Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

have a 14 chevy silverado 5.3 LT got code p066d for oil pressure selonid off was told it was my oil pump, well after a 20 hours job i change my oil pump, oil pressure sensor, timing chain and gears added all new filter and oil. started truck up code went away but now my oil pressure is low again. at cold start 40-50 psi and warm 30 psi, once she gets to 210 and drive it when i come to a stop or at idle shes at 16-19 psi i now this is TO LOW for chevy it states atleast 22 psi which i dont have. What could this be? i aslo change the screen in the pressure sensor too so what could be left. NO noise at at not tick everthing else is fine. I did my lifters in 2022.

Posted

Do a 'test block' pressure test. Don't rely on the dash gauge. Start there and see where you land. Here are your targets. Compare to the dash for reference but don't rely on it. 

 

Hot oil pressure minimums.

22 psi @ 1,000 rpm

30 psi @ 2,000 rpm

33 psi @ 3,000 rpm

LV1, LV3, L83, L86 and L96.

  • Like 1
Posted

We placed a manual Guage on it and at cold start she's 40 to 50 and warm she's at 30 at temp 210 at idle she's 16-18 that's where it's to low. After she warms up it has gotten as low at 10. 

Posted

Gm states at warm idle the lowest she can be is 22 psi I'm at 10 to 18 at warm temp 210.

Posted (edited)

How many miles are on this truck? Is the bearing clearance too large from wear? Connecting rod side clearance too large,cam bearings worn out?

Edited by mjm-1957
Posted

188 thousand miles had the lifter done last year and they stated no issuse with bearing or cam... 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Almadean said:

Gm states at warm idle the lowest she can be is 22 psi I'm at 10 to 18 at warm temp 210.

 

What I posted if from @newdude, a GM tech, a few years ago. No mention I can find of a minimum pressure at idle. But 10 psi per thousand is a normal benchmark. Lowest test pressure is at 1K rpm. Why? Because 22 psi is the minimum required to latch the AFM lifters and that can never happen at idle. About 1200 rpm is the lowest the AFM even tries to work. IF you can hit those test pressures at those rpms at full temp your idle pressure is fine. 

  • Like 2
Posted

may have an issue with the VLOM (valley lifter oil manifold), that's where the oil goes to control the AFM, also does this L83 have a vane type oil pump or gear type? (gear type requires alignment). Anyway, I did a AFM/DOD delete on my L83 and modified the VLOM by removing the oil solenoids and forgot to (actually didn't realize) plug the oil galley going to the oil solenoids which'd caused low oil pressure at temp., but after I plugged the port then oil press. was good. So check that for leaks or oil drainage.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Hey man did you ever figure this out? My truck is doing the same thing… low oil pressure at idle after engine reaches temp, 10 psi on the gauge. I replaced the oil pressure sensor and filter screen too… 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...