Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking for advice on UCA replacements for my 2019 Sierra SLE with X31. It is all stock as built including tires and @ 21,000 miles it started wandering slightly and when I had the oil changed the dealer said the camber is off on both front wheels. Before spending the money on an alignment, I would like to replace the Upper Control Arms with something better and hopefully greaseable. I do not want to go back to stock, what is recommended. I will be keeping it all stock, no lift kits or oversize tires or wheels.

Thanks

Posted

It should align fine with the stock parts in that case.  Why not just have it aligned correctly?  The parts are installed at the factory in positions that in theory should be aligned but may not actually be 100% correct.

 

I'd personally have a good alignment shop do it.

Posted (edited)

Unless something is bent or the ball joints are worn, it sounds like a simple alignment issue here.

 

The caster/camber adjustment on these T1s is down on the lower control arms now, not the upper like the previous generation trucks were. 

 

IMO, again if nothing is bent, worn or loose, there is nothing to change especially since you are all stock up front (no lifts or levels), so just have it properly aligned.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

I do plan to have an alignment shop look at it and align it. I have read so many horror stories about the UCA'S and ball joints going out so I was just looking for a recommendation on an upgraded replacement if mine are worn. If they need to be replaced, I will not replace them with factory parts, they should not need to be replaced in 20,000 miles. As far as I am concerned the X31 package is a joke. If we treated these trucks like you see in some of the latest TV commercials from Chevy, the front suspension would collapse. So now can someone recommend a good replacement that will last?

Posted

I'd still wager there's nothing wrong with yours.  The alignment is just off.

 

Moogs are usually better but no idea if they're greaseable or not.

Posted

Moog problem solver series are greaseable. I replaced both my upper and lower when my Tire shop showed me some slop in the lower ones. GM uses the cheapest suspension parts they can find on these trucks. Check on Rockauto

 

Yotaman

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Tom Hoshock said:

I do plan to have an alignment shop look at it and align it. I have read so many horror stories about the UCA'S and ball joints going out so I was just looking for a recommendation on an upgraded replacement if mine are worn. 

 

 

Those horror stories 99.9% of them are on leveled and lifted trucks both regular 4x4/Z71/X31 and on Trail Boss/AT4.  The arms end up placed at their limit on the road and then over the limit when the suspension is traveling.  

 

The only arms we've replaced so far in the field are on leveled trucks on these newer T1's.  One was a full failure of the ball joint and CV axle.  No stock T1 trucks that I've seen have received upper arms yet.

 

Just seems like making a mountain out of a molehill here for a 100% stock truck that's just out of alignment a bit.  

Edited by newdude
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

As far as "upgrades", a quick trip on Rock Auto shows Rancho having a UCA but they are for leveled/lifted trucks or stock AT4/Trail Boss and are not greaseable so they would just have a corrected angle for the ball joint mobility/UCA travel.

 

Mevotech makes upper arms but I wouldn't call Mevotech an "upgrade" other than the fact it has a grease fitting in the ball joint which, big deal.  

 

Moog does not offer a UCA yet.  

Edited by newdude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't know how far back vehicles had hour meters, be it driver accessible or diag accessible but was wondering if there was any rule of thumb your shop came up with in regards to an hour limit on engine oil regardless of the miles on the oil.    I know with construction or farm equipment its almost always based on engine hours for maintenance scheduling as no other metric really applies other than a seasonal time limit that one self imposes on items like engine oil.  
    • I'm not sure what to say on that mess but I will say that is an odd thing for that mechanic to speculate on as per assuming its been run out of oil a few times as the odds of that engine having instead piled up with a complete seizure would be very high if such events had actually taken place. However there is nothing saying that the oil has ever been changed although once again, what filter was on that engine as that would tell part of the story if its possible to figure out if its a factory installed filter or not. Too many items unknown and a lot of speculation, but regardless of that its one fubared mess that is mind boggling to see for a vehicle that new and its hard to imagine how it ever made it that far in life looking at the top of the engine.    His scanners, I've watched him before here and there and I'd have to say if I recall correctly that some of his scanning equipment is one or two steps up from a child's Exo Sketch 😋
    • I agree. That`s a LOT of sludge for 12,000 miles. I tossed that out here since this is an OCI thread. There`s tons of people here that do not post.   I used to work on a city fleet. That includes police cars and fire trucks. Lesson is, not to only use the odo for oci. A police car has a ton of hours on the engine for the miles it shows. And, not just idling, directing traffic. They beat on these things.   Course, since it is a Kia, they were gonna use the "100,000 mile warranty" for their OCI.😉
    • CLASS ACTION SUITS?  Does anyone know if there is already a class action suit for the paint - which was to have been fixed, changed in after the 2020 GM vehicles?  Does it look like this?    Just started 3 weeks ago - No help from GM as of yet - Dealer will not assist in speaking with GM on my behalf. Confirmed it is the paint they use along with the way the put it on that causes it to fail.  Clearly a Manufacturer's Defect. 
    • That dog don't hunt. 😏   First, a 2025 with 12K on the clock AND idled for a year nonstop is false on it's face; this is 2026. You can do one or the other but not both.    Second, ENGINE HOURS are absolutely available. The rest is third grade math. Micky Mouse scanner he got out of a box of Cracker Jacks OR an ID10T error.    Third, if they ran it out of oil "Several times" that motor is boned on the first hit.    Does this guy think piling higher makes it stink less? 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...