Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/15/2024 at 2:41 PM, UWSkier said:

You install the diode between the truck and that wire junction.  Those other wires are coming from your charge controller, your solar, etc.  They all meet there to push charge to your battery.  I put in a diode last year, and with the 2023 controller TSB fix, haven't had a singe brake issue since over 6000+ miles.

Same…diode is the answer. BUT, lets get crafty and put it on the back side of the connector and then its a fix for every trailer rather than just the ones you own. 
I pull fleet trailers from work often and we rotate them out of the fleet as early as every week or two(pending the salesmen are kicking a$$). 
Just need to find the time to put the truck up on the lift and get it done. 
should we the consumers have to do this though, hard no. GM should utilize some AI and gather information from these forums to come up with a fix. 
if it weren’t for people like all of you, there would be very little solutions out there. 
Hats off to the wealth of knowledge on this forum. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Diodes may prevent the problem but you are drastically reducing the charge to your trailer battery because of the 0.7V forward voltage drop that the diode has across it. If that is acceptable...go for it.

Posted
13 minutes ago, bruceb58 said:

Diodes may prevent the problem but you are drastically reducing the charge to your trailer battery because of the 0.7V forward voltage drop that the diode has across it. If that is acceptable...go for it.

That would leave you with essentially like a .65 to 9.5 gain setting in relation to the voltage drop? 
That would work fine with me. 
Im now on gain setting 6 for my camper. Will just need to bump it up a half or so to be relatable to what it was before. 

Posted

To cloud dodger:  You state on August 14th that after your brake module replacement part #23306694, your brake problem is fixed??  We had ours replace with the claimed upgraded part #85073615 and it still is not fixed.  Maybe this upgrade is NOT the correct fix.

Posted

A quick search shows the roadmaster 690 diode lets up to 85 amps flow, so charging the rv batteries shouldnt be a problem from the tow vehicle installing it. 

 

If,,, that is a problem, lots of other one way diodes rated for bigger loads for things like solar installation are also an option. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Chadw90 said:

That would leave you with essentially like a .65 to 9.5 gain setting in relation to the voltage drop? 
That would work fine with me. 
Im now on gain setting 6 for my camper. Will just need to bump it up a half or so to be relatable to what it was before. 

I would hope you are actually putting the diode in the 12V charge wire and not the blue wire that controls your brakes. Putting it on the blue wire accomplishes nothing other than reducing your gain. All that blue wire does is go to your brake magnets. There is no reverse voltage.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, lineman1234 said:

A quick search shows the roadmaster 690 diode lets up to 85 amps flow, so charging the rv batteries shouldnt be a problem from the tow vehicle installing it. 

 

If,,, that is a problem, lots of other one way diodes rated for bigger loads for things like solar installation are also an option. 

Has nothing to do with the amount of current the diode can flow. Because of the battery's internal resistance, the larger voltage delta between the present battery voltage and the charge voltage will determine the current. If your alternator is putting out 14.0V at the 7 pin connector and you lower it by 0.7V to 13.3V, you are giving the battery basically a float voltage...not a voltage sufficient to actually charge a battery. Measure the current going to the battery with a clamp meter...it's easy to confirm.

 

BTW, diodes are rated for max current...it doesn't mean the diode limits the current to that number. If you exceed that number, the diode will blow.

Edited by bruceb58
Posted (edited)

Im not sure what the larger delta is on DC. 

 

I went to school for my electric lineman career, but delta is a connection, in my job. 

Edited by lineman1234
Posted
41 minutes ago, lineman1234 said:

Im not sure what the larger delta is on DC. 

 

I went to school for my electric lineman career, but delta is a connection, in my job. 

I am an electrical engineer..."delta" is the difference between two numbers

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bruceb58 said:

I am an electrical engineer..."delta" is the difference between two numbers

As a former 7th-grade math student, I can confirm this.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thats great. You 2 stick with your term delta. 

 

 My lineman term ill stick with, that is a delta primary or secondary connection, AC. Phase to phase connection/s.

 

Not to be confused with a Y connection/s, phase to ground, also used in primary and secondary AC. 

 

Both have a different voltage/number. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, BuckWallace said:

As a former 7th-grade math student, I can confirm this.

Likewise!

 

Also used the term in my calculus class in high school.

Edited by brad bill
  • Like 1
Posted

Both are correct in their various use. In the case of three phase electrical transformers, the term delta is used to describe the shape of the connections (in a Delta type) which in this case resembles a triangle (the shape of the letter D in Greek). The WYE type transformer connections resemble the shape of a Y. These are often used where single phase power resides, like in residential subdivisions.

 

I’m an old Land Surveyor.

  • Like 1
Posted

Getting back on track.

 

If you lower the voltage to the battery you are charging, you will source less current.

 

Adding a diode is not a great solution if you really want to charge a battery. Way better off installing a DC to DC converter on the trailer side. If the DC to DC converter is  anything greater than 15A. you will likely need a bigger wire than what is in the 7 pin.

  • Haha 1
Posted

( for those of you that love to trollllll, and argue about anything. ) This post isnt about arguing, just sharing what i have first hand information on the/my problem so far. 

 

I dont even have the recall. Yet, or maybe i wont get it. But i do seem to have the check connection message on this 5ver, the only thing i have towed so far.

 

My simple pig, has towed 3 times, but will be heading south from the very north of MN in 1.5ish months. The first tow picking up this new to me 5ver, the camper was in storage in the sellers pole barn, not plugged in. I towed about 65 miles, no problem without the dash giving any warning. 

 

Second tow, after the camper being plugged in. As i am retired and full time rv it till i get sick of travel. The camper was plugged in for months. I took it for a 120 mile trip, the dash lit up with the warning almost right away, and intermittent till tow was done. 

 

3rd tow about 160 mile trip, dash lit up right away, same intermittent. I had cleaned connections and did a little dielectric grease before connecting. As well as tightened up the connections on the plug, that seemed a little sloppy. 

 

I installed the diode on the camper side in the pin box. If it works, ill post back and say so on my 1,600 mile trip south. If not, ill post back and say so. 

 

A friend has a gmc 3500 gasser, also a 2024, tows another brand 5ver 1 battery in camper, i had 2 at the time of tow, now 3. No solar on either camper. He tows often and has not had the dash light up, also keeps the camper plugged in at home. He did get a recall and did get, said recall done. Still no problem. 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No engine digit "E" for 2019-2026.  Stop reading slop online     All 2026 V8s have functioning DFM.  Hardware and software.  5.3 and 6.2.  The L84 5.3 has "D" as the 8th digit of the VIN, the L87 6.2 has "L" as the 8th digit of the VIN.       If you want a factory DFM disabled 2019-2026, you'd have to find a used 2021 or 2022 chip shortage truck.  The vehicle build data will have a specific RPO code indicating its a factory disabled truck.  RPO code YK9 and only with the L84 5.3 engine.  These still have the hardware installed but are NOT functioning due to the COVID chip shortages that were ongoing.  
    • My post above is the direct reason for my outsized interest in keeping what I have for as long as possible. My memory isn't as short as some. 
    • I don't think so. 😏 Cars? Our experience will diverge there as well. I was buying cars with 200K (1970's) when I started and quite a few were pretty solid cars. (My early stuff was 1964 to 1968)  Some stinkers but not the dismal picture painted above. Now that said, yes, a dealer wouldn't talk to you if your car had more than 60K on the clock and lot cars were 60K or less except the back row where 100-120K was the auction bought for dirt for us poor losers. Kids in my county were not allowed to wear long pants if they couldn't rebuild and repair every part of that beast.    I will agree that many parts are now better. Alternators and charging systems are an envy. But I replaced few water pumps or power steering pumps then. Rebuilt carburetors but replaced few. Mufflers are another place of OEM improvement. Stainless? We didn't have no stink'n stainless.    As long as humans are in charge of governance this $$$$ situation will not improve.    The purchasing power of a dollar in 1955 is significantly higher than in 2025, meaning that a dollar could buy more goods and services in 1955 compared to 2025 due to inflation over the years. For example, what you could buy for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025.  Calculator.net inflationtool.com   Comparison of Purchasing Power: 1955 vs 2025 The purchasing power of a dollar has changed significantly from 1955 to 2025 due to inflation. Below is a breakdown of how much more money is needed in 2025 to match the buying power of a dollar in 1955. Purchasing Power Overview Year Equivalent Value of $1 in 1955 1955 $1.00 2025 $10.50 Key Points Inflation Impact: The value of money decreases over time due to inflation, meaning that the same amount of money buys fewer goods and services in the future. Example of Inflation: What could be purchased for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025. This illustrates how inflation has eroded the purchasing power of the dollar over the decades. Understanding these changes in purchasing power is crucial for financial planning and assessing economic conditions over time.  Wikipedia Calculator.net
    • The thermometer has been in my wife's 2008 envoy, my sons 2016 chevy, my friends 2020 1500 silverado all showing cooler readings. It's not the guage.
    • Have a question concerning trim levels. Ive not bought a new vehicle since 2006, and I have decided on a 2500 gmc pro or silverado custom. For anyone that has one of these 2 trim levels have you regretted not stepping up to the LT or SLE. I look at things as the more electronics the more problems to arise. I love the look of the old school gauges on the dash as well. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...