Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, i purchased this truck new in July 2017.  Been a fantastic truck other than the crappy fuel economy that is typical of the 6.0 motor and the 6 speed transmission.  It had a few hiccups that were covered under warranty including a "service 4wd" code that after 5 trips to the dealer they fixed (and still dont know what they did to fix it).  But, here is my "dilemma".  The truck has 135K miles.  While i have religiously always done oil changes, ect., i have never done a transmission service.  Ive had more than one person tell me that these trucks with this transmission that if it hasnt been serviced by now, NOT to service it as it could possibly start faulty shifting.  Even the dealer where i bought it said that if i bring it to them to service, they will do it but cannot warrant that it wont start acting up.

 

Is this true?  Fluid is still full and still nice and pink with no burn smell.  So should i just "leave it be" from now on and just add transmission fluid if it ever needs it or what?

Posted

interesting.  i might jinx myself, but this truck doesnt leak a drop of anything and never has. (knock on wood)

Posted

Heat kills the fluid & that usually kills the torque converters. Your transmission should have been serviced at about 50k, IMO. If it were me, which you aren't, I'd suck out the fluid in the pan, about 4 qts, & replace with Dexron VI. Run it for 100  to 200 miles & do it again. I'd also do the transmission thermostat 'pill flip to lower the transmission running temperature.

I bet you haven't changed transfer case fluid or front & rear differentials. 

Too many videos on YouTube on what NOT changing fluid happens. 

Do your own research on this & then ask that question 

Posted

I realize I have an older truck things may have changed for the worse with newer ones. And yes I’ve owed plenty of 3/4 and 1 tons. I remember some of my GMs didn’t even call for a transmission fluid change until 150K miles. I wouldn’t hesitate to do a fluid exchange, not a flush. At 165K I gave my avalanche a fluid exchange through the dipstick. I measured the fluid and put the same back in. One week later did it again. Almost 4 years ago. 

Posted

If anything the most I'd do is suck out 2-3 quarts from the dipstick tube and dump the same amount back in. Call it good from there for a long time.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, rav3 said:

Heat kills the fluid & that usually kills the torque converters. Your transmission should have been serviced at about 50k, IMO. If it were me, which you aren't, I'd suck out the fluid in the pan, about 4 qts, & replace with Dexron VI. Run it for 100  to 200 miles & do it again. I'd also do the transmission thermostat 'pill flip to lower the transmission running temperature.

I bet you haven't changed transfer case fluid or front & rear differentials. 

Too many videos on YouTube on what NOT changing fluid happens. 

Do your own research on this & then ask that question 

I get that.  I went thru automotive school in the late 70's (got tired of working on other peoples junk), then became a construction electrician.  I built race cars back in the day, and from age 40-55 road raced motorcycles all over the SE U.S. building and maintaining those as well.  I'm very aware of what kills transmissions.  The rear end was just serviced about a year ago and the 4wd was serviced at 80K.  I just screwed up and never did the transmission on this truck (traded in a 2003 D'max i owned since new at 350K for this truck, and because the Allison transmission was so easy and convenient to service, it got a new filter and fluid every 3rd oil change or approx 30K miles).  

 

Having said all that, yes, I'm a dumbass for not servicing the tranny on this truck.  At 62 years old i don't feel like climbing under the damn thing anymore (haven't for many years), so I was going to let my dealer do it when they told me about this issue.  Since then have spoken to a couple of others that have said the same thing.  Hence why I am asking the question here.  

Edited by T_ClarkEx39
Posted
2 hours ago, T_ClarkEx39 said:

I get that.  I went thru automotive school in the late 70's (got tired of working on other peoples junk), then became a construction electrician.  I built race cars back in the day, and from age 40-55 road raced motorcycles all over the SE U.S. building and maintaining those as well.  I'm very aware of what kills transmissions.  The rear end was just serviced about a year ago and the 4wd was serviced at 80K.  I just screwed up and never did the transmission on this truck (traded in a 2003 D'max i owned since new at 350K for this truck, and because the Allison transmission was so easy and convenient to service, it got a new filter and fluid every 3rd oil change or approx 30K miles).  

 

Having said all that, yes, I'm a dumbass for not servicing the tranny on this truck.  At 62 years old i don't feel like climbing under the damn thing anymore (haven't for many years), so I was going to let my dealer do it when they told me about this issue.  Since then have spoken to a couple of others that have said the same thing.  Hence why I am asking the question here.  

I get it too! I'm 76 & don't like like crawling under cars anymore either. Like I mentioned, suck it out the fill tube & don't bother with the filter. It only stops the big chunks & won't stop/filter the clutch material, which IMO does the most wear. I made a simple vacuum pump from a Harbor Freight $16 A/C venturi pump that runs off my compressor, a little clear PVC tubing from Lowe's & 4 quart jars. Takes about 15 mins to suck the pan out then pour in 4 fresh quarts. I do that about every 10k miles plus I did the pill flip so tyranny never goes over 155F foe most part. We'll see how long it lasts.

Posted
35 minutes ago, T_ClarkEx39 said:

What is this pill flip?   Never heard of it 

Here's one video on it. There's several on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/GaG6I-5Ko_A

Posted
3 hours ago, CamGTP said:

If anything the most I'd do is suck out 2-3 quarts from the dipstick tube and dump the same amount back in. Call it good from there for a long time.

Strange, I always get 4+ quarts when I do it. IIRC, the 6L80 holds about 9 quarts, so if you do it 2x close together after driving it a little, you've replaced about 75% of the fluid with new fresh fluid. Add a bottle of Lubegard & transmission shifts good.

Posted
13 minutes ago, rav3 said:

Here's one video on it. There's several on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/GaG6I-5Ko_A

Thanks for that!   I'll check it out. My everyday non towing temps in this Ga heat right now are 155F-165F. 

Towing my boat this past weekend i was around 180F. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...