Jump to content

New To The Club, New To The Forum Thing


GreySkull

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all.

 

This would be a first for me.

 

I'm never really been in to the forum thing, but a friend of mine told me to look in to them for helpful info. Who better to ask then to people who drive them and work on them every day. I'm currently the proud owner of a brand new 08 1500 Silverado ext cab 2wd, with a few upgrades and Greystone for my color choice. When I found out GM called it Greystone, I couldn't help but to name the truck Greyskull. Ah childhood memory, what can I say. This would be my second Chevy in recent years, I lost a beautiful 03 Avalanche to a previous life.

 

Anyways, hello to everyone, I look forward to utilizing the knowledge found here to build and improve the truck. One day I hope to make it my one of a kind truck.

 

I would like to know if there is anyone here who's truck bounces a lot. I never really had much of an issue with my other trucks, but this new one has more bounce to it. I do expect a rough ride from a truck, but that is not the case here. It feels more like a washboard affect, even on smoother roads and highways. My Avalanche road like a dream, had no complaints there and I just got ride of a sprots car for the truck. So I'm used to "feeling the road." Just doesn't feel right.

 

Your thoughts???

Posted

Welcome. Does the bouncy feeling happen on all roads and all surfaces or does it tend to happen more on one than the other?

Posted

Welcome to the site, and lets see some pictures of the truck. If it wasn't brand new, I'd say something about shocks, but I find it hard to believe shocks on a brand new truck would be bad.

 

What size wheels and tires are on the truck? If you have the 20s, they may be giving you a ride different than what you're used to... :D

 

EDIT: Another thing you could do, is go back to the dealer, tell them what's up, and see if they'll let you test drive a similar truck to compare the ride.

Posted

Hi there and welcome to GM Trucks! :D Congrats on the new truck. Does the bouncing feel like it's coming from the front, back, or both? It may be that the wheels need a balancing. There will be a bit more 'bounce' as there is less weight over the rear wheels than with an Avalanche. I would mention it to the dealer and get them to take a look at it.

 

Dan: You're looking real happy to be sitting on that engine there.

Posted

Welcome aboard! Does this "bouncing" feeling happen with or without the girlfriend/wife along for the "ride"? :D:lol:

Posted

Yep the truck is new, had 7 miles on it when I drove it off the lot. I would like to say the bouncing is worse when the wife in the truck, but we haven't got the chance to break it in right yet ;) The tires and wheels are 275/50/20.

 

Anyways, I would like to take it back to the dealer, however (and you my have heard of this) the dealer I bought it from went belly up 2 weeks after I bought it. Bill Heard Chevy, ya they closed all 13 dealerships nation wide. I like there service department, they have helped me in the past and was the main reason I went there to buy. Now I know your going to say " take it to another dealer," and I will when I find one I trust. The next closest one told me it was normal for the truck to bounce. So this weekend I'm not on call and not going out of town, I'll call up some other shops and see what they say.

 

P.S. I don't have pics yet, but this is damn close to it.

post-55653-1225162869_thumb.jpg

post-55653-1225162869_thumb.jpg

post-55653-1225162869_thumb.jpg

post-55653-1225162869_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...