Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello.  I own a 2020 GMC Sierra high country 6.2l with 112k miles, bought used at 93k last year.  

 

I purchased the extended warranty, which really panned out.  I've used $17,000 worth of that warranty in ONE YEAR!

 

at 96k miles, whining from transmission.  Was caused by idler gear walking off the bearing within transmission.  Gear and pump replaced. 

 

At 110K oil pan leak.  Resealed.

 

At 112k, slight slip at low rpm slow speed.  Transmission replaced. 

 

I am very concerned about the quality of the transmission in this vehicle. It seems no matter how well they are cared for they will fail. 

 

Is there anyone with high miliage 10l80 out there?  If so what have you done?

 

Do you think this new transmission will have more longevity?  

 

I am seriously considering getting rid of this thing and buying a toyota.

I've owned bmws with less issues. 

 

What are your thoughts?  Thanks. 

 

 

Posted

Well, the first one made it to 112,000mi.  No reason the new one shouldn't get to that if not much more.  

 

Early 10 speeds had the oil pump drive gear issue.  They don't "walk" so much as they'd develop play in them and if it was bad enough, start eating the gear teeth.  They updated that for 2022.  Any new or reman GM transmissions after that point have an updated gear.    The TSB - 22-NA-232 1..3

 

Otherwise, plenty that come to work with over 100,000mi that have never had work done aside from fluid changes.  

Posted
On 4/20/2026 at 9:34 PM, 2020truck said:

Hello.  I own a 2020 GMC Sierra high country 6.2l with 112k miles, bought used at 93k last year.  

 

I purchased the extended warranty, which really panned out.  I've used $17,000 worth of that warranty in ONE YEAR!

 

at 96k miles, whining from transmission.  Was caused by idler gear walking off the bearing within transmission.  Gear and pump replaced. 

 

At 110K oil pan leak.  Resealed.

 

At 112k, slight slip at low rpm slow speed.  Transmission replaced. 

 

I am very concerned about the quality of the transmission in this vehicle. It seems no matter how well they are cared for they will fail. 

 

Is there anyone with high miliage 10l80 out there?  If so what have you done?

 

Do you think this new transmission will have more longevity?  

 

I am seriously considering getting rid of this thing and buying a toyota.

I've owned bmws with less issues. 

 

What are your thoughts?  Thanks. 

 

 

I’d be more concerned with the 6.2. 2020 seems to be when their problems started.

Posted (edited)
On 4/25/2026 at 7:32 AM, KARNUT said:

I’d be more concerned with the 6.2. 2020 seems to be when their problems started.

Best I can figure, the issue centers around bad bearings, and over chamfered oil holes on the crank. Along with poor crank finish.  If my truck had an engine problem it would have manifested itself by now.  When the pan was removed the dealer checked for heat signs.  There were none.  On Top of that the oil has been changed religiously at 5000mi.   If anything was going to happen, it would have. 

 

But your comment highlights another one of my concerns. 

Edited by 2020truck
  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/25/2026 at 7:27 AM, newdude said:

Well, the first one made it to 112,000mi.  No reason the new one shouldn't get to that if not much more.  

 

Early 10 speeds had the oil pump drive gear issue.  They don't "walk" so much as they'd develop play in them and if it was bad enough, start eating the gear teeth.  They updated that for 2022.  Any new or reman GM transmissions after that point have an updated gear.    The TSB - 22-NA-232 1..3

 

Otherwise, plenty that come to work with over 100,000mi that have never had work done aside from fluid changes.  

Yes, I saw this first hand.  

The bill to repair a bad idler gear and pump is $4600 at a dealer. 

 

I am wondering if the latest valve body is really better than the original.  These transmissions are not cheap. 

 

Do yiu know of any high miliage transmissions with the updated vb?   I think it's fairly new. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I bought a used 2021 Suburban 6.2 HC in May of 2024 with 70,000 miles. I had to put in a new trans at 80,000. I don't know the maintenance done but after using the Dexron ULV, I am going to be replacing fluid at least every other year. You have to shake it before using it. It is like pink water. I am not very confident in its long term use. I think the additives wear out. I am going to be installing a larger pan with a drain plug. Next Gen transmission has some interesting articles.

Posted (edited)
On 5/11/2026 at 12:04 PM, Jerry455 said:

I bought a used 2021 Suburban 6.2 HC in May of 2024 with 70,000 miles. I had to put in a new trans at 80,000. I don't know the maintenance done but after using the Dexron ULV, I am going to be replacing fluid at least every other year. You have to shake it before using it. It is like pink water. I am not very confident in its long term use. I think the additives wear out. I am going to be installing a larger pan with a drain plug. Next Gen transmission has some interesting articles.

I think the 24 still had the old bad VB.  Also, from what I've heard the mobile 1 ulv is better than ac delco.  Yea its a real shame on GM for what they have done. 

 

The 21 had thr bad vb and bad idler 

Edited by 2020truck
Posted
2 hours ago, Jerry455 said:

I would be surprised if AC Delco ULV is not a Mobil fluid.

 

 

Its not.

 

Phillips 66 Lubricants makes it.  

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...