Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been doing some maintenence (oil, fuel filter, etc) and decided to pull my MAP sensor.  Truck has 21,xxxkm (13k miles).  It was fairly plugged up.  Its simple to remove.  I popped the hood, waited an hour to make sure the truck was sleeping, popped the connector off, took out the 10mm bolt, cleaned the soot off with MAF sensor cleaner, let it dry for 30 minutes and reinstalled.  Will likely start doing this at every oil change.20260511_122605.thumb.jpg.ecd042170d683e4e4f5bd755186674a3.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Can anyone find the GM bulletin that stated the carbon build up was normal and does not affect performance?

 

I KNOW there used to be one, but can't find it anymore. 

 

Meanwhile, I posted recently about mine having a BUNCH of miles on it and never pulling it, because of the above and no adverse issues otherwise. 

 

I probably will at some point just to see...

Posted

I cleaned both of my sensors and installed the banks sensor relocation kit:

 

The kit takes the sensors out of the soot stream.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.c313c811bf769dfaa0928936a6f200ca.jpeg

Posted (edited)
On 5/11/2026 at 8:37 PM, Crazy Canuck said:

 Will likely start doing this at every oil change.

 

 

You'd be better off replacing the sensor and getting a MAP spacer.  

 

Seen many at work where the customer tried to clean it only to have it be replaced.  Does more harm than good.  

Edited by newdude
Posted
On 5/12/2026 at 11:58 AM, asilverblazer said:

Can anyone find the GM bulletin that stated the carbon build up was normal and does not affect performance?

 

I KNOW there used to be one, but can't find it anymore. 

No one?

 

6 hours ago, newdude said:

You'd be better off replacing the sensor and getting a MAP spacer.  

 

Seen many at work where the customer tried to clean it only to have it be replaced.  Does more harm than good.  

When/if I clean mine, depending on the results, that would be my course of action.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...