Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Last weekend I changed the front and rear struts/shocks as well as the sway bar links and figured I’d take it in for an all-wheel alignment. I’m not as familiar with interpreting the alignment report and figured I’d come here to see what others think, good, bad, indifferent. image2023-10-20-100306.pdf

  • Sad 2
Posted

I would not be happy with that alignment.  Too much caster in my opinion.  The factory spec does not call for that much, with those tires anyway.  What tires are you running?  A good tech will optimize the alignment based on the installed tires and how the customer drives.

 

Don't like your camber, might have a ball joint needing replacement on the passenger side.  It's going to wear the tires.

 

image.thumb.png.17439ec3baf797be4d9c0bd94557a67b.png

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Wow, that is a terrible printout.  Definitely not a Hunter machine which prints out nice bar graphs before and after.

 

I'd agree with swathidver, needs to go back for re-alignment or to a shop that can do it better.  However, before doing so, unless they somehow put that much camber in your right front, I'd be checking the front end out for loose ball joints.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, newdude said:

Wow, that is a terrible printout.  Definitely not a Hunter machine which prints out nice bar graphs before and after.

 

I'd agree with swathidver, needs to go back for re-alignment or to a shop that can do it better.  However, before doing so, unless they somehow put that much camber in your right front, I'd be checking the front end out for loose ball joints.  

 

I'd be asking :wtf:!! They literally didn't do a thing but take your money. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, swathdiver said:

I would not be happy with that alignment.  Too much caster in my opinion.  The factory spec does not call for that much, with those tires anyway.  What tires are you running?  A good tech will optimize the alignment based on the installed tires and how the customer drives.

 

Don't like your camber, might have a ball joint needing replacement on the passenger side.  It's going to wear the tires.

 

image.thumb.png.17439ec3baf797be4d9c0bd94557a67b.png


im not all that familiar with checking ball joints. How are you able to determine the passenger side camber concern, is it the -.10 and -.66 final numbers? I bought the truck used in May, it only has 77k miles on it one owner. The tires are the stock 17”, and I’ve not noticed any wear on them. I also don’t feel any shake/vibration when driving. 
 

The alignment was done at NTB, not sure if that helps. I also noticed that the paperwork says Crew Cab, I have an extended cab and standard bed.

Edited by bamafan76
  • Like 1
Posted

There isn't a value for the right camber initial angle thus no determination about it can be made at all about the ball joints health. The rest are insignificant changes.

 

What you received is an "in spec" alignment but not an ON-SPEC alignment. These are from my truck. I chose to have dialed in a bit less caster but the camber and toe and about perfect CENTER SPEC. 

 

Looks like they adjusted the toe and that alone. Any changes to the other measurements are the result of that change they are so small. Can't pick up one end of stick sort of thing. They did the bare minimum and that poorly. But sir, you don't know what you don't know. Now you do. 

 

 

 

post-161433-0-91552300-1490407962_thumb.jpgpost-161433-0-65318600-1490405985_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, bamafan76 said:


im not all that familiar with checking ball joints. How are you able to determine the passenger side camber concern, is it the -.10 and -.66 final numbers? I bought the truck used in May, it only has 77k miles on it one owner. The tires are the stock 17”, and I’ve not noticed any wear on them. I also don’t feel any shake/vibration when driving. 
 

The alignment was done at NTB, not sure if that helps. I also noticed that the paperwork says Crew Cab, I have an extended cab and standard bed.

Yes, the number is high in my opinion and may be a sign of a bad ball joint.  If you put a dial indicator on it and measure for movement, any more than 1/2 a millimeter is out of spec.

  

One can jounce the bumpers and get the numbers to change some and then print off a report and pull on the next car without doing anything.  I learned from Grumpy to insist that they set it to specific numbers and not just in the green.  

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

There isn't a value for the right camber initial angle thus no determination about it can be made at all about the ball joints health. The rest are insignificant changes.

 

What you received is an "in spec" alignment but not an ON-SPEC alignment. These are from my truck. I chose to have dialed in a bit less caster but the camber and toe and about perfect CENTER SPEC. 

 

Looks like they adjusted the toe and that alone. Any changes to the other measurements are the result of that change they are so small. Can't pick up one end of stick sort of thing. They did the bare minimum and that poorly. But sir, you don't know what you don't know. Now you do. 

 

 

 

post-161433-0-91552300-1490407962_thumb.jpgpost-161433-0-65318600-1490405985_thumb.jpg

Thanks for the information. Would a shop offer a refund if not satisfied with an alignment? If they didn’t do much to begin with, I’d be reluctant to let them try again. It’s my first time using NTB, Firestone was my other option, or Goodyear.

Posted
8 hours ago, bamafan76 said:

Thanks for the information. Would a shop offer a refund if not satisfied with an alignment? If they didn’t do much to begin with, I’d be reluctant to let them try again. It’s my first time using NTB, Firestone was my other option, or Goodyear.

 

You have to have the conversation beforehand and set an expectation. What they gave you is 'in spec' . It's awful but in spec. I doubt a refund would be given. Finding the right guy is more important than the right shop or even the right equipment and brother. it's hard to find a great alignment guy. Sorry I don't have better news. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

You have to have the conversation beforehand and set an expectation. What they gave you is 'in spec' . It's awful but in spec. I doubt a refund would be given. Finding the right guy is more important than the right shop or even the right equipment and brother. it's hard to find a great alignment guy. Sorry I don't have better news. 

I appreciate the news as disappointing it is. It’s a hard pill to swallow but I’ll just choose not to bring my business there again. The silver lining is learning a ball joint replacement may be in my future (any brand suggestions would be appreciated!), and then I’ll try and find somewhere else to get an alignment. Are there specific measurements I can ask for? I can provide more details on my truck if needed to obtain that information.
 

Another question, is an all wheel alignment necessary or just a front end? I do have a 2wd if that helps. 
 

Thanks again everyone!

Edited by bamafan76
Posted
19 hours ago, bamafan76 said:

I appreciate the news as disappointing it is. It’s a hard pill to swallow but I’ll just choose not to bring my business there again. The silver lining is learning a ball joint replacement may be in my future (any brand suggestions would be appreciated!), and then I’ll try and find somewhere else to get an alignment. Are there specific measurements I can ask for? I can provide more details on my truck if needed to obtain that information.
 

Another question, is an all wheel alignment necessary or just a front end? I do have a 2wd if that helps. 
 

Thanks again everyone!

A good alignment tech, at your local dealership or custom truck shop, will ask you how you drive your car, do you like to hit the on-ramps at 40 mph, etc. and take into consideration the kind of tires on your truck.  Telling them you drive off-road a lot helps too.  Before they even start, they will check your tie rods and ball joints to see if they are within spec and if not, will not do the alignment until those are corrected.

 

Use GM OE only for longest life and durability.  The uppers are not rebuildable.  Even though the lowers are, might as well get new complete lower arms with new bushings as well.  There's a reason why they cost more than twice as much as the Moog CK Series or ACDelco Gold/Professional.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

A good alignment tech, at your local dealership or custom truck shop, will ask you how you drive your car, do you like to hit the on-ramps at 40 mph, etc. and take into consideration the kind of tires on your truck.  Telling them you drive off-road a lot helps too.  Before they even start, they will check your tie rods and ball joints to see if they are within spec and if not, will not do the alignment until those are corrected.

 

Use GM OE only for longest life and durability.  The uppers are not rebuildable.  Even though the lowers are, might as well get new complete lower arms with new bushings as well.  There's a reason why they cost more than twice as much as the Moog CK Series or ACDelco Gold/Professional.

Can I just replace the lower ball joint instead of replacing the control arm? 

Posted
38 minutes ago, bamafan76 said:

Can I just replace the lower ball joint instead of replacing the control arm? 

Yes, but you still have old bushings that secure the arm to the frame and either need to pay someone or rent the tools to pull the old ball joint and press in the new one.  Too much aggravation for me, I went with the whole arm.

 

One kid we know just changed the ball joint and a week later it popped out.  Seems it might have been done a few too many times before!

Posted
4 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

Yes, but you still have old bushings that secure the arm to the frame and either need to pay someone or rent the tools to pull the old ball joint and press in the new one.  Too much aggravation for me, I went with the whole arm.

 

One kid we know just changed the ball joint and a week later it popped out.  Seems it might have been done a few too many times before!

Makes sense. With it only having 77k miles, the carfax not showing and suspension work done when I bought it, I’d guess the ball joints have never been replaced. But, I do have the cast iron arms, can I go with the aluminum without changing the upper arms to aluminum? I looked on gm parts website and didn’t see the cast iron arm listed. 

Posted
3 hours ago, bamafan76 said:

Makes sense. With it only having 77k miles, the carfax not showing and suspension work done when I bought it, I’d guess the ball joints have never been replaced.

 

176K on mine with original ball joints in cast arms. Verify they are worn first. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...