Jump to content

2024 Silverado rear left seat belt

ryanm33
 Share

Recommended Posts

ryanm33 Enthusiast

ryanm33

Posted
Posted

Does anyone have a fix for the left rear seat belt buckle pushing down into the seat when trying to buckle? The other 2 seat belts in the rear seat are rigid and can easily be buckled. My 6 year old buckle her seat belt with it this way. I did see some things on Amazon that helped to hold the buckle up but I was skeptical on how they would work. I thought I found a thread on this issue  a few days ago, but I can’t find it again. 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

Yes.  Don't lift your rear seat up.  Otherwise, make sure you pull the buckle up and through when you lower your seat after going under it. 

ryanm33 Enthusiast

ryanm33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I am looking for something to keep it rigid so that when she pushes her belt into the buckle, it will support itself instead of pushing down into the seat. It’s Not an issue of it getting trapped below the seat when it’s lifted. She is 6 and is still in a booster seat, if it was more rigid she would not have a problem. In My 2015 the buckle was rigid on all three buckles and she could do it herself  
 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

Are you sure it wasn't broken by accident?  No issues with mine, and I've had 3 kids all is that same seatbelt in my truck.  My youngest is currently 8.  Maybe you have a safety defect that might be covered under warranty?

99silveradoz71 Senior Enthusiast

99silveradoz71

Posted
Posted

My son sits in the left rear of my 24 as well and struggles with the same problem.  I'll have to check my other rear belts too.

ryanm33 Enthusiast

ryanm33

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, Transient said:

Are you sure it wasn't broken by accident?  No issues with mine, and I've had 3 kids all is that same seatbelt in my truck.  My youngest is currently 8.  Maybe you have a safety defect that might be covered under warranty?

 No accidents, they way it came from factory 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...