Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is getting ridiculous.

 

20% lower treat rate improved wear control? Not by their own presentation it didn't. 

 

What it said in print isn't what it graphed. More marketing nonsense. Great explanation of how GM, a huge market share driver for Infinium, is driving the bus based on FE (fuel emissions) "CREDITS" issued based on "GOVERNMENT" which is driving small high-pressure motors requiring LSPI protection to limit warranty losses. Wear control is NOT part of the equation. It is part of a LIE. 

 

image.png.d098a350809e1fbbcebf0d6f0292eb84.png

Posted
On 8/31/2024 at 9:09 AM, customboss said:

Grumpy I have data from years of work. I can’t make pretty charts graphs or do math anymore. You might be able to help me present better. If you are willing. You still have a sharp mind. 

 

Okay, batter up. What have ya got? :) 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Okay, batter up. What have ya got? :) 

I’m going slow. Brain workee in am….sometimes. 

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, customboss said:

They’ve always been complex and complicated 

 

Well some oils like Red Line and HPL formulate like it's 1985 LOL. 

 

Some of the newer ashless chemistries have/will/can replace the higher metallics.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, customboss said:

Plus a lot of my data is in boxes. 😳

 

No rush. Whenever you get around to it. Your pace is fine. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, VicFirth said:

 

Well some oils like Red Line and HPL formulate like it's 1985 LOL. 

 

Some of the newer ashless chemistries have/will/can replace the higher metallics.

 

Depends on what you are calling 'Replace'. If you mean 'take the place of" in the mainstream market. Already a done deal. If you are saying replace like 'better', not today, tomorrow or the foreseeable future. 

 

The Hersey number is the dimensionless number obtained from the velocity (m/s) times the dynamic viscosity (Pa∙s = N∙s/m2), divided by the load per unit length of bearing (N/m).

 

Tiny motors with big boost have more than doubled the load per unit length bearing loads. Tall gearing and high count multispeed transmissions or CVT have slowed velocity considerably. And dynamic viscosity is being constantly reduced in the name of fuel efficiency. How far do you think this equation can be compressed before the wear rates become untenable? Hint" they already are. 

 

Add to that GDI fuel dilution, increased water and oil temperatures (reducing dynamic viscosity further), lower oil pump volumes and ridiculous octane recommendations given boosted high compression engines.....lord people, wake up. 10K+ mile OCI"S??? What chemistry do you think is going to counter all that? Nothing anyone knows of. Wear is the ONE area that is being ignored and even sacrificed for C.A.F.E. FINES. If they did, THAT would be the story, Not self-cleaning, 10K mile oil. Almost every make and model in my neighborhood is using oil like they owned the company, and they seem fine with this. The frog has been cooked. The new normal has been achieved by all but the oldest among us. 

 

Multiple blenders have warned that the use of these lightweight oils in even cooler running milder tuned NA motors results in a 30 percent reducing in motor life. Yea, even with fancy new additives. :mad: There is NO more modern metallurgy or clearance or finish that has not been explored since WWII that has yielded a system that keeps the OEM's out of these class action lawsuits for oil consumption and premature wear. :idiot:

 

The SAE specs continue to be 'dumbed down'. The bar ever lower. Cheap cars are history. Simplicity is history. Your pocketbook is history. Gullible Guppies. Get a grip! See Infinium is predicting the death of PAO? GM's bedfellow is whispering the future. 

 

:rant: 

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

I'm running Amsoil or HPL but maybe should be just running this:

 

Dealing with Deposits to Boost Engine Life - Engine Builder Magazine

 

"I had never seen anything like it before, and I have eight years at Valvoline and 16 years at a company that makes the additives used in oil formulation.”

 

"Real-world testing is crucial. For instance, a Ford Mustang was subjected to extensive testing with Restore and Protect, showing significant reductions in wear and deposit formation. The testing extended to various engine components, including the timing chain cover, oil pan, and valvetrain, demonstrating the comprehensive benefits of the oil. The team also ran Restore and Protect in a Ford Explorer with more than 500,000 miles.

“And we also did a chassis dynamometer test where we put a vehicle on rollers basically and ran it 300,000 miles,” Warholic says. “Restore and Protect actually cleaned up the entire engine.”

Edited by VicFirth
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

image.thumb.png.97d4512067ce3e146aec0a2f5ecbda85.png

1.7% fuels dilute is not low. Target is ALWAYS 0.5% or lower via GC.  boron depleting because fuels dilute stresses borate esters. 

 

Silicon still from Hyundai bonding RTV's and cylinder and piston alloys. 

 

Change air filter if not done yet regardless of how it looks and unload the Amsoil to work. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Well one thing for sure, you can clearly see the additive companies do the bulk of R&D testing.  Granted, the larger guys like XOM and Shell have access internally to all the Infineum work being it's a jointly owned venture.  Gokhan was a good poster. 

 

A few years ago Roy Howell for Red Line was asked about these specifications.  His answer was pretty funny.  He said they make their oils for all engines old and new.  He basically shrugged off the industry specifications and has kept Red Line full SAPS for decades. 

 

You can see Amsoil Signature Series kind of hovers the middle ground somewhere between off the shelf oils and HPL and Red Line.  They lowered the sulfated ash levels of Signature Series to around 1.04.  Mobil 1, and Castrol Edge are now .7 and .8 (mid saps).

 

HPL's PCMO line have HT/HS numbers more in line with fuel economy grades.  Their 5w30's (non Euro) have HT/HS of 3.2.  No VII is a different animal.     

 

 

Edited by VicFirth
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On 2021 3500hd it consistently sets automatically when selecting park if the incline/decline is above a certain angle. 
    • Curious, did anyone ever get a fix for the vibration reported here.   I have a 2024 Silverado with 6.6 duramax.   I’m noting the same vibration resonating up through the steering shaft into the steering wheel.    Best way to describe- like someone is tapping on the steering shaft/components and it’s resonating into the steering wheel.    thanks. 
    • Hi friends - first time poster. I have a 2015 sierra Denali with 150k miles, I’m the second owner and she’s given me 75k of great service. I run a pulse AFM disable device. Starting Thursday when I exited the freeway after a short local ride it started idling rough, with an obvious misfire shake and was down on low end power.  I got it home and hooked it up to my scannner and found no codes but in live data a pretty bad misfire on cylinder 5. I replaced the coil, plug and wire with all new OE replacements (Delphi gn10165 coil, acdelco wire and 41-168 plug). It’s still behaving the same way after firing the parts cannon at it.   I know cyl 5 is a non AFM cylinder so I am not thinking this is AFM related but I’m kinda at a loss. injector? Bent pushrod? It’s running too well over 1k rpm to suggest those IMO. Has anyone chase this issue before and what was it? Any suggestions? 
    • 2017 Silverado L83 5.3l 6speed transmission Hello, not a new member but havent posted in a while and my old signup info isnt working so had to create a new account. anyways, I have an issue with my truck and hope someone can spread some light on whats happening: -when it goes to 4cyl mode it makes a clunk sound (but not when coasting or going downhill) -when in 4 cyl mode and under load it makes a load pulsating sound (not a tick). -goes away completely when in M5 gear or when plugging in an AFM delete. Im guessing it is one of 2 things but im not convinced of either to be honest. 1. lifter stuck in v8 mode 2. torque converter shudder realistically it doesn't seem like the TC as there is no physical vibration , and it never happens in v8 mode. but maybe? and wouldnt a lifter make a sound whether with load or not? any ideas let me know please. thank you!  
    • Which has made me wonder with the various engine failures of a few brands in the last few years, is it sub par materials such as lifters etc causing failures, or bearing clearances on the crank etc or perhaps bad designing of an engine physically or causing too much load on the components due to the hp/torque they can push out of them. Or is the oil viscosity and additive package of current oils or a lack of oil flow by an oil pump not able to supply sufficient oil at idle or under high load at low rpm. Or is it every item I listed that combined together has pushed the limits so far to the left that there is hardly a margin of safety left and add in some fuel dilution and too long of an OCI and premature engine failure is the result ?. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...