Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There is a recall for select 2020+ trucks and SUVs for faulty transmissions that end up with a solenoid failure that leads to the rear wheels locking up while traveling.  What I'm confused about is which transmission is involved.  It's clear to me it's the 10-speed.  What isn't clear to me is how are the 3.0 Duramax trucks recalled but the 6.2 and some 5.3 gas V8s aren't.  According to the document the 3.0 Duramax gets a different 10-speed than the gas trucks?  Can somebody shed some light on this?  I have a 10-speed in my 2020 Trail Boss LT with the 6.2 V8.

Posted

So far its diesels only.  So 10L80 MQB spec'd for the 3.0 Duramax, and the 10L1000s in the big trucks.  

 

There are two p/n 10L80s, one is gas 5.3/6.2, the other 3.0 Duramax.  The valve bodies are different p/ns as well, a gas one and diesel one.  

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, newdude said:

So far its diesels only.  So 10L80 MQB spec'd for the 3.0 Duramax, and the 10L1000s in the big trucks.  

 

There are two p/n 10L80s, one is gas 5.3/6.2, the other 3.0 Duramax.  The valve bodies are different p/ns as well, a gas one and diesel one.  

I was hoping you would respond.  I was always under the impression the 10-speed trans were all the same for the 1500s.  Thank you for your insight.  

Posted

This whole thing seems to be blowing up and I'm going deeper down the rabbit hole.  The video I'm linking was therefore recommended to me by YouTube (link provided below).  While watching it I came upon an interesting comment thread (pics attached).  What I find really interfering is this whole thing popped up on my radar last week without me being aware of it.  Now I'm analyzing in my mind everything I was told by the transmission engineer with a new Bronco that I casually met in the parking lot of my credit union. 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20241114_225002_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20241114_225009_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20241114_225016_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20241114_225027_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20241114_225038_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20241114_225051_YouTube.jpg

Posted

My guess is that GM is in damage mitigation mode and trying to hold back a forced recall that will actually fix the issue but cost many many dollars. 

I was glad to see @newdude chime in about the valve bodys having different PN between diesel and gas. My next question would be do they use the same parts that are failing in the diesel units ? My gut feeling is that they do but the lower torque numbers on the gassers may be gentler on the failing parts.  but it still begs the question of longevity. It sounds like Propulsion has some real issues lately. Another great opportunity for an enterprising person to make lots of money fixing another GM blunder.    Once again GM has assigned tens of thousands of folks the role of "beta tester" 

Posted

This recall is interesting to me as well. I have a refreshed 22.5 model and it is not covered. But I have had a couple of instances on the highway where I've experienced the shudder that is described.  The couple of times it has happened. It has always been when under relatively minor acceleration, for example, using the plus on the cruise control to speed up from 60 to 70 or 65 to 70 or somewhere along those lines. I didn't equate it to a specific gearshift change, but I'm guessing it's the downshift from 10th to 8th. I have about 22,000 miles on my truck currently.

Posted

I understand theres another one on certain trucks that felt like a miss or surge while under a load. It was attributed to an issue in the trans (I dont recall the number) I had this issue on my 2021 with the L8T and 6 speed and of course nobody knew anything about it. Had I kept the truck my plan was to put a billet torque converter in it as soon as the warranty was over. 

Posted

What I read was that the recall is ONLY a software upgrade that tells you there will be an issue.

I will look for that info as usual GM is a POS and not backing up there 70-100K $$ trucks.

Posted
13 hours ago, johnnyquick said:

What I read was that the recall is ONLY a software upgrade that tells you there will be an issue.

I will look for that info as usual GM is a POS and not backing up there 70-100K $$ trucks.

This was my understanding of the recall as well - they aren't actually fixing it, just putting a monitor in place to warn of an impending issue... not sure if this is a stop-gap while they engineer a new part or just lazy.

  • Like 1
Posted

One of the articles indicated that the newer trucks that are not included in the recall already have the problem detection routines in the software. 

Recall adds the newer software to the earlier units.

 

The detection routines are supposed to be able to identify the valves that need changing -- before  the lockup condition occurs. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So is there a timeframe in when they will have the issue with the software update sorted? I've been waiting to pick up a 21 2500hd for a little over a month now. I really like the truck and don't mind waiting, but I'm starting to wonder if and when it will actually be able to be taken off the lot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5,246 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...