Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As everyone knows the sound is terrible.... I replaced my speakers with the Rockford Fosgate Punch series in my refreshed 2023 Sierra. They sound great. But once my installer removed the alleged factory Bose speakers he discovered they weren't Bose speakers at all..... I'm guessing that GM just put speakers in that fit due to shortages and we paid extra for garbage and replacing the speakers. I smell a class action lawsuit. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

80% of what's sold on Amazon is Chinese junk, too.  Where is their class action lawsuit?  All GM has to do is show Bose was the supplier and the lawsuit is over. 

Posted (edited)

Sounds like Bose may be off-shoring their production. Did not know that, but if true it would explain why their brand is not what it used to be. You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

Edited by TrueBlue
Posted

I just got my 2024 Denali with Bose system.  I like to listen to music at full volume and was prepared to be disappointed.  The Bose system isn't great but not awful.  I feel like the highs are crisp and accurate, the base is a bit weak and mids are solid by the vocal tone is off.  I listen to a lot of classic rock with strong vocals and guitar.  My last vehicle was Jeep Grand Cherokee with 18 speaker 850 watt Harmon Kardon system.  It was very good.  Crisp, accurate, clear, all the way up to full volume.  Again, the Bose is not the best but I'm not sure I'm ready to rip anything apart and spend money to upgrade.  It also seems like the Bose speakers and amp are not easily upgraded due to the lower ohm speakers

Posted
On 12/15/2023 at 11:35 PM, Ted Stryker said:

As everyone knows the sound is terrible.... I replaced my speakers with the Rockford Fosgate Punch series in my refreshed 2023 Sierra. They sound great. But once my installer removed the alleged factory Bose speakers he discovered they weren't Bose speakers at all..... I'm guessing that GM just put speakers in that fit due to shortages and we paid extra for garbage and replacing the speakers. I smell a class action lawsuit. 

Thanks for the update - which speakers did you replace?  Front and rear door speakers?  Any other updates?  Did you order through Crutchfield?  Anything else to share on the install?

Posted
26 minutes ago, shudog said:

I just got my 2024 Denali with Bose system.  I like to listen to music at full volume and was prepared to be disappointed.  The Bose system isn't great but not awful.  I feel like the highs are crisp and accurate, the base is a bit weak and mids are solid by the vocal tone is off.  I listen to a lot of classic rock with strong vocals and guitar.  My last vehicle was Jeep Grand Cherokee with 18 speaker 850 watt Harmon Kardon system.  It was very good.  Crisp, accurate, clear, all the way up to full volume.  Again, the Bose is not the best but I'm not sure I'm ready to rip anything apart and spend money to upgrade.  It also seems like the Bose speakers and amp are not easily upgraded due to the lower ohm speakers

 

 

I agree......not top notch audiophile quality audio but it doesn't sound terrible either IMHO, if adjusted properly for your tastes. 

Definitely not junk, like some here make it out to be. 

 

I probably plan on swapping out the dash and door speakers maybe this spring when it warms up as it won't cost too terrible much to do. 

  • Like 1
Posted

My '24 Denali HD, the Audio Quality of the Bose Speakers are a BIG Letdown.  My other non-industrial life for 45 years, is a pro performing and recording keyboardist. Around the best audio equipment from age 12.

I had my '24 front door panels off soon after delivery, to add KC Highlight LED puck lights to the door under-shells, to see the running-boards at night, to get in & out. (Piss Poor GM Cabin Lighting....... I did many posts on this with @64BAwagon, this summer). At least Cadillac SUV's are lit up like the Vegas Strip. Even Led's inside door and console pockets !

Looking at the "Bose" front door speaker construction quality (Lack Of), Magnet size, Paper Cone and Voice Coil Size, are some of the cheapest I have seen in the industry. Door speakers should at least be a "Two or Three Way" design, to cover a wider range of frequency. Stock ones at best, a weak mid range  design. "Tweeters" in the dash, cannot get them loud enough for good stereo separation. Have the E.Q. treble set at 100%, still lacking........

Will most likely add a Tweeter "Pod" to each windshield "A" Pillar post, when I replace the door speakers.

In 1973, I created a kick-butt audio system in my own custom van, to haul my keyboards to gigs. Using not so easy to find components,(one was a Blaupunkt AM/FM Cassette, with remote control hard wired pendant, from Germany),  and some not meant for car audio (like J.B.L., A.D.S. (Analog & Digital Systems, Boston), and Altec Lansing). My high school friends and musician buddies, soon had me doing their cars as well. Before the car stereo craze took off.

I WILL be replacing at least the speakers in my new GMC this spring. Will document what "OHM" value they are, and diameter. The Ohm speaker resistance is critical, not to cause damage to the amplifiers.

Attached pic of the type of speaker I would consider, but in the proper size and a three way (Mid & Tweeter cone included), would be like this for the doors. Think about a 6" dia. . Has to fit the GM / Bose custom molded plastic door mount bezel.

KICKER _ KS Series 4-inch_ Coax.pdf

Posted

for a few hundred dollars I'm def willing to try this but I've watched the videos online and I'm not convinced at all that I can pull the door panels off without breaking something....and get them back on without creating a gap or rattle somewhere that wasn't there previously

  • Like 1
Posted

it would really be good to see a side-by-side picture of the stock speakers in doors and dash with aftermarket speakers... 

Posted
7 minutes ago, shudog said:

it would really be good to see a side-by-side picture of the stock speakers in doors and dash with aftermarket speakers... 

door speakers. The aftermarket is kenwood KFC-6696s

IMG_0542.jpeg

Posted
8 minutes ago, shudog said:

it would really be good to see a side-by-side picture of the stock speakers in doors and dash with aftermarket speakers... 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, shudog said:

it would really be good to see a side-by-side picture of the stock speakers in doors and dash with aftermarket speakers... 

these are the dash speakers the aftermarket is pioneer TSA-709

IMG_0372.jpeg

Posted
12 minutes ago, shudog said:

it would really be good to see a side-by-side picture of the stock speakers in doors and dash with aftermarket speakers... 

rear speakers factory Bose vs Polk db652

IMG_0670.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,864 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...