Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 hours ago, jaxcam02 said:

10-15 MPH might have been a bit too fast. Water can and will find its way into almost everything, especially if it is forced upwards in hefty quantities. My guess is that some of the hose clamps in the intake may have been loose or the intake manifold had a gasket that didn't seal completely and a decent quantity of water got splashed around the engine bay. I can't see an easy way that water made its way all the way through the stock airbox (although completely possible) and into the motor though if all the gaskets and hose clamps were within spec and the PCV system wasn't compromised.

Never though that anything could be loose or not sealed properly. Engine is replaced and all is ok for now, so I can't retrace them, but something I should check now that I have it home to prevent something from happening again. 

Posted

My point in my earlier post is that you can actually build a wall of water in front of you higher than your rockers if you're moving at certain speeds. It used to happen in my '80 model truck. i drove in water depths up to my doors, even coming in the door a bit one time. I was pushing a mound of water in front of me. It even bent from license plate all to hell one time. But since air intake wasn't in the grill and quarter panel, I never hydrolocked anything.

 

Glad you got it all fixed up now

  • Like 2
Posted

What will you do when your submerged electronics, sensors and wiring connections corrode, turn green and fail? Many vehicles are totalled 4 to 6 months after being submerged. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just had this happen last Wednesday. What kind of tires do you have. What we found is that the mud tread on my tires was throwing water up around the duct that goes into the air cleaner from the splash guard. The water was getting sucked in around that duct because it's not a sealed connection.  I was driving through 6-8 inches of water. 

Posted

I've been running the stock DuraTracs that came with the truck. I've heard before this isn't a sealed connection which is troubling since water could easily make it's way in from an even lower position with a minimal wading depth. Wondering if anyone has any creative solutions to this issue. Although I suppose I could wrap the connecting joints in something like Gorilla Tape or Flex Seal. Thoughts are appreciated. 

Posted

I've not seen liner extensions so far. Any idea on how you might be doing that?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Shawn Spears said:

What we found is that the mud tread on my tires was throwing water up around the duct that goes into the air cleaner from the splash guard. The water was getting sucked in around that duct because it's not a sealed connection.

I don't understand how water is getting past the fender liner/splash guard. Care to elaborate on your findings or photos of what you are describing?

Posted

We examined another truck with the same air intake configuration that went through the same water I did without issue. The differences between the 2 trucks were that mine is a TB with Mud Tires and his is an RST with street tires. The fender liners on the TB are higher relative to the tires allowing the water picked up by the tread to be thrown/pushed up and forward into the lower engine bay around the air duct. From there the air moving through the duct into the air cleaner acted as a syphon,drawing water into the air cleaner around the somewhat loose fitting duct.

Posted
22 hours ago, Shawn Spears said:

We examined another truck with the same air intake configuration that went through the same water I did without issue. The differences between the 2 trucks were that mine is a TB with Mud Tires and his is an RST with street tires. The fender liners on the TB are higher relative to the tires allowing the water picked up by the tread to be thrown/pushed up and forward into the lower engine bay around the air duct. From there the air moving through the duct into the air cleaner acted as a syphon,drawing water into the air cleaner around the somewhat loose fitting duct.

Are you saying the fender liners are different or its because the TB has the factory lift?

 

A shield in front of the opening into the air box might be simple enough to craft. 

Posted

It's because the TB has a factory lift. All configurations of the Silverado use the same liners. Sealing the connection should be enough to mitigate the risk of water intrusion, I just prefer redundancy when it comes to preventing this from happening again. Crafting an extension for the liner should be pretty easy and inexpensive.

Posted (edited)
On 8/11/2022 at 9:44 AM, pokismoki said:

it came up to the rockers and you hydrolocked it, i think you where deeper than you imagine,  the air intake is about headlight level

 

On 8/11/2022 at 3:21 PM, Ryan S. said:

There's easily a foot or more distance between the rocker and the middle of the headlight.

 

On 8/11/2022 at 3:25 PM, Ryan S. said:

Never though that anything could be loose or not sealed properly. Engine is replaced and all is ok for now, so I can't retrace them, but something I should check now that I have it home to prevent something from happening again. 

 

On 8/24/2022 at 12:07 PM, asilverblazer said:

I don't understand how water is getting past the fender liner/splash guard. Care to elaborate on your findings or photos of what you are describing?

 

On 8/24/2022 at 12:33 PM, Shawn Spears said:

We examined another truck with the same air intake configuration that went through the same water I did without issue. The differences between the 2 trucks were that mine is a TB with Mud Tires and his is an RST with street tires. The fender liners on the TB are higher relative to the tires allowing the water picked up by the tread to be thrown/pushed up and forward into the lower engine bay around the air duct. From there the air moving through the duct into the air cleaner acted as a syphon,drawing water into the air cleaner around the somewhat loose fitting duct.

 

 

Pics below.  These T1 trucks don't draw air in from the fender like K2 and older did.  They draw air from the top of the radiator via airflow from the grille and hood area.  There is the main inlet hole on the driver's side of the radiator shield.  That path opening enters a tube that then interfaces with the air inlet of the airbox.  It is NOT a sealed fit, just two pieces of plastic that slip into each other. 

 

I have a pic from behind the wheel well area as well.  You can see the ECM is just under this and is mounted directly behind the wheel well liner.  The bottom lip of that air inlet on the airbox is only a few inches from the top of the frame rail.  

 

It's pretty clear to me how fording too fast can get water to ingest into the airbox IMO.  5mph might have saved the original motor from ingesting water.  Enough deep water flow into the wheel well, its gonna get past that liner all day long.  Its bad enough you can see dried salt spray on the bottom of the airbox and all over the ECM (what a "great" place to mount the ECM by the way...)

 

IMG_3847.thumb.jpg.4ff07e884f4b7c859628bef47f6f2759.jpg

 

IMG_3849.thumb.jpg.d98a70a6faba5c7b828ebceeb0552c78.jpg

 

IMG_3853.thumb.jpg.86c6ca8d35296f9bca2ffd83efd03b7e.jpg

 

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...