. 

A frozen bean field, chasing a yote, will break her in too. Not enough snow for the snow mobile, but just right for the 2500 AT4. 20230104_102351.thumb.jpg.4dc9fb0c8ea996b4f6f794a39186c8a4.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/15/2023 at 1:29 AM, Jettech1 said:

Is this from the factory or is this what the people do at the dealerships?

 

That is the torque sequence from the service manual. 

 

On the assembly line things may be done differently and they achieve that final torque value with an automated torque device, or they may do it to a different spec and that's why the bulletin exists.  I can't be certain on that though.  

 

23 hours ago, Pryme said:

I’m sure it’s from the factory manual. 
 

so it seems there is not an actual torque spec. Interesting that it requires the torque than lossening and retightening. 
 

maybe she just needs a good run out in rough terrain. Bring the ole girl out to a frozen corn field and send it. 
 

tyat should sort it all out haha. 

 

That is the torque sequence from the service manual.  

 

23 hours ago, Pryme said:

Have you seen any reports of slow speed clunks or sounds under these trucks? And if so, what was it?

 

thanks!

 

We have had one HD for a clunk so far sadly.  Don't recall what we did with it.  

Edited by newdude
Posted
On 1/13/2023 at 7:52 AM, Gasman03 said:

I also recently purchased a 2023 2500HD AT4. I started hearing the noise in the rear of the truck before I put 100 miles on it. It is only noticeable with slow speed suspension rock or slightly cambered turns that produces undercarriage clunks. My truck is currently in the shop for the second time, with less than 500 miles on it. To state this is frustrating, is an understatement!

 

OK, so the clunking noise has disappeared with use.  Currently around 950 miles on unit.  Seemed to improve and go away at around 600 miles.  Definitely not something you want to hear out of a brand new truck.  YMMV

 

Now... if I could figure out how to keep the stupid lights from flashing every time the tailgate is opened.  Don't think the whole neighborhood should alerted to the fact that something was put into or taken out of the bed.  🙄

Posted
On 1/13/2023 at 9:04 AM, Pryme said:

In the shop twice for this clunk sound? Please keep us posted on what you find out. 

My local GMC Dealership went over the entire reared tightening everything to factory torque specs. For now it seems to have stopped making the sound. I will update if it returns.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gasman03 said:

My local GMC Dealership went over the entire reared tightening everything to factory torque specs. For now it seems to have stopped making the sound. I will update if it returns.

That’s encouraging news. Thanks

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 1/21/2023 at 3:27 PM, ttowntwostep said:

OK, so the clunking noise has disappeared with use.  Currently around 950 miles on unit.  Seemed to improve and go away at around 600 miles.  Definitely not something you want to hear out of a brand new truck.  YMMV

 

Now... if I could figure out how to keep the stupid lights from flashing every time the tailgate is opened.  Don't think the whole neighborhood should alerted to the fact that something was put into or taken out of the bed.  🙄

Follow up. I have to concur. My clunk seemed to dissipate somewhere after 600 miles. I’m currently 1050 and it seems to be gone now. Not sure why, but similar experience  to twostep 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 635 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...