Jump to content

Falken A/T4W Discussion

MacA
 Share

Recommended Posts

MacA Enthusiast

MacA

Posted
Posted (edited)

It has been a while since I visited the Forum. Recently I was doing some research on replacement tire options for my 2015 Silverado. My last two sets of tires have been BFGoodrich KO2 in 275/60R20 (33"). For the most part, I have been very pleased with the performance of this tire. The only issue I had was once they started getting close to replacement the ride comfort and wet handling performance deteriorated very quickly. This poor performance started even with reasonable tread width. I kept them rotated every 6k to 8K miles.

 

So, this brings me to the purpose of this thread. After a lot of research, I decided to give Falken WildPeaks a try. I read nothing but high praises for the A/T3W version, but I started seeing reviews on the newer A/T4Ws so I decided to give them a try. Since I didn't find any threads on the forum related to the A/T4Ws I decided to start this thread.

 

I am not a tire performance expert by any means. My following comments are based on how they look and feel. Also, keep in mind I got these installed about 2 weeks ago. 

 

  • Tire Size: 275/60R20, installed on 20" stock Silverado wheels. My Crew Cab is a 4x4 (non-Z71) LTZ model. The only suspension upgrade is a 2.25" ProComp Leveling Kit.
  • I really like the aggressive tread on the A/T4W version. Similar to the 3W, but appears to be more beefy lugs.
  • Tread depth is incredible
  • Very smooth riding. I would have to say better than I remember the KO2s when I first got them.
  • We had a significant rain just after I got them. I noticed excellent handling especially in high standing water areas.
  • I do very little offroading since we moved to Florida, so I have no feedback to provide.

 

I will continue to provide updates as available. If you have installed the A/T4Ws please feel free to provide us your feedback.

 

I'll provide some pics soon! UPDATE: Pic added

2015FalkenAT4W_1.jpg

Edited by MacA
Included Picture
  • Like 1
MacA Enthusiast

MacA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 minutes ago, repairman54 said:

How is the road noise sound level? Are they ''hummers'' ?

Not at all. Similar to the KO2s. Maybe even a little quieter!

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
Brass598 New Member

Brass598

Posted
Posted

I have a 21 Sierra SLT and just bought the Falken ATW4

Has anyone had an issue with seems like tires bouncing 

had the dealer re- Balance them 

seems ok for now 

 

Any info would be greatly appreciated 

 

MacA Enthusiast

MacA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 hours ago, Brass598 said:

I have a 21 Sierra SLT and just bought the Falken ATW4

Has anyone had an issue with seems like tires bouncing 

had the dealer re- Balance them 

seems ok for now 

 

Any info would be greatly appreciated 

 

Mine have been super smooth!

 

You might consider getting your wheels checked. Bent wheel(s) could cause this. Also a high speed balance would be worth checking into.

 

GOOD LUCK! Keep us posted!

MaxenceGiroux New Member

MaxenceGiroux

Posted
Posted
On 4/9/2024 at 4:58 PM, MacA said:

It has been a while since I visited the Forum. Recently I was doing some research on replacement tire options for my 2015 Silverado. My last two sets of tires have been BFGoodrich KO2 in 275/60R20 (33"). For the most part, I have been very pleased with the performance of this tire. The only issue I had was once they started getting close to replacement the ride comfort and wet handling performance deteriorated very quickly. This poor performance started even with reasonable tread width. I kept them rotated every 6k to 8K miles.

 

So, this brings me to the purpose of this thread. After a lot of research, I decided to give Falken WildPeaks a try. I read nothing but high praises for the A/T3W version, but I started seeing reviews on the newer A/T4Ws so I decided to give them a try. Since I didn't find any threads on the forum related to the A/T4Ws I decided to start this thread.

 

I am not a tire performance expert by any means. My following comments are based on how they look and feel. Also, keep in mind I got these installed about 2 weeks ago. 

 

  • Tire Size: 275/60R20, installed on 20" stock Silverado wheels. My Crew Cab is a 4x4 (non-Z71) LTZ model. The only suspension upgrade is a 2.25" ProComp Leveling Kit.
  • I really like the aggressive tread on the A/T4W version. Similar to the 3W, but appears to be more beefy lugs.
  • Tread depth is incredible
  • Very smooth riding. I would have to say better than I remember the KO2s when I first got them.
  • We had a significant rain just after I got them. I noticed excellent handling especially in high standing water areas.
  • I do very little offroading since we moved to Florida, so I have no feedback to provide.

 

I will continue to provide updates as available. If you have installed the A/T4Ws please feel free to provide us your feedback.



Dans le monde des casinos en ligne, caractérisé par un environnement dynamique en constante évolution, l'utilisation de plateformes offrant à la fois plaisir et sécurité est de la plus haute importance. Du point de vue de ceux qui sont passionnés par les jeux d'argent en France, le kings chance casino se distingue comme un lieu considéré comme de grande qualité. Le casino King Chance offre à ses clients une expérience de jeu immersive, une grande variété de jeux parmi lesquels choisir et des remises et promotions alléchantes.

 

I'll provide some pics soon! UPDATE: Pic added

2015FalkenAT4W_1.jpg

How is the road noise sound level?

  • 2 weeks later...
MacA Enthusiast

MacA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 9/25/2024 at 4:34 PM, MaxenceGiroux said:

How is the road noise sound level?

SORRY for the delayed reply!

 

Road noise isn't anything worse than the BFG K02s, and I didn't have any issues with them at the time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • newdude
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By newdude · Posted

      You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • c4racer2
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By c4racer2 · Posted

      just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...