Jump to content

2010 to a 2024 model year towing question ?

Suregrip391
 Share

Recommended Posts

Suregrip391 Enthusiast

Suregrip391

Posted
Posted

Hi group, I have a 2010 double cab Silverado z71 4x4 with a 5.3 and 3.08 gears. I also pull a 5000 pound fiberglass Escape 5.0 5th wheel camper ( designed for a 1/2 ton). 
 

the truck does not really have a ton of power in the hills and on take off but pulls great otherwise. I attribute that to the gears in the rearend and the number of trans gears. 
 

would I notice a huge difference and be MUCH happier with a newer 2024 Silverado, crew cab, max tow with the 5.3 and the 3.42 gears and 10 speed trans? Noticeable difference? My understanding this has about 35 more HP and about 40ft/pounds more torque then my 2010 5.3. Is this noticeable? 
 

I like the 6.2 engine but too many problems I see guys having with bearings, rods, lifters , etc…….more then just the 5.3 lifters that are out there. 
 

I welcome your input from those who have ad both experiences with the above combos……
 


 

silveradosid Senior Enthusiast

silveradosid

Posted
Posted

regearing your 2010 would have made a big difference, so a new truck with more hp and a 10 speed with 3.42 gear will make a huge difference. the 10 speed will keep the engine in a better operating range

repairman54 Enthusiast

repairman54

Posted
Posted

I went from an '11 5.3 Tahoe with tow package to my '23 6.2 Silverado. Better on fuel by 3-4 mpg and tons more power. 

Old 5.3 had lifter issues on some also. I had zero problems over 150k miles with the old truck with proper full synth. oil changes. 

Going to the 6.2 made the old 5.3 feel like it was a V6. 

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Really comes down to what is cheaper and a better option for you.

 

I would install 3.73's in the 2010 and have the computer tuned. That is far cheaper than buying a new truck.

 

But a new truck with a warranty that has more power and a better transmission is nice too. Just much more money to go that route.

repairman54 Enthusiast

repairman54

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Suregrip391 said:

How is your 6.2 doing? I really want this engine but I keep reading all the issues with rods, bearings and of course the lifters…..too many to count on numerous forums. 

25k miles now, zero issues with drivetrain. Online I read issues with the old 5.3 but it's the internet, you never hear success stories, only issues. I had no issues with the old 5.3 in my Tahoe over 150k miles yet the doom and gloom appeared all the time with cylinder deactivation. Quality synth. oils and proper maintenance are the key to longevity. 

5% of anything made will have defects, the more made the higher numbers appear. I'm not worried about my 6.2. This tank is faster than my '68 GTO.

Edited by repairman54
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 780 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Jsdirt
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jsdirt · Posted

      Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • cautious optimist
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By cautious optimist · Posted

      Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • cautious optimist
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By cautious optimist · Posted

      Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • cautious optimist
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By cautious optimist · Posted

      Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...