Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I currently have 85,000 miles on the stock shocks and starting to leak. Time for replaceing.  When replacing is it necessary or recommended to replace the front springs? I'm leaning towards keeping the springs as the truck has seen almost entirely on road use, but could be persuaded if there's a real reason. When compressing the springs, are the Parts store rentals ok / safe, or just take the entire assembly to a shop and have them swap it out?

 

Also, other than the adjustable height, any noticable differences between the biltstein 5100 vs 4600?  Truck stays on road most of the time and already has a 1.5 inch level so would be leaving it on the lowest setting, thus leaning towards 4600 but not a fan of the ugly yellow. 

Posted (edited)

Skip the bils... rough ride and not worth it imo.

 

https://eibach.com/product/E60-23-006-03-10?epsid=2260

 

Keep the factory springs if you want to save cost. Otherwise get their springs.

 

***Get a new top cap\ mount and take everything to a shop and have them assemble.

***No compressor an auto parts store has is safe to compress these truck springs. The truck springs have way too much force for the compressors to safely compress our truck springs. Just don't. 

They all bent and one flew off when I did my bils swap.

Edited by Snowcamo
Wording
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Snowcamo said:

Skip the bils... rough ride and not worth it imo.

Sorry, I have to disagree, I went with the Bilstein 5100s all around.
On my 5 1/2" lift, it's never ridden any better, soaks up railroad crossing tracks with little issues. I ,also, have a rear spring lift which makes the rear even stiffer but the 5100s dampen it well.
Just my opinion.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Based on my experience, I think the 4600 bilstein allow more motion than the 5100, this is contrary to internet wisdom that says they are exactly the same. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I replaced the factory Ranchos on my 2015 Z71 with "standard" model 4600's all around (stock truck with no lift, lower, or front level).

The difference in ride quality was AMAZING ....

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, sk said:

I replaced the factory Ranchos on my 2015 Z71 with "standard" model 4600's all around (stock truck with no lift, lower, or front level).

The difference in ride quality was AMAZING ....

Same here with my stock 2018 All-Terrain. 4600's on all four corners and I do not regret that decision one bit. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

To follow up on this, I ended up going with 5100's. I was going to go with 4600 but suprisingly the fronts are nearly non existant or anywhere to be found. Checked numerous on-line retailers and local parts stores and sold out everywhere. No idea why.  That made the decision pretty easy with the 5100's. Got them for a decent price at Shock Surplus, all four for $475. Haven't installed them yet, going to do the rears myself but take it in for the fronts just because compressing those springs scare me. Once they get on I'll let you all know what the ride quality opinoin is.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,979
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 515 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...