Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey All,

 

Current 2014 LTZ Silverado 5.3 got hit and now need to upgrade. Had the truck 10 years and plan to keep next truck 10 years.

 

I've located a 23 Silverado 3.0 I6 RST. It's fully loaded for about 46k with around 30k miles.

 

Is there any reason I should avoid this truck. I only want 23 or higher to ensure the LZ0 engine. My 5.3 gets about 12 MPGs so I'm fairly set on the Duramax.

 

Is there any reason I should explore getting a 24 or 25 for 5-10k more? Anything new in those years I'm missing by getting a 2023?

 

Any and all input is appreciated!

Posted

Changes for 2024

 

Chevrolet Truck Silverado 1500

 
New Features:
(GXP) Lakeshore Blue Metallic exterior paint
(GNO) Slate Gray Metallic exterior paint
(UH5) Rear Seat Belt Indicator
(NPP) Active Exhaust, Dual, sport-mode enabled
(B3L) Assist steps, power retractable, Black, includes LED lighting
(CWK) Dark Appearance Package

 

Changes:
(LZ0) 3.0L Turbo-Diesel engine now available on ZR2
(PPW) Phone projection now standard on WT
(UE1) OnStar now standard on WT
(PQA) WT Safety Package now includes (UD5) Front and Rear Park Assist
(PQB) Safety Package now includes (UD5) Front and Rear Park Assist
(WJP) Midnight Edition now available on High Country
(KSG) Adaptive Cruise Control now standard on High Country

 

Deletions:
(GA0) Northsky Blue Metallic exterior paint
(GLT) Sand Dune Metallic exterior paint

 

 

Changes for 2025 

 

Chevrolet Truck Silverado 1500 Retail and Fleet


New Features:
Exterior color (GBD) Cypress Gray
Exterior color (GJV) Riptide Blue Metallic
(KGU) Universal Vehicle Module

 

Changes:
(K34) Cruise Control is now standard on Work Truck
(JL1) trailer brake controller now standard on 1LT, 2FL, 1SP and 2LT
(CGN) Spray-on Bedliner will have Chevrolet Bowtie Logo on back wall
(FHS) E85 FlexFuel capable now requires 4WD 1WT Crew Cab model
(MI2) 10-speed automatic transmission now requires 4WD 1WT Crew Cab model
(MQB) 10-speed automatic transmission now requires a 4WD model
(R3O) LT275/65R18C blackwall Goodyear Wrangler Territory MT tires now optional on LT Trail Boss
(QAE) 275/60R20 all-terrain, blackwall tires is now standard on LT Trail Boss
(QAQ) spare 255/80R17SL all-season, blackwall tire is now standard on LT Trail Boss
(XCQ) spare 265/70R17SL all-season, blackwall is now optional on LT Trail Boss
(RD1) 18" x 8.5" (45.7 cm x 21.6 cm) machined aluminum wheels with dark painted pockets now optional on LT Trail Boss
(UD5) Front and Rear Park Assist is now standard on ZR2
(RD5) 20" High Gloss Black Aluminum wheel changes to standard on LT Trail Boss
(CWK) Dark Appearance Package no longer available on Custom

 

Deletions:
Exterior color (G6M) Dark Ash Metallic
Exterior color (GLT) Glacier Blue Metallic
Exterior color (GXN) Harvest Bronze Metallic
Exterior color (GXP) Lakeshore Blue Metallic
(UD7) Rear Park Assist
(BN2) Fleet Safety Package
(R5G) (Z82) Fleet LT Trailering Package Delete

 

 

I'd also consider the $ per mile difference when comparing similar trucks from different years. 

 

There can also be significant differences in the option packages -- no matter what trim levels are being looked at.

 

If I need to get a different truck this week, it will be another (sierra)  LZO.

 

 

How is the truck used / what was the 2014 used for?

Posted

Thanks for those details! I'm not seeing any major changes for the engine or transmission unless I missed one.

 

This is my daily driver. I'm mainly hauling lumber and equipment from the truck bed for projects and work. Get up to mountains every winter for a few weeks in snow but other than that it's sunny San Diego weather. Trails sometimes inland to the desert but nothing crazy in terms of off roading.

 

You know I should look at the Sierra closer. Is it priced the same as Silverado? Is there an RST variant of GMC?

Posted

GMC will cost more than Chevy.  Watch out for the transmission.  Make sure the recall was done since there was an issue with the 10-speed mates to the 3.0 Duramax.  At 200,000 there's a belt service that requires dropping the transmission since the belt is on the back.

Posted (edited)

I just test drove a 2025 RST Duramax at lunch. It's a beauty for sure. Felt great. Brand new with incentives is 50k for non 4x4. That's pre tax of course. So now 46k loaded 4x4 2023 with 30k miles or brand new non 4x4 for 50k....

 

Thanks for tip on transmission. Do you know what year the recall was on? Assuming all years with the 10 speed.

 

 

Edited by Bowtie619

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I toggled my updates off a couple of years back. Since I don't have any CEL activity and the truck runs fine I'm happy to refrain from rolling the dice. I figure they've got it as good as it's gonna get. Recalls are another matter and I will strongly consider those if I get a notice in the mail.
    • We'll know soon. But at the end of the day they'll likely not take owner aggravation and costs into consideration. Probably the most important factor to them will be bottom line, along with units sold. Did they make money off sales of AFM/DFM-equipped vehicles? If yes, and the margin was large enough in spite of warranty and recall costs, I don't know that they will consider much else. Aside from government involvement of course, as in EPA and other regulatory bodies.
    • HM oils and cleaning. Well, soft deposits yes, perhaps. Like you say esters are present in in theory that should be a plus. But, is there enough? 🤔 The marker is the "Aniline Point" and it has to be pretty low to solve out baked on deposits. The softer sludge, yea, they do that and that is the claim. Valvoline R&P is the only HM oil I know of (Jury is out on Mobil 1's product) whose chemistry is uniquely able to remove the hard stuff and not be so aggressive as to swell seals to uselessness.    Oxidation levels in virgin oils blends is a good indicator of ester level and higher is generally a lower Aniline number and at one time we could predict without the $400 aniline test it's effectiveness. AN's, alkylated naphthalene doesn't show up in the oxidation test but does show in the aniline test and has become sort of a cheaper go to but most oils only add enough to solve the additive package. Not nearly enough to clean the harder carbon materials.   To your second question about does it matter. Yes is the short answer. Deposits are insulative. Those under the piston crown for example add octane requirement for knock free running. We don't' normally notice in todays motors due to Knock sensor driven ignition R-e-t-a-r-d. At least until the full slate of available values is consumed. Newer motors also often use oil jets to cool the piston to achieve tunes that would otherwise not be possible. Deposits on either side subtract from that. Deposits in fine screens used in VVT/VVL or DFM/AFM services live and die on cleanliness and screens are front and center. Vacuum pumps as well like brake booster in the K2's.    90% of todays oils are Group II+/III blends. A few more at PAO/AN/Group II's. A few boutique oils not Walmart shelf materials have enough solvency to prevent but not remove the hard stuff. R & P the current exception. Even HPL's EC30/40 used as directed (20% max) will get the soft stuff and some varnish out but not the hard stuff.    That orange varnish isn't baked on oil. Those are fuel varnishes left when the fuel diluted in the oil drops out when the oil cools. Like sugar does in a saturated mix of sugar and water that is put into the frig. That is ring sticking material and a glue the binds hard carbon sometimes.    Name brand shelf oils are intended to provide a useful service life at the least cost and highest benefit to the OEM who is trying very hard to keep you in $500 a month payment programs where the real money is made.   Did I miss anything you asked or left unsatisfied?        
    • Yes, I understand. And I was saying (poorly), that it popped up on the DIC when I didn't have that info screen up. Just like you, but for a different maintenance issue. And just like yours mine didn't need to be shown at that time.
    • Ugh, amateurs.   But I did learn HM seal conditioners are esters.   I'm curious about deposit removal - some of the HM oils claim they really clean stuff up, the old and hard to reach stuff, and that's great? To Grumpy's point, a good oil should already be keeping the house pretty clean. I assume there are hard to reach places (underside of pistons?) and things that just accumulate baked-on oil and combustion vapors. If the deposits aren't friction or combustion surfaces and the deposit is just normal "seasoning", is it actually important to remove it?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...