Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

Well one thing for sure, you can clearly see the additive companies do the bulk of R&D testing.  Granted, the larger guys like XOM and Shell have access internally to all the Infineum work being it's a jointly owned venture.  Gokhan was a good poster. 

 

A few years ago Roy Howell for Red Line was asked about these specifications.  His answer was pretty funny.  He said they make their oils for all engines old and new.  He basically shrugged off the industry specifications and has kept Red Line full SAPS for decades. 

 

You can see Amsoil Signature Series kind of hovers the middle ground somewhere between off the shelf oils and HPL and Red Line.  They lowered the sulfated ash levels of Signature Series to around 1.04.  Mobil 1, and Castrol Edge are now .7 and .8 (mid saps).

 

HPL's PCMO line have HT/HS numbers more in line with fuel economy grades.  Their 5w30's (non Euro) have HT/HS of 3.2.  No VII is a different animal.     

 

 

Shell and ExxonMobil by law have to stay arms length away from Infineum work.  The IP owned by infineum is its own. 
 

Heres a graph of aniline points for solvency. Dow is trying to sell its oil soluble PAG product but it’s a good reference. Confirming Grumpys commentary on the subject. 
IMG_8861.thumb.jpeg.67d7652ba13046e0b39f42855bd31f08.jpeg

 

 

 

Edited by customboss
Pic
  • Thanks 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

Well one thing for sure, you can clearly see the additive companies do the bulk of R&D testing.  Granted, the larger guys like XOM and Shell have access internally to all the Infineum work being it's a jointly owned venture.  Gokhan was a good poster. 

 

A few years ago Roy Howell for Red Line was asked about these specifications.  His answer was pretty funny.  He said they make their oils for all engines old and new.  He basically shrugged off the industry specifications and has kept Red Line full SAPS for decades. 

 

You can see Amsoil Signature Series kind of hovers the middle ground somewhere between off the shelf oils and HPL and Red Line.  They lowered the sulfated ash levels of Signature Series to around 1.04.  Mobil 1, and Castrol Edge are now .7 and .8 (mid saps).

 

HPL's PCMO line have HT/HS numbers more in line with fuel economy grades.  Their 5w30's (non Euro) have HT/HS of 3.2.  No VII is a different animal.     

 

Not all Red Line HP oils are high SAPS. Look at the Euro line. Mid SAPS and the 5W30 is Porsche C30. 

 

Food for thought.

 

When you build an SAE 30 from a Group II or PAO, what is the HTHS/HTFS viscosity based on? A Newtonian fluid that is also the same viscosity regardless of shear rate and only dependent on temperature. 

 

How about when you build a 5W30 on a Group III/III+ on a 2 to 4 cSt base? HTHS/HTFS is based on the POLYMER which dies under shear. Especially above the HTHS shear rate. 

  • Like 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, customboss said:

Shell and ExxonMobil by law have to stay arms length away from Infineum work.  The IP owned by infineum is its own. 
 

Heres a graph of aniline points for solvency. Dow is trying to sell its oil soluble PAG product but it’s a good reference. Confirming Grumpys commentary on the subject. 
IMG_8861.thumb.jpeg.67d7652ba13046e0b39f42855bd31f08.jpeg

 

 

 

I have good reason to believe AMSOIL is using OSP in its formulations to get that solvency, all of them, low dose but effective. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, customboss said:

Shell and ExxonMobil by law have to stay arms length away from Infineum work.  The IP owned by infineum is its own. 
 

Heres a graph of aniline points for solvency. Dow is trying to sell its oil soluble PAG product but it’s a good reference. Confirming Grumpys commentary on the subject. 
IMG_8861.thumb.jpeg.67d7652ba13046e0b39f42855bd31f08.jpeg

 

 

 

 

How about the Evolve Estolides? Does their 5W30 C3 oil have any solvency? I've seen information in both directions. 

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, customboss said:

I have good reason to believe AMSOIL is using OSP in its formulations to get that solvency, all of them, low dose but effective. 

Interesting.  I know their virgin oxidation value is around 62 for SS, indicating the presence of a good dose of group V.  I wonder if it's OSP that's causing that?  Maybe both? 

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

How about the Evolve Estolides? Does their 5W30 C3 oil have any solvency? I've seen information in both directions. 

I'm not sure how they are doing it.  Probably various estolide formulations that are made to be aniline.

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

Interesting.  I know their virgin oxidation value is around 62 for SS, indicating the presence of a good dose of group V.  I wonder if it's OSP that's causing that?  Maybe both? 

 

 

You won't see OSP at all in traditional testing. Hidden chemistry like many.  However KF can reveal prescence of the additive if water is isolated out. 

https://www.lube-media.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Lube-Tech090-OilSolublePolyalkyleneGlycols.pdf

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I believe there was 48,000 mile 2.7 V6 Chrysler that ran a  PAG ( water soluble) formula very like the 1940's-50's Union Carbide formulations that contained 0.1% or less of Sulf ASH, NO VI, that ran one oil change to 100,000 with no issues but some corrosion from lack of specific additives geared to the modern engines. OSP solves all those issues but its $$$$.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Are we getting the point yet?

 

image.png.5884ce0dae993f25f35f289541c51c42.png

 

The above is what happens in a modern multigrade oil. HOWEVER in a No-VII oil or conventional straight weight the viscosity represented by the HTLS is the same as the HTHS and HTFS and HTUS. The trade is low temperature performance over a mineral single grade but not necessarily a naturally high VI based narrow range multigrade. Bottom line is temperature is the only modifier for a No-VII/Mineral single weight. HUGE viscosity thus WEAR advantage. 

  • Like 2
Posted
58 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Not sure what you mean. You want some of it graphed or you want Cliff Notes of the PDF? :dunno:

Whatever you want to do. I’ll just keep providing raw data as I find it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

On the Russian Oil Club site, their UOA results generally show TBN, TAN and pH.  

 

Here are two where you can see Red Line goes acidic.  It's said due to the high POE.  

 

image.thumb.png.68d661dec0f93f5d6f09c7daaf4e17cd.png

 

image.thumb.png.94398aab8825399ecea82ecd4842445c.png

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I decided to give it a shot and see what sort of a gong show it would be to a pan drop themed oil change on my 2025 gas truck with the 10 speed. All indications I had seen so far was that there was no way that pan was coming out of there due to the cross over exhaust pipe not allowing enough clearance for the back end of the pan to duck out from under the valve body since it hangs lower than the pan to trans mount flange and certainly the filter does. I never touched any of the exhaust mount hardware at all, be that the engine manifolds to Y pipe, the bracket on the side of the transmission, or the two bolt flange further back behind the trans/transfer case. I put the truck up on four jack stands as there was no way I was going to struggle with that lack of clearance under the truck. The truck was cold as it had sat over night so all the trans fluid had drained to the pan, so I drained the bit of oil that would come out of the level check plug at the bottom near the front of the pan and put the plug back in to reduce the ensuing mess after that. Then took out all but one bolt front and rear and then pushed up on the pan and took out the remaining two bolts and then let the front of the pan tilt and spill out most of its contents into a drain pan. I then popped the pan gasket off its two locating nubs and kicked it a bit to the left side so it was no longer on the flange of the pan to get all the clearance I could and managed to get the pan slipped out of there by swinging the front of the pan to the right but keeping the rear part of the pan inline if not slightly to the left of its mounting flange area and lifting the front of the pan enough to keep the rear part of the pan low enough that allowed the pan to "JUST" slip out without forcing anything. I installed a new trans filter and seal and as per GM instructions on this site I torqued the two bolts to that 44 inch pound goal ( they take an 8 mm socket ) In reversing the pan procedure after I had cleaned up the pan both inside and out completely ( touching the outside of a dirty pan and dealing with installing a gasket at the same time would be a disaster ). First I slipped the pan into place and yes it took me a while as it won't go unless its slid in just at the right angles, then once the back of the pan was into the area of the flange mount, I went and got the gasket and then threaded that through the front of the pan and feeding it under the filter etc and finally working it onto the flange of the pan and lining up the two locating nubs to drop into the pan. Then lifted the pan up into place and get a couple of bolts started and check and make sure the gasket is where its supposed to be as the bolts were being put in. I never used any power tools as I don't have any of the whimsy little drive guns, I use what looks like a small screw driver handle with shank that has a 1/4 drive on the end of it and added an extension and those bolts use a 10 mm socket as some times power tools can bite a person if used on delicate parts ( torqued to 80 inch pounds ). Also should note as per rules around pulling the add plug out first, yes I cracked that loose with a 8 mm Allen bit socket on a 3/8 slim head ratchet as there isn't a lot of room to work with there either due to the exhaust on the right side of the trans.    I already had delco ULV oil on hand and of course the quart bottle pump wasn't made for those small cap threads so I had to use some other containers that the pump would fit and keep transferring oil over into them so a wasted exercise there but indeed the small pump did work just fine as ULV oil is thin and easy to pump in summer time weather. I put in 9.5 quarts as per prior minimum recommendation and yes that cut it pretty close as once I had the truck ( off the jack stands so its level ) and the trans oil up to 167f , about 6 ounces came out but a level kit or what have you could throw it off just enough that it wouldn't be enough oil so probably that 10 quarts is a good amount to put in so one doesn't have to add more oil as when its hot I sure wouldn't want to be adding oil so would have to let the exhaust cool. All I do for warming up the transmission is sit there with it in park and rev it to about 2500 rpm and it takes close to 20 minutes to get it up to that lower limit of 167f, weird how it will warm up more doing that then by driving it, I am not real keen on power braking the truck to get the temp up there and don't seem to have to either. By the way I only have 9000 miles on the truck so probably not a very good payback on doing it that soon and the magnets had such a minor thin layer of fines on them so that was good to see and the color of the oil was a darker red then new oil but still looked very good as it should and I've not done any towing with it so its been living a pretty easy life so far. The filter is made in such a way that its next to impossible to pull out the filter media but there certainly was some fines showing up there which makes sense give the trans having to break in.    I hadn't really planned on explaining this much of what I had done since there are various instruction videos kicking around or I think so, as the gist of my message as that by fluke or what have you, for some reason my truck has just enough clearance to slip the pan out from the trans. Of course there is no guarantee that other trucks like this in general will also allow the pan to be taken out without messing with the exhaust as I expect its probably a crap shoot if it will or won't, I was just happy to find out that mine would work and avoid all the other struggling and possibly damaging things in the process,     
    • Do you fellas think Fog Lamps would  be a good upgrade for our 2024 2500 HD Custom ? As you probably know it did not come with them ,  Would you put in GM Chevy parts ? Do they get wired up to the switch panel ( Upfitter or whatever the correct terminology is ) on the dash ? Thanks
    • You got a 4 legged walker or a 4 wheel rollater?
    • Does lowering the truck change its towing capacity?  I wouldn't mind lowering mine, but I loan it out a few times during the summer for my daughter to pull her travel trailer (5,000lbs).
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...