Jump to content

Brand New 24 Sierra with 3.0L

Memphismatt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Memphismatt Enthusiast

Memphismatt

Posted
Posted

Made it 6 days before I got the Reduced Acceleration message code P2463.  Took back to dealer they did a service regeneration, said soot level was 120%?  How can a truck that's been driven 6 days with 190 miles have 120% soot level in the particulate filter?  I didn't get a keep driving message what happened to self regeneration?  Is there a sensor or ECM problem that missed the regeneration?  Very concerning being so new.

Memphismatt Enthusiast

Memphismatt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No normal in city with probably 40 miles of interstate/highway.  I've kept the rpms fairly low and varied the mph per the manual on break in.  Now most trips have been stop and go short trips but dang 120% soot at 190 miles and brand new.  Hard to wrap my head around that.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Matt Willey said:

No normal in city with probably 40 miles of interstate/highway.  I've kept the rpms fairly low and varied the mph per the manual on break in.  Now most trips have been stop and go short trips but dang 120% soot at 190 miles and brand new.  Hard to wrap my head around that.

 

 

Its possible.  Its not 100% the reason, but the probability is pretty strong.  These modern diesels need heat in them.  Short trips long term kill DPFs.  Need a good highway 55-70mph drive for 20-40 minutes.  

Memphismatt Enthusiast

Memphismatt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes just wondering why I never got the keep driving message first, maybe just a new glitch, she's running great.

Jay P Enthusiast

Jay P

Posted
Posted

How many miles were on the truck when you got it? Lots of short trip test drives could cause the DPF to need a regen with low miles.

  • 2 weeks later...
Memphismatt Enthusiast

Memphismatt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My truck was straight off the trailer, it had 3 miles on it.  The filter was indeed full, and they had to force the service regen.  I haven't had the problem since but have been on the highway a lot the last two weeks.  Overall, that's the only issue and I love this truck and the 25-28 mpg...  That's a solid 7 mpg improvement over the 2020 5.3L

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,724
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    No1UKnow
    Newest Member
    No1UKnow
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,225 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • davester
      Tranmission stays in Low

      By davester · Posted

      get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • asilverblazer
      OCI, not when but why?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • asilverblazer
      Stabilitrak conversion to Z71

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • PunchT37
      Oil Consumption

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...