Jump to content

Engine Coolant Sensor Part Number 5.3 liter

Cheverado
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cheverado Enthusiast

Cheverado

Posted
Posted

Anybody have the GM part number for this? all of the internet research that ive done yield about a dozen different AC Delco part numbers and few 8 digit GM part numbers. Am trying to avoid driving down to the stealership. Prior to the original sensor (the one with the white plastic connector) failing, my engine temp was typically around 200 degrees. I replaced it with an AC Delco 213-4514 (has black plastic connector) (per Amazon correct fitment) and my temp doesnt get over 180 degrees.  What temps are yall seeing please?

Cheverado Enthusiast

Cheverado

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 hours ago, txab said:

According to Rockauto you need 2134333, which has a white connector

Thanks even a blind squirrel finds a nut from time to time

F208F85F-2E34-4DAF-8872-C0FAA878CA52.png

Cheverado Enthusiast

Cheverado

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

That for sure fixed the problem. Running 200° Ish Again

Edited by Cheverado
Cheverado Enthusiast

Cheverado

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well after going to the store yesterday I noticed the temp fluctuating. Turns out the problem was the thermostat. Comes up to temp and stays there now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • PBNB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By PBNB · Posted

      Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • asilverblazer
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • asilverblazer
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      ... I don't think he could.
    • asilverblazer
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • Atlas
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By Atlas · Posted

      I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...