Jump to content

Switching to Lurker Mode....


ToeJam

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well folks, I sold my Sierra last Sunday and bought a Ford (see sig). A number of factors made me take the plunge. My wife would say the biggest factor is that I have a habbit of buying new rides every two years. She's probably right...but another factor is I'm now lifting a car seat for my seven-week old son in and out of the truck and the extended cab just isn't cutting it. Add in four problems with my truck in one week and it was time to pull the trigger on a new rig. One of the problems the dealership couldn't find, one they fixed (and re-appeared two days later), and two require ordering parts (two weeks and six weeks back order).

 

I started looking at 2500 crew cabs a few weeks ago, but the problems I've had lately (with the truck and local dealership) pushed me away from GM for now. Growing up my family was "GM or die" hardcore and I'm sure I'll own another GM again in the future. But for now, I'm driving a feeerd.

 

Anyway, I'll still hang out, lurk and chime in when able. You've all been a great group of people and this is a great board so there is no reason to leave all together. I'll share my experiences with my F-150 (good and bad) and hopefully we can continue to have healthy debates...

Posted
Well folks, I sold my Sierra last Sunday and bought a Ford (see sig).  A number of factors made me take the plunge.  My wife would say the biggest factor is that I have a habbit of buying new rides every two years.  She's probably right...but another factor is I'm now lifting a car seat for my seven-week old son in and out of the truck and the extended cab just isn't cutting it.  Add in four problems with my truck in one week and it was time to pull the trigger on a new rig.  One of the problems the dealership couldn't find, one they fixed (and re-appeared two days later), and two require ordering parts (two weeks and six weeks back order). 

 

I started looking at 2500 crew cabs a few weeks ago, but the problems I've had lately (with the truck and local dealership) pushed me away from GM for now.  Growing up my family was "GM or die" hardcore and I'm sure I'll own another GM again in the future.  But for now, I'm driving a feeerd.

 

Anyway, I'll still hang out, lurk and chime in when able.  You've all been a great group of people and this is a great board so there is no reason to leave all together.  I'll share my experiences with my F-150 (good and bad) and hopefully we can continue to have healthy debates...

 

 

 

 

 

Well good luck to ya, I don't care what ya drive, im not brand loyal. ....as long as its not an import...

 

 

DO you ya mind telling us why you went with the ford, and what options did you get.

Posted
DO you ya mind telling us why you went with the ford, and what options did you get.

 

 

 

 

Sure...I basically ruled GM out for now because of the number of problems I've had with the truck and the dealership. The Nissan Titan gets great reviews by the car rags, but I've owned a Nissan before and was not impressed. Besides, they're just too ugly for me and their interior makes me want to go postal. There is no way I'd EVER buy a Dodge, so that just leaves Ford and Toyota. I drove a Toyota Tundra and was pretty impressed. An article I read online sums it up correctly in five words "It's a 7/8 scale truck".

 

So that leaves Ford. My best friend just traded in his company-provided 1999 F-150. He works for a company that distributes building block, bricks and pavers (Mutual Materials). I'm a witness to him hauling 1,000+lbs in the back of his truck weekly and his ski boat on weekends. He put 150,000 miles on the 4.6ltr V8 and only had one problem (a $200 part at 75,000 miles). So when my local Ford dealership offered me invoice on the Ford and $1,000 over KBB value on my GMC, I jumped at it.

 

As for options, it is pretty loaded (too many to list). Upgraded stereo, tires, interior, tow package, etc....

Posted

d**n lurkers. Always staring at my posts like that...Never saying anything. Kinda weirds me out. :chevy:

 

Friends don't let friends become lurkers. :lol:

 

 

 

We don't care what you drive man, but we do enjoy your company...Stick around.

 

 

Congrats on the new truck :D

Posted
d**n lurkers. Always staring at my posts like that...Never saying anything. Kinda weirds me out.  :cheers:

 

Friends don't let friends become lurkers. :D

We don't care what you drive man, but we do enjoy your company...Stick around.

 

 

 

 

Yeah, don't lurk-post away! I crossed over and still hang around here. Sounds like a nice F150 you got-I really like them. Post a photo if you get time!

Posted

congrats on the new truck :cheers: I am with you on the Dodge, test drove a 4x4 last year and really did not care for the way the truck handled. You planning to do any mods to the Ford?

Posted

We'll, I'll definitely be hanging out. The Ford boards are a bit boring.

 

I'll post some pics once I get the SnugTop canopy on the back. The only mods I have planned for now (besides the canopy) is a Line-X, which was put in last weekend. I had a Rhino in my last truck and I wasn't impressed with how well it held up, so I'm trying the X now.

Posted

Hey Toe....does Ford still give you shares in Exxon with every purchase.......the ford work truck I have gets 10 miles to the gallon........good luck. :wtf:

Posted
Hey Toe....does Ford still give you shares in Exxon with every purchase.......the ford work truck I have gets 10 miles to the gallon........good luck. :wtf:

 

 

 

 

What kind is it-model, year, engine etc?

 

Mine gets 11/12 mixed driving and between 14 and 15 highway. About what I expected from a 7000lb 4x4 pickup with a 415cube/425lb-ft engine. That's similar & sometimes a little better than alot of guys with GM 3/4 & 1 ton 6.0L and 8.1Ls and Dodge 2500s with a Hemi engine. If want to do better than that with any 3/4 or 1 ton pickup you pretty much have to spend the $$ and get a diesel!

 

The guys I know locally with 5.4L F150s get 14 to 19mpg, which seems about the same as GM 5.3L and 4.8Ls. I owned a 2001 Silverado Z71 5.3L, ext cab with 4.10 axle and for mixed driving it hovered around 14/15mpg and 16/17mpg highway.

 

If you're just poking a little fun at the competition that's cool! :D But if you're trying to seriously say Ford pickups get worse mpg on average than the GM/Dodge, I ain't buyin' it! :D

Posted

Hillhound,

 

I was stuck with ford as an work truck for the place i work at and i aint gonna lie, it was a gas hog, the truck they gave me before it got replaced with my new GMC was an F150, 5.4 double cab...hell i think i got 10 to 15 mpg and it had around 70 some thousands miles on it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...