Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking into a travel trailer buts it’s near the upper end of the capacity of the truck.(2019).

 

posting here because I’d like to see how many guys are doing a significant amount of towing with their 5.3 or 6.2 at the upper end of the capacity and if there have been any failures or issues with doing so. 
 

of course I know that you shouldn’t go over the GCWR and should probably stay 25% under. But my question is strictly related to how drivetrains and engines have fared after a good amount of miles towing heavy on the gassers?

 

thank you

Posted (edited)

i tow a 14ft car hauler converted to an RV camper, 3 weeks a year for camping, it probably weighs 4000 lbs when loaded, tow about 150-250 miles a day doing 65mph. tranny temp sits at 150-160

truck is the 5.3 running katec 170 thermostat, with 6l80 no thermostat, 3.42 gears i think, and get 10 mpg dong so

Edited by pokismoki
Posted
30 minutes ago, pokismoki said:

i tow a 14ft car hauler converted to an RV camper, 3 weeks a year for camping, it probably weighs 4000 lbs when loaded, tow about 150-250 miles a day doing 65mph. tranny temp sits at 150-160

truck is the 5.3 running katec 170 thermostat, with 6l80 no thermostat, 3.42 gears i think, and get 10 mpg dong so

 

You have dual speed tcase?

 

If so, 3.42 is correct. If not, 3.09s.

Posted
2 hours ago, pokismoki said:

transfer case is either 1:1 or 40:1 on my old suburban 4x4, its not an overdrive unit, 

Tcase either optioned 4hi or 4hi/4low. The dual, which includes 4low, in part of the max trailer package IIRC which has 3.42s.

 

My 3.09 unit, not max trailering, is only 4hi.

Posted (edited)

Just looked it up, looks like its standard in the Z71, max trailering and optional across the board to get the dual speed tcase.

Single speed RPO: NP0

Dual speed RPO: NQH

Edited by 14burrito
Posted

I don't have the Max Trailer package but do have the trailering package on my 2016 LT. It has the NQH RPO code so the Dual speed transfer case and I have the 3.42 gears.

 

As far as towing, I bought a Wildwood FSX 190RT toy hauler last year. Its a 25' trailer and I am using a Equal-Izer 4 point weight distribution hitch with it. I am also leveled 2" on front and went with Airlift air bags on rear to help control the unreasonable sag that leveled trucks can experience when towing. (I did pick up the onboard compressor kit over the winter and will be installing that soon.) Unloaded weight on that is just over 4400lbs and loaded with my 1200lb trike and some extras, I usually end up just north of 6000lbs. So far, I have felt just fine towing this. The trans and coolant temps were running a tad high and was struggling a bit when climbing some grades. I discovered that if I just dropped the gear shift lever from "D" to "M" just before reaching the grade, the trans would drop a gear and if it was a particularly long or steeper grade, dropping the "M" gear one gear, it did much better. Temps might still rise a bit but not like just staying in "D" and letting the truck decide. Last year was still running with the original installed OEM 190⁰ transmission cooler. This year though, I now have the updated 154⁰ cooler installed and am really looking forward to seeing how the trans temps do while towing. I will still use the "M" choice on grades and expect the trans temps to be much more reasonable.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I seen those airbags break truck frames or bend em.  be careful since , the problem with bags is the weight is not distributed like the leafsprings are on two points on the frame.. you can overload the weakest part of the frames by lifting in the center of the two loading points.

 

you can unload some weight off the rear of the truck by using an  adjustable hitch ball, and raising the trailer up 1-3" above the hitch

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted

Here's the rub. The sag I get is well within normal operation. The trucks are designed with a certain amount of rake. Normally when connecting a trailer, and even one with a wdh, there will still be a certain amount of sag in the rear. Because of the rake, when adjusted properly, you will end up with the rear height pretty much even with the front. 

 

Now when you level, you have essentially eliminated the rake before the trailer even gets hitched up. So then when you get the inevitable sag, you will now have the headlights pointed skyward. Most wdh like my Equal-izer one, you adjust based on the height on the front of the truck. You want to get the front end of the truck back down to the height it was prior to being hitched. Mine does that perfectly. The height is dead on to the height iy was prehitch. But... because of the normal rear sag, the rear ends up being slightly lower than the front and headlights are raised. The amount of sag is acceptable, only about 1-1/2"-2" but because of leveling and eliminating the rake, this causes the issue. 

 

The solution is to use the air bags. I dont use them as a substitute for blocks to raise the rear end, just as an aid. They mount just above the axle and pretty much in same location as replacement blocks would be. I just set them at about 10lbs without the trailer and might bump them up to around 25lbs when adding the trailer. They are rated at 100lbs but I don't ever see a scenario where that much might be needed. I still adjust the airbags so there is still some sag, just not as much as there would be without them on my leveled truck.

Posted
41 minutes ago, 14burrito said:

IMO bags are a bandaid.

 

A properly setup WDH is the way to go and not overloading the TV.

 

A good view here if you have 10minutes.

 

 

I would agree with this if I had an unmodified, unleveled truck. However because I have leveled the front end, there are other variables that come into play.

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, pokismoki said:

I seen those airbags break truck frames or bend em.  be careful since , the problem with bags is the weight is not distributed like the leafsprings are on two points on the frame.. you can overload the weakest part of the frames by lifting in the center of the two loading points.

 

you can unload some weight off the rear of the truck by using an  adjustable hitch ball, and raising the trailer up 1-3" above the hitch

I will pay attention to the frame. However like I mentioned, there is always going to be some unavoidable sag when pulling a trailer weighing over 6000lbs. My wdh is correctly set and the rear end sag is an acceptable amount. It's just that my front end is already 2" above stock, so it no longer has the rake that would normally compensate for the acceptable amount of rear sag.

 

Just to add, I have also taken the rig over to the cat scales to weigh it and it is well within the limits for front axle, rear axle, and trailer axles. I did it 3 ways, full rig with wdh, full rig with the wdh bars unattached, and just the truck. Everything comes up as adjusted properly.

Edited by mikeyk101
Posted
On 3/26/2022 at 10:25 PM, RPaul said:

of course I know that you shouldn’t go over the GCWR and should probably stay 25% under. But my question is strictly related to how drivetrains and engines have fared after a good amount of miles towing heavy on the gassers?

The issue isn't pulling it ... it's trying to stop it. Say for instance the trailer brakes were to fail in an emergency situation do you really want to go there?

Posted
2 hours ago, It's Tim said:

The issue isn't pulling it ... it's trying to stop it. Say for instance the trailer brakes were to fail in an emergency situation do you really want to go there?

That is a good point and proper maintenance of trailer brakes and making sure the brake controller is functioning properly is a must. I personally wouldn't tow something where I was near the capacity of what the truck was safely rated for. It would be time to upgrade the truck for more towing capacity if that's the case. That was the reason for choosing the toyhauler I did so I had a cushion on capacity but still was a size that would be useful. 

Posted (edited)

i would look at helper springs before i get bags, then if it still sags add a 2" block to the rear, then adjust tounge weight with adjustable ball hitch

 

then get a set of aggressive brake pads from EBC to really bite into the rotors

Edited by pokismoki

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,611 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...