Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all.  Not sure if this is the right forum for this, but I'll give it a shot.  I have a 2012 Silverado 5.3L Z71 with 6L80E tranny and KC4, K5L, and KNP RPO codes (transmission cooler, heavy-duty oil cooler, etc.).  I have the 3.08 differential (I know...).  This gives me relatively low specs of 1,600 lb payload, 7,000 lb GVWR and 12,200 GCWR.  In addition, I have a weight-distributing Class III hitch rated for 1,100 tongue weight and 10,500 trailer weight, axles are rated at 3,950 pounds each, and LT tires with 125 load index, so I'm good in all those areas.

 

I'm shopping for travel trailers for my family of four.  Our ideal model (2018 Bullet Crossfire 2200BH, for those interested) comes very close to maxing out my truck's specs.  The trailer is 3,975 lbs empty with 425 lb tongue weight.  Seems that the rule of thumb for RV folks is to assume a working tongue weight of 10-15% of loaded trailer weight, which includes the propane and battery.  Assuming 1,000 lbs of gear in the trailer and using 13%, that's 650 lbs on the tongue.  Adding 600 lbs of people and 300 pounds of gear in the truck puts the payload with loaded trailer at 1,550, which is within 50 lbs of the rated max.  Also puts the truck and trailer combined weight at 11,925 pounds which is a cushion of only 275 lbs from the 12,200 GCWR.

 

I'm wondering what peoples' experiences are towing a travel trailer with a load this close to the rated max.  I know that the 5.3L and 3.08 gears means it'll be sluggish, especially up long grades.  While certainly not ideal, I think the powertrain is probably acceptable.  I'm more wondering about safety and stability- the truck getting pushed around at that weight, especially with the wind-catching shape of the travel trailer.  Buying a bigger truck is not an option - buying a smaller trailer is.  What do you guys think about this?

Posted

A weight distribution hitch with anti-swat bars and changing the ring pinion to 3.42 or even 3.73 would be even better, to take a lot of the work load off of the driveline including the motor. But you will pay at the pump, but still cheaper than a bigger truck. The 3.08 ring and pinion is going to make the motor and transmission work a lot harder.

Posted
53 minutes ago, bubbanbrenda said:

A weight distribution hitch with anti-swat bars and changing the ring pinion to 3.42 or even 3.73 would be even better, to take a lot of the work load off of the driveline including the motor. But you will pay at the pump, but still cheaper than a bigger truck. The 3.08 ring and pinion is going to make the motor and transmission work a lot harder.

I have the same truck, but with 3.42 gears and tow a 9000 lb trailer with no problems. My truck is a crew cab short box with the same axle ratings as yours. I did upgrade to a class IV hitch and added an extra leaf spring to help with squat.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Balok1701 said:

I have the same truck, but with 3.42 gears and tow a 9000 lb trailer with no problems. My truck is a crew cab short box with the same axle ratings as yours. I did upgrade to a class IV hitch and added an extra leaf spring to help with squat.

 

Is this a 9k travel trailer?  What kind of terrain are you hauling over?

 

Surely you're exceeding your GCWR at that weight.  Are you over your payload? 

 

In any event, it's good to know that in the real world, the truck handles fine.  I know the 3.08 will put more strain on the engine and transmission but I go slow.

Posted

Sounds like to me you understand the situation, I would buy a smaller trailer. 

Posted (edited)

IMG_0840.HEIC

16 hours ago, Zeezil said:

Hey all.  Not sure if this is the right forum for this, but I'll give it a shot.  I have a 2012 Silverado 5.3L Z71 with 6L80E tranny and KC4, K5L, and KNP RPO codes (transmission cooler, heavy-duty oil cooler, etc.).  I have the 3.08 differential (I know...).  This gives me relatively low specs of 1,600 lb payload, 7,000 lb GVWR and 12,200 GCWR.  In addition, I have a weight-distributing Class III hitch rated for 1,100 tongue weight and 10,500 trailer weight, axles are rated at 3,950 pounds each, and LT tires with 125 load index, so I'm good in all those areas.

 

I'm shopping for travel trailers for my family of four.  Our ideal model (2018 Bullet Crossfire 2200BH, for those interested) comes very close to maxing out my truck's specs.  The trailer is 3,975 lbs empty with 425 lb tongue weight.  Seems that the rule of thumb for RV folks is to assume a working tongue weight of 10-15% of loaded trailer weight, which includes the propane and battery.  Assuming 1,000 lbs of gear in the trailer and using 13%, that's 650 lbs on the tongue.  Adding 600 lbs of people and 300 pounds of gear in the truck puts the payload with loaded trailer at 1,550, which is within 50 lbs of the rated max.  Also puts the truck and trailer combined weight at 11,925 pounds which is a cushion of only 275 lbs from the 12,200 GCWR.

 

I'm wondering what peoples' experiences are towing a travel trailer with a load this close to the rated max.  I know that the 5.3L and 3.08 gears means it'll be sluggish, especially up long grades.  While certainly not ideal, I think the powertrain is probably acceptable.  I'm more wondering about safety and stability- the truck getting pushed around at that weight, especially with the wind-catching shape of the travel trailer.  Buying a bigger truck is not an option - buying a smaller trailer is.  What do you guys think about this?

 

Honestly, not sure if this is going to help your case but may give you more confidence! I have a 2013 Silverado CCSB Z71 2wd, it too has the wimpy 3.08 in the back! Even worse I have a 6.5in lift and 35 inch Nitto Trail Grapplers! I have hauled a 4,000lb trailer with it before! It can do it, but it'll definitely like to hold gears! Even for stock size wheels, the 3.08 still lacks in my opinion! If you really like the truck and you have the money, you could regear it to something more optimal like a 3.73+ if ur towing! 

Lifted Clifford.png

Edited by Matt2013LT
Wrong link
Posted
23 hours ago, Zeezil said:

Hey all.  Not sure if this is the right forum for this, but I'll give it a shot.  I have a 2012 Silverado 5.3L Z71 with 6L80E tranny and KC4, K5L, and KNP RPO codes (transmission cooler, heavy-duty oil cooler, etc.).  I have the 3.08 differential (I know...).  This gives me relatively low specs of 1,600 lb payload, 7,000 lb GVWR and 12,200 GCWR.  In addition, I have a weight-distributing Class III hitch rated for 1,100 tongue weight and 10,500 trailer weight, axles are rated at 3,950 pounds each, and LT tires with 125 load index, so I'm good in all those areas.

 

I'm shopping for travel trailers for my family of four.  Our ideal model (2018 Bullet Crossfire 2200BH, for those interested) comes very close to maxing out my truck's specs.  The trailer is 3,975 lbs empty with 425 lb tongue weight.  Seems that the rule of thumb for RV folks is to assume a working tongue weight of 10-15% of loaded trailer weight, which includes the propane and battery.  Assuming 1,000 lbs of gear in the trailer and using 13%, that's 650 lbs on the tongue.  Adding 600 lbs of people and 300 pounds of gear in the truck puts the payload with loaded trailer at 1,550, which is within 50 lbs of the rated max.  Also puts the truck and trailer combined weight at 11,925 pounds which is a cushion of only 275 lbs from the 12,200 GCWR.

 

I'm wondering what peoples' experiences are towing a travel trailer with a load this close to the rated max.  I know that the 5.3L and 3.08 gears means it'll be sluggish, especially up long grades.  While certainly not ideal, I think the powertrain is probably acceptable.  I'm more wondering about safety and stability- the truck getting pushed around at that weight, especially with the wind-catching shape of the travel trailer.  Buying a bigger truck is not an option - buying a smaller trailer is.  What do you guys think about this?

I think you'll be fine, anecdotally, I'm pulling a much bigger trailer both size and weight without issue. 

 

Ratings aside, the truck will be fine. If you are worried about the ratings - you're under them - send it. Properly set up the weight distribution and trailer brake controller and travel on. 

 

Of course, you'll find people that say not to exceed 50% of of some rating too. ({})

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Matt2013LT said:

Honestly, not sure if this is going to help your case but may give you more confidence! I have a 2013 Silverado CCSB Z71 2wd, it too has the wimpy 3.08 in the back! Even worse I have a 6.5in lift and 35 inch Nitto Trail Grapplers! I have hauled a 4,000lb trailer with it before! It can do it, but it'll definitely like to hold gears!

 

Well, I didn't mention in my post that I have 33" LT tires (25 lb more per tire than the stock 31.5" P) and a 1.75" level via Bilstein 5100s.  Which is also part of the reason I'm concerned with that trailer for this truck.

Posted

It'll tow it, even modded.  4.10 gears will make up for the taller tire and smaller engine won't have to work so hard anymore.

Posted
On 8/31/2022 at 7:34 PM, Zeezil said:

 

Well, I didn't mention in my post that I have 33" LT tires (25 lb more per tire than the stock 31.5" P) and a 1.75" level via Bilstein 5100s.  Which is also part of the reason I'm concerned with that trailer for this truck.

Zeezil - You had me until the unleveling kit.  I suppose that's what the 1.75" deal is.  I'm just kidding.  I don't think the unleveling kit would effect you too much.  But the tires and resulting gearing will.  

 

I don't have nearly the same truck (with either my GMC or my Dodge), but I just got through pulling probably 6,000 pounds with the GMC.  It seemed to handle it ok.  But, I didn't go a long distance, nor did I get on the interstate.  And my GMC has 3.73's, and a 4.8L.

 

I'm still teetering barely to the side of the fence that I think you'll be ok.  Because you are within specs, and you seem to have a keen grasp on the whole situation.  Including, going slow.  The only excitement you're going to get from that tow is the excitement you don't want.  Ha!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,821 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...