Jump to content

E-85 Availability


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, gasoline is up past $3.00/gallon again. I just don't get it here in Michigan. This is the backyard of GM products (who are now putting out quite a few flex fuel vehicles, with ford starting to follow suit) and our Governer is constantly taking about pushing the development of alternative fuels / energy for the "new" Michigan economy, but I still have to drive 20 miles to get to the closest station that carries E-85. What gives? I know we have a couple of ethanol plants now in Michigan, where in the heck is all of the production going? :tear:

 

Is it like this in other states, or is Michigan just "special"?

Posted

Well, its not really that available because there isn't much of it. It takes a lot of corn (which is mostly whats being used right now in the US to make it), and there was already a tight market for corn (see: food) before E-85. Wait for people to realize there are better ways to get ethanol, then there will be more stations.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

i dont get the fuel industry. brazil runs a vast majority of their vehicles on ethanol produced by sugarcane. sawgrass, a weed, produces significantly more ethanol per bushel than corn. however, we use a substaintal food source to get our fuel. why are we so retarded?

Posted

E85 is readily available here but the fuel mileage you get with it sucks so bad very few are using it. Since it is always exactly (only) 30 cents a gallon less, there is no reason to buy it.

Posted
why are we so retarded?

Because almost every one of us is an Exxon Mobil stockholder. If you have a 401K or insurance, you're instantly relying on oil industry money. It's so interwoven into everything we do or buy that it makes all of the decisions. No surprise that they don't "choose" alternative fuels.

Posted
i dont get the fuel industry. brazil runs a vast majority of their vehicles on ethanol produced by sugarcane. sawgrass, a weed, produces significantly more ethanol per bushel than corn. however, we use a substaintal food source to get our fuel. why are we so retarded?

 

Well, we use corn because that is what we are already growing. They use sugarcane and saw grass because that is what they already had.

Posted

i question. the sugarcane probably. sawgrass grows significantly faster, cheaper, and easier to grow than corn, has more significantly more ethanol producing capability than corn, and it doesnt take away the food source that using corn does.

 

what is even funnier is that we, as tax payers, fund a percentage of farmers to keep their fields empty and not produce so that the price of corn/wheat/etc stays at market price (if all farmers were able to grow, food grains prices would plumit and farmers would be out of work). what we should be doing is convincing these farmers to grow sawgrass instead of nothing, and buy the grass from them at teh same market value that corn goes for. this would prevent corn farmers from becoming sawgrass farmers for higher profits, we continue to grow enough food crops, and we have a significantly higher ethanol yield

Posted
i question. the sugarcane probably. sawgrass grows significantly faster, cheaper, and easier to grow than corn, has more significantly more ethanol producing capability than corn, and it doesnt take away the food source that using corn does.

 

what is even funnier is that we, as tax payers, fund a percentage of farmers to keep their fields empty and not produce so that the price of corn/wheat/etc stays at market price (if all farmers were able to grow, food grains prices would plumit and farmers would be out of work). what we should be doing is convincing these farmers to grow sawgrass instead of nothing, and buy the grass from them at teh same market value that corn goes for. this would prevent corn farmers from becoming sawgrass farmers for higher profits, we continue to grow enough food crops, and we have a significantly higher ethanol yield

 

I think its funny how that always comes up. At least you understand that if that didn't happen, farmers would be out of work and everyone would starve. Most people think that the money is just the farmers being lazy and wanting a free handout. And its not as simple as convincing the farmers to switch the land that "nothing" is grown on to something that they can make money off of. The government gets a little pissy when farmers are using more land than they want them to. The more land that is used for producing crops, there is more water used. This water doesn't always come from the sky. Most of it comes from wells, which, eventually, will run out. So more crops over more land=less water in the long run for food. Also, this also increases the risk of having another dust bowl, since most of the land not being used is considered dry land, and the only way it gets water is when it rains. Rain is a gamble. West Texas right now is really, really dry. My dad, a farmer, has already written off his dry land for this year. Even if it was to rain tonight, the dry land crops are too far gone. So, really, the best idea would be to scrap the food crops for ethanol and concentrate on using other plants that we don't already rely on and that don't require alot of water. Harvesting the methane from dairies/feedlots/hog farms would also be a good idea and is in practice in some areas.

 

Really, I just want a nuclear power plant I can put in my truck.

Posted

Come visit a farmer in the corn belt. Tell them about how switchgrass or sugar cane is a better feedstock for ethanol protection. Then tell them they need to stop using their planters, plows, cultivators, sprayers, combines, augers, wagons, trucks, grain bins, silos, etc. THEN tell them they need to go out and buy all new equipment.

 

You'll either get laughed off their property or thrown off of it. :(

 

Right or wrong, the infrastructure is set up for grains.

Posted
Come visit a farmer in the corn belt. Tell them about how switchgrass or sugar cane is a better feedstock for ethanol protection. Then tell them they need to stop using their planters, plows, cultivators, sprayers, combines, augers, wagons, trucks, grain bins, silos, etc. THEN tell them they need to go out and buy all new equipment.

 

You'll either get laughed off their property or thrown off of it. :(

 

Right or wrong, the infrastructure is set up for grains.

Nick makes a good point. I don't think we'll ever produce enough E85 to make a real dent in the oil industry. It's gonna take new and better alternative fuel technology to do that.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Well, gasoline is up past $3.00/gallon again. I just don't get it here in Michigan. This is the backyard of GM products (who are now putting out quite a few flex fuel vehicles, with ford starting to follow suit) and our Governer is constantly taking about pushing the development of alternative fuels / energy for the "new" Michigan economy, but I still have to drive 20 miles to get to the closest station that carries E-85. What gives? I know we have a couple of ethanol plants now in Michigan, where in the heck is all of the production going? :withstupid:

 

Is it like this in other states, or is Michigan just "special"?

 

Well, since ethanol cannot be pumped through the existing pipeline system as gasoline and diesel products, it has to be trucked in. And that puts lots of limitations on where it will get marketed. It also makes the price of ethanol much more volatile since they are using diesel trucks to deliver the stuff. Ethanol is the biggest government boondoggle yet...period. Nice try, but Americans are fed up with this hippie environmental lobbyist crap. Let's get with the program and build some modern, safe nuclear and clean burning coal fired power plants, drill our own oil off the coast and up in Alaska and tell the middle east to keep their overpriced oil. I'm sure china will buy up whatever we don't.

Posted
Well, gasoline is up past $3.00/gallon again. I just don't get it here in Michigan. This is the backyard of GM products (who are now putting out quite a few flex fuel vehicles, with ford starting to follow suit) and our Governer is constantly taking about pushing the development of alternative fuels / energy for the "new" Michigan economy, but I still have to drive 20 miles to get to the closest station that carries E-85. What gives? I know we have a couple of ethanol plants now in Michigan, where in the heck is all of the production going? :cheers:

 

Is it like this in other states, or is Michigan just "special"?

 

You think you got it bad....California has only 4 stations available...I have to drive 35 miles one way if I want E85...but I still do do it! Conserv Fuels in Brentwood CA makes their E85 out of Beer and Liquor....it's f'n awesome. Now both my truck and I are drunks! Honestly though We need more ethanol out here, it can be made out of just about anything, and in Los Angeles we pay .90 cents less a gallon for E85 so I feel it's worth it! Gives us more ethanol!!!!!!

Posted
Well, gasoline is up past $3.00/gallon again. I just don't get it here in Michigan. This is the backyard of GM products (who are now putting out quite a few flex fuel vehicles, with ford starting to follow suit) and our Governer is constantly taking about pushing the development of alternative fuels / energy for the "new" Michigan economy, but I still have to drive 20 miles to get to the closest station that carries E-85. What gives? I know we have a couple of ethanol plants now in Michigan, where in the heck is all of the production going? :cheers:

 

Is it like this in other states, or is Michigan just "special"?

 

Well, since ethanol cannot be pumped through the existing pipeline system as gasoline and diesel products, it has to be trucked in. And that puts lots of limitations on where it will get marketed. It also makes the price of ethanol much more volatile since they are using diesel trucks to deliver the stuff. Ethanol is the biggest government boondoggle yet...period. Nice try, but Americans are fed up with this hippie environmental lobbyist crap. Let's get with the program and build some modern, safe nuclear and clean burning coal fired power plants, drill our own oil off the coast and up in Alaska and tell the middle east to keep their overpriced oil. I'm sure china will buy up whatever we don't.

 

I've not read this entire thread so I apologize in advance for the sake of repeating previous comments, but ethanol is not the magic bullet that some think it is. Many of us were and continue to be, "Blinded by Science" (as Thomas Dolby put it back the 80s) that ethanol is a renewable resource that would allevate our energy dependence on foreign oil. Many articles on the subject, but an interesting read is found at:

http://www.farmgate.uiuc.edu/archive/2008/...if_you_wok.html

 

Due to the powerful farm lobbies (namely corn growers) and the multinational giant Archer-Daniels Midland, we are where we are today. Switchgrass is not the cure-all either. Yes, the raw product is cheaper to produce as it is a perennial crop instead of an annual, but the technology just isn't there yet to convert it into ethanol as easily or inexpensively as corn plus the storage/delivery problems to plant are challenging. You could convert the most of the cropland in OK to switchgrass and if every bit of it were grown for ethanol, it really wouldn't make much of a dent in our fuel reserves. And who would grow the lost production in hard red winter wheat instead?

 

Yes coal, nuclear, wind, solar energies are proven techologies that need to be expanded plus let's not forget some common sense conservation measures. Personally, I'm sick and tired of hugging those camel jocks in the mideast just for "reasons of national security". :lol:

Posted
i question. the sugarcane probably. sawgrass grows significantly faster, cheaper, and easier to grow than corn, has more significantly more ethanol producing capability than corn, and it doesnt take away the food source that using corn does.

 

what is even funnier is that we, as tax payers, fund a percentage of farmers to keep their fields empty and not produce so that the price of corn/wheat/etc stays at market price (if all farmers were able to grow, food grains prices would plumit and farmers would be out of work). what we should be doing is convincing these farmers to grow sawgrass instead of nothing, and buy the grass from them at teh same market value that corn goes for. this would prevent corn farmers from becoming sawgrass farmers for higher profits, we continue to grow enough food crops, and we have a significantly higher ethanol yield

 

I've read that with the increases in the prices for grain (corn, wheat, soy), more farmers are farming those empty fields; or renting them to other farmers that can afford to plant them. As a result, there are much FEWER dormant fields. Also, I see the gov't removing those subsidies to not farm land; especially with the price/demand for grains for both fuel and food. Good time to be farming in my opinion. :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • sorry to bump an old thread, im a bit clueless with this stuff, would these fit a 2019+ Silverado? https://wiperpro.com.au/products/chevrolet-silverado-wiper-blades mainly wondering if the beam shape stays planted at highway speed, thats what seems to let the factory ones down imo
    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...