Jump to content

Zr2 front suspension

Joe97281

By Joe97281
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, revrnd said:

Anyone have a U bolt nut kicking around that they can thread a known metric bolt into?

 

I can crawl under my truck tomorrow and check.

I am so limited in the metric bolts and nuts I keep on hand but a while back when I was looking at the ubolts and measured the unthreaded rod and came up with an approximate 5/8 or 16mm diameter and also noted that the outer diameter of the theads is larger due to how they formed the threads, I took a 3/4 course nut and it spun on easily although it was loose side to side. That told me the approximate thread pitch as I never did pull out my metric thread pitch gauge to get an exact figure. Unless I am off and I believe I mentioned this in another comment that its highly likely the thread is a 18mm with a 2.5mm pitch. However its not an 18mm diameter rod so bolt charts won't take that into account, nor would it be easy to find out what actual material GM is using for the ubolts. The only thing I can say with certainty is that a deep 1 1/16 socket fits perfect and that should equate to a 27 mm socket .. so if one does not own much for metric tools the standard socket works perfect !.  

  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

UTGOZER
UTGOZER

Boom! Done!! It turned out just as I hoped. Again, thank you to all that have contributed to this thread.

215robert
215robert

Complete minus alignment!

Epsilon Plus
Epsilon Plus

Front & rear ZR2 lift complete!    37x12.5s on GM 18x8s. No rub!

Posted Images

Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, kylant said:

the u-bolts are M18x2.5

The thread I would agree with but not the actual rod diameter from what I at least measured the other day. I'd have to remeasure using a micrometer to say with 100% certainty. Its quite noticeable when looking at where the threads end and the solid rod continues, how the threads are larger in diameter than the rod itself.  

Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted
On 3/17/2025 at 11:02 AM, GMCnewbie said:

Here's the other images of the Cognito sticker.  Nothing really helpful to identify the spring rate.

20250317_122925.jpg

 

 

 

I'm still hunting around with this. I plugged the 1.02mm difference into AI against my stock 4800lb rate and told it length was approx. 59"

 

It calculated a rate of 4345lb with the 1.02mm drop which is awfully close the the 4400lb lowest available GM stock bar.

 

Also, if you plug "33293 torsion bar" into Google you'll find 19332932 which is a discontinued torsion bar from a 2000 2500.

 

I'd still like to know what the bar rate thing is on the parts.gmparts site. If you look up the 4400 bars (driver is 84745473) in the fitment notes it says BAR RATE= 190

 

My 4800 bar (driver 84745477) says 212.

 

That is a -10.37% difference. AI had that 4345 bar at a 9.5% difference from 4800. 4800 to 4400 is a -8.33% difference. 

 

 

There are some 2wd work trucks that end up around me sometimes. I need to get under one and do some digging next opportunity and see if they are the ones that get the 4400 bars (likely).

  • Like 1
Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Epsilon Plus said:

 

I'm still hunting around with this. I plugged the 1.02mm difference into AI against my stock 4800lb rate and told it length was approx. 59"

 

It calculated a rate of 4345lb with the 1.02mm drop which is awfully close the the 4400lb lowest available GM stock bar.

 

Also, if you plug "33293 torsion bar" into Google you'll find 19332932 which is a discontinued torsion bar from a 2000 2500.

 

I'd still like to know what the bar rate thing is on the parts.gmparts site. If you look up the 4400 bars (driver is 84745473) in the fitment notes it says BAR RATE= 190

 

My 4800 bar (driver 84745477) says 212.

 

That is a -10.37% difference. AI had that 4345 bar at a 9.5% difference from 4800. 4800 to 4400 is a -8.33% difference. 

 

 

There are some 2wd work trucks that end up around me sometimes. I need to get under one and do some digging next opportunity and see if they are the ones that get the 4400 bars (likely).

You got me with this bar rate number, I imagine it relates to something such as how much the bar ramps up in pounds per some measurement distance, certainly a number I've not noticed before. 

 

Those two wheel drive trucks, yes if they are within the years that have the same bar fitment as these 2020 plus chassis have ( or are there a few years prior that these current bars also fit into dimension wise ) , then having the ability to look at the bars to measure accurately as well as take a part number off of and if your able to see the door post sticker to confirm what front axle rating they have. Piece all the info together and compare the diameter to the mystery Cognito bars. What are the odds that they have been laughing all the way to the bank and pretending stupidity at the company, we may figure this out yet. 

 

I have not seen a two wheel drive truck for a number of years now, on dealers lots or used for sale. What was so common up here for so many years has now become the unicorn in the newer model years that is. Still some older trucks on the road that are two wheel drive but less all the time as they rust up if used in our winters. 

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted
On 5/8/2025 at 8:27 AM, GMCnewbie said:

I went with the new Fox 2.5 HTO shocks along with the Cognito torsion bars on my gasser.  The ride is so much better now when hitting speed bumps or anything else in the roads.  I've never used the Bilstein 5100's.  I've heard their fairly stiff which is why I didn't go with them this time around.  I had the 4600's on a pair of Rams from the factory and hated them on both trucks.  I wasn't a fan of the Fox 2.0 shocks, but they greatly improved ride quality over the 4600's on my old Power Wagon.

 

Which way did you mount your rears? Everything I'm reading says Fox prefers body on top, shaft down. I just got my HTOs in and I'm ready to put them on. I bought the 1.5-2.5" lift variety due to the ZR2 mods.

GMCnewbie Enthusiast

GMCnewbie

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Epsilon Plus said:

Which way did you mount your rears?

Great question.  I didn't even think to check the position as I installed the new shocks the same way GM installed the stock ones.  So I have mine body-down.  I thought it was odd, but i figured GM engineers were smarter than myself. lol

  • Thanks 1
GMCnewbie Enthusiast

GMCnewbie

Posted
Posted

Sorry for going dark for the last few months.  Ive been traveling a lot for work and haven't had a lot of free time.  I finished my suspension work and wheel install roughly two months ago and have maybe 100 miles on the truck since.  

kylant Enthusiast

kylant

Posted
Posted (edited)

Fox shocks mount shaft down. 

I "upgraded" my HTOs to Accutune tuned Fox 2.0 reservoirs. The HTOs are for sale for anyone looking. 
I'll make a good deal on them

Edited by kylant
Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, GMCnewbie said:

Great question.  I didn't even think to check the position as I installed the new shocks the same way GM installed the stock ones.  So I have mine body-down.  I thought it was odd, but i figured GM engineers were smarter than myself. lol

 

I'm going to try the Fox way. I'll report in if something weird happens. 

 

Apparently, their reasoning is the steel shaft being more exposed at the bottom has less chance of a damaging impact that could cause a seal leak compared to the aluminum body. This is probably more for off-road trucks than hiway trucks, but that's their game.

GMCnewbie Enthusiast

GMCnewbie

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Epsilon Plus said:

their reasoning is the steel shaft being more exposed at the bottom has less chance of a damaging impact that could cause a seal leak compared to the aluminum body.

That makes sense.  I didn't think about it as I was dealing with heat exhaustion while working on my truck and just put them in same the way the crappy stock Ranchos were.  I'll change mine around one of these days.

Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted

I've always wondered what the long term effects would be on shocks with no protection on the rod, on a front axle there isn't the same amount of direct crap flying straight at the shocks as there is on a rear axle. Its one thing on paved roads that never have winter sand/salt spread on them but can't somehow see a bare rod doing very well on gravel roads and winter roads spread with crap. Has anyone reading this ran a bootless shock for some years to have experience in such conditions ?

Epsilon Plus Enthusiast

Epsilon Plus

Posted
Posted
On 6/30/2025 at 9:14 AM, Epsilon Plus said:

 There are some 2wd work trucks that end up around me sometimes. I need to get under one and do some digging next opportunity and see if they are the ones that get the 4400 bars (likely).

 

 

So far I've tracked down (3) gas 2wd work trucks and (2) of them were crew cabs with the same bars as me. The first one I found that actually had the 4400# bars I didn't have my damn caliper!

 

Somebody is going to find me in a parking lot under their truck measuring and thinking I'm chopping off their catalytic converter!

  • Haha 3
Chuck FB Enthusiast

Chuck FB

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Epsilon Plus said:

 

 

So far I've tracked down (3) gas 2wd work trucks and (2) of them were crew cabs with the same bars as me. The first one I found that actually had the 4400# bars I didn't have my damn caliper!

 

Somebody is going to find me in a parking lot under their truck measuring and thinking I'm chopping off their catalytic converter!

You need an official looking uniform and printed on your shirt "Inspection Osifer" 🤣

 

If GM would have specs on the diameter of each rated torsion bar size, that would make it too easy of course. I am guessing that you found out from GM what the sticker part number is for that #4400 torsion bar and you saw it on that one unicorn truck and no measuring instrument was available. 

Edited by Chuck FB
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • asilverblazer
      VSE CCV Bypass - Anyone have this installed in their L5P?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • asilverblazer
      Transmission Woes :-(

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...