Jump to content

Seat Lift Kit


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a set of these but have not installed them yet. The only concern I have is with the strength of the brackets, as the seat belt is anchored in the seat itself, and that in turn bolted down to the floor rails. I would not sell or trade in the truck with this modification. I agree that the seats on pre '07 trucks are too low.

Posted
Ive got to have this.. have always thought mine sat to low and so does everyone else.. kindof pricey though

I little pricey yes but somebody went to a lot of trouble coming up with all of the right pieces... Probably worth it rather than making your own.

Posted
Ive got to have this.. have always thought mine sat to low and so does everyone else.. kindof pricey though

I little pricey yes but somebody went to a lot of trouble coming up with all of the right pieces... Probably worth it rather than making your own.

 

 

 

Yeah I don't think the price is to bad considering it is a custom made item. My concern is that the front supports don't look like they have much surface area to them. The backs look fine. Also the front bolts don't have many threads holding them on. Might be ok though...

Posted

The brackets are fine for securing the seat unless you weigh more than 500 lbs. The concern is with the ability of these brackets to resist large deceleration forces in an accident scenario. Also, if one was involved in an accident and the brackets failed and the seat was thrown violently forward, one could not hold the manufacturer responsible, as this is an unauthorized modification to the safety system of the truck, since the seat belt is a part of the seat itself. If the seatbelts were anchored in the side pillars, there would be no issue at all.

 

It seems that using thick walled metal bushings, along with longer grade 8 bolts would be safer - as there is no bracket to break apart. The bushings would serve only as a support to raise the seat and the hardened bolt would have to shear for the mount to fail. I just may try to approach it that way.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
    • Brought my 2015 Colorado into the dealership to check my touch screen issues, had that ghost touch thing happening. They said I needed a new touch screen and they could either order me one for $500. The lady at the service deck was nice enough to tell me I could order a touch screen online for less, she did stipulate that the touch screen had to be factory OEM, you can't pair an aftermarket screen to my radio seeing it was 2015, it had to be a GM factory OEM only. I found a few on Amazon and Ebay by the numbers on the back of the old screen, DJ080PA-01A GM# 22740886, Some said "OEM" in the description and others just said "Replacement". Would a replacement be the same as a OEM as long as it had the same numbers on the back of the screen? In some of the descriptions they also show different brand names but same numbers, is that an issue?  
    • I have both but typically use the 4 legged walker (wheels on front, ski's on back).   The four wheeler is starting to be used on "longer" outdoor walks.  The 4 legged walker is particularly helpful in practicing good walking posture.  Both of my knees are at different stages of recovery and I'm trying to not develop poor habits.  I can actually manage with a cane but it's very difficult not to favor one leg over the other.  My PT recommends I continue with my 4 legged walker for a while.  Yesterday was four weeks since my last knee replacement and I'm excited about my progress to date.  It has been a hell of a rough journey so far but it is exciting to witness  systematic and continuous improvement.  I went for years watching the decline of my "mobility".  It seems that everyday now I am alerting my wife to something I can do now that I couldn't a day or two ago!  I encourage anyone facing the prospect of knee replacement to share any concerns with others who have had the surgery.  It isn't an instant fix but rather is a considerable amount of short term pain for long term gain.  Recovery time and pain levels vary for individuals post surgery but the end results are typically very positive and I've never encountered anyone regretting having had the surgery. 
    • The lifter issue can be dealt with by shorter oil changes and quality oil IMO.
    • Got heavy rain, hail and light rain yesterday. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...