Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am trying to replace lower ball joints on my 2014 Silverado 1500 Z71. The drivers side is very stuck. I have broke everything else loose, I just cannot get the lower ball joint busted loose from the steering knuckle. I have tried the tuning fork and the separator clamp. The clamp does not expand far enough to track the bottom of the ball joint stud. Any ideas? This has been too many days trying to figure this out. 

5A462E77-C321-439F-B21F-6E4975D5CEDB.jpeg

717579F6-4C38-4780-A569-BA13D904B69B.jpeg

F87E5CC6-CA37-47E0-BEFD-CD7BAB273A6C.jpeg

  • Sad 1
Posted

Heat the knuckle with a propane or map gas torch. You likely need to expand the metal that is around the ball joint stud. Do that for a while to get it nice and hot, then use a ball joint fork to try and get it out.

  • Like 1
Posted

Strike the side of the knuckle adjacent to the taper with a large hammer and that will pop it, may take multiple blows

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Another agreement on a BFH. I used a mini sledge when needed and several real strong hits on the side always got it separated for me. Don't hold back and whack it good.

  • Like 1
Posted

Used a 4lb sledge, didn’t bust it loose. Any other ideas? I got a ball joint separator from the parts store but the notch is not wide enough to go around the ball joint. Do they make bigger ones?

Posted
18 minutes ago, Bryant Wray said:

Used a 4lb sledge, didn’t bust it loose. Any other ideas? I got a ball joint separator from the parts store but the notch is not wide enough to go around the ball joint. Do they make bigger ones?

Air hammer. 

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Bryant Wray said:

Used a 4lb sledge, didn’t bust it loose. Any other ideas? I got a ball joint separator from the parts store but the notch is not wide enough to go around the ball joint. Do they make bigger ones?

How wide is the notch? Mine is at least 15/16" wide

  • Like 1
Posted

7/16? That makes no sense, 7/8 maybe? Sounds like you got a tie rod fork, return it and get a BJ fork

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, richard wysong said:

7/16? That makes no sense, 7/8 maybe? Sounds like you got a tie rod fork, return it and get a BJ fork

Correct, 7/8, my mistake

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/8/2023 at 10:57 AM, Bryant Wray said:

I am trying to replace lower ball joints on my 2014 Silverado 1500 Z71. 

 

Stop by my house and borrow my J-43631 and torture yourself no more.

Kent Moore Ball Joint Puller Tool J-43631 (cs1354 802 B3 for sale ...

 

 

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...