Jump to content

Any Data on L83 5.3 Reliability After Lifter Failure and Replacement With and Without Range Delete?

20151500SLT

By 20151500SLT
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

 Share

Recommended Posts

20151500SLT Enthusiast

20151500SLT

Posted
Posted

Howdy everyone. About two months ago I had the dreaded AFM lifter failure on a 2015 Sierra 1500 SLT L83 with only 55,000 miles. Number 7 exhaust stuck, but there was no camshaft damage thankfully. Price to replace both banks (was advised by the foreman that this was the way to go) and the manifold was $5400. GM was "nice" enough to pay 38% of this, bringing my price to $3400. They also didn't have any of the manifolds in the entire country at the time, so my truck sat in a dealer bay for one month. The work came with a two year warranty for this issue.

 

Anyway, I have been driving it and it is mechanically fine now (the radio screen is doing the glitchy channel/screen changing business, but I guess that is for another thread). The dealer shop foreman advised that he had done about 50 of these in the last 7 years. In fact, mine was not the only one sitting in there waiting for a manifold. He advised the Range AFM delete and running 5w30 oil instead of the manufacturer recommended 0w20. He said that the Range delete should stop the AFM lifters from actuating as long as the module is plugged in, and that although it would not technically stop failure of a non afm lifter, these failures were much less common than the AFM lifter failures. 

 

I have not yet bought the Range module. I really like the truck, but don't want to be responsible for a $8000 repair two years from now if another lifter takes a dump and takes the camshaft with them. I don't think GM will help much, if at all at that time. I am wondering if anyone with intimate understanding of the issue can comment as to the reliability post repair if the Range AFM disabler is used.

 

I would like to continue to drive the truck but am getting tired of pissing away money at it. In the last six months I have had this, the known AC coolant leak, the brakes needed replacing, and now after picking the truck up last month the screen is acting glitchy and will be $1300 to replace it with no guarantee that it will fix it for good.

  • Sad 1
pokismoki Senior Enthusiast

pokismoki

Posted
Posted

main reason for failure is probably not changing your oil at 3-4000 miles and high engine temps, and using cheap mixed synthetic oil

 

you can also drive in 5th gear this will disable the v4 mode

  • Like 1
20151500SLT Enthusiast

20151500SLT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 12:04 PM, pokismoki said:

main reason for failure is probably not changing your oil at 3-4000 miles and high engine temps, and using cheap mixed synthetic oil

 

you can also drive in 5th gear this will disable the v4 mode

First, no. I'm not going to debate oil change intervals with you, but there is no benefit to changing your oil much sooner than needed. No, I also don't use shitty oil and the engine is not dogged. If you understood this issue, you'd understand that it has been happening to some engines before their second oil change. While not changing oil can certainly predispose to the issue, not changing your oil too soon is not going to cause it.

 

Second, I am aware of this.

  • Haha 1
20151500SLT Enthusiast

20151500SLT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 11:08 AM, It's Tim said:

One should expect to budget to maintain a 7 year old vehicle.

Sure, I have no problem with maintenance, like the AC and brakes. I do however have a problem with the AFM lifter failures since GM stupidly decreased the reliability of the legendary GM small block pushrod engine to gain 5% in fuel efficiency, while the other manufacturers haven't proposed such a stupid system. The issue is well known and is the subject of a current class action lawsuit.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
On 3/24/2022 at 10:08 AM, It's Tim said:

One should expect to budget to maintain a 7 year old vehicle.

I have a 7 year old, 11 year old and 2 21 year old vehicles. Fluids, some brakes, tires, one needed bars leak. All run really well. I consider that normal. 

  • 1 year later...
Ryeman canada New Member

Ryeman canada

Posted
Posted

I hade the lifter fail, changed all four on one bank. Installed the range device then 500km later the same cylinder failed. I don’t know why, never went into 4cyl mode. Pretty disappointed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • davester
      Turning radius

      By davester · Posted

      Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...