Jump to content

Dan's Whore It Up Picture Thread...


Zembonez

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well you gotta wait a couple days, I don't have the camera just yet...

 

And I've posted every picture I've taken in the last year. :jester:

Trust me Dan. It'll still be here!

Posted
Well you gotta wait a couple days, I don't have the camera just yet...

 

And I've posted every picture I've taken in the last year. :jester:

Trust me Dan. It'll still be here!

 

 

Really? Ya sure?

 

You wouldn't be foolin' me now, wouldja? :lol:

Posted
Well you gotta wait a couple days, I don't have the camera just yet...

 

And I've posted every picture I've taken in the last year. :jester:

Trust me Dan. It'll still be here!

 

 

Really? Ya sure?

 

You wouldn't be foolin' me now, wouldja? :lol:

 

I'm getting a 70-210 lens for my Nikon. Good mid level focal length lens. I'll help you fill this space. :lol:

Posted
Well you gotta wait a couple days, I don't have the camera just yet...

 

And I've posted every picture I've taken in the last year. :jester:

Trust me Dan. It'll still be here!

 

 

Really? Ya sure?

 

You wouldn't be foolin' me now, wouldja? :lol:

 

I'm getting a 70-210 lens for my Nikon. Good mid level focal length lens. I'll help you fill this space. :lol:

 

 

 

 

Cool. I'm still a SLR/DSLR newbie, so I barely know what that means, but I've got a photography book I've been reading. Just starting to understand how shutter speed/aperture are related, and damn am I getting excited. I've always liked taking pictures (obviously :lol:), but now I'll be able to compose pictures. :lol:

Posted
Cool. I'm still a SLR/DSLR newbie, so I barely know what that means, but I've got a photography book I've been reading. Just starting to understand how shutter speed/aperture are related, and damn am I getting excited. I've always liked taking pictures (obviously :jester:), but now I'll be able to compose pictures. :lol:

It really is fun. I have an 18-135mm lens on my D80 now but the new lens will give me more options... especially doing stuff like action shots.

 

IHRA48.jpg

Posted

You first pics should be of what you get, too. :jester:

 

The AE-1's and lenses I bought before I realized the PITA setting up a color dark room was going to be :

PIC00014.jpg

 

My Canon Film Rebel that I still take on trips, as a backup "just in case" the dReb dies :

PIC00015.jpg

(why there's an AE-1 manual in that picture, I'm not quite sure... I think the AE-1 stuff was in the close cased)

 

The AE-1P I used most. That zoom lens turned out to be a piece........

PIC00016.jpg

Posted
Cool. I'm still a SLR/DSLR newbie, so I barely know what that means, but I've got a photography book I've been reading. Just starting to understand how shutter speed/aperture are related, and damn am I getting excited. I've always liked taking pictures (obviously :jester: ), but now I'll be able to compose pictures. :lol:

It really is fun. I have an 18-135mm lens on my D80 now but the new lens will give me more options... especially doing stuff like action shots.

 

IHRA48.jpg

 

 

 

Nice, action shots are always cool.

 

Ok, newbie question here: I understand how aperture and shutter speed work in regards to action shots, but how does the longer focal length relate?

 

And damn, Michael, got a few cameras there? :lol:

Posted
Ok, newbie question here: I understand how aperture and shutter speed work in regards to action shots, but how does the longer focal length relate?

 

And damn, Michael, got a few cameras there? :jester:

Well... lets say you have a person standing across the street from you. With 50mm lense you are going to get a lot of stuff around them and a small distant pic of the person. With a 210mm lense you can see if they have any wrinkles around their eyes and they fill much of the frame. It just allows you to get closer to the action... Downside it that it takes more light to create a good image and a steady hand or tripod to get good sharp images.

 

What lens did you get with the Canon?

Posted
And damn, Michael, got a few cameras there? :jester:

Yeah, that was when I first discovered eBay.. I went a little overboard. :lol:

 

When I first started looking at digital, it just seemed SO expensive to get into it. So, I was going to buy some older film-based cameras (which I was already familiar with), setup a dark room, and go that route... That is until I realized the trouble & expense of setting up a color dark room.. and the expense of getting "allllllll that film developed." A few $50-60 trips to the film developing place (plus film) and digital didn't look quite so expensive, then...! :lol:

Posted
And damn, Michael, got a few cameras there? :jester:

Yeah, that was when I first discovered eBay.. I went a little overboard. :lol:

 

When I first started looking at digital, it just seemed SO expensive to get into it. So, I was going to buy some older film-based cameras (which I was already familiar with), setup a dark room, and go that route... That is until I realized the trouble & expense of setting up a color dark room.. and the expense of getting "allllllll that film developed." A few $50-60 trips to the film developing place (plus film) and digital didn't look quite so expensive, then...! :lol:

 

I still have my Nikon 35mm stuff. Don't think I'll be getting rid of any of it. Film still has its place. Very artsy medium. Less sterile than digital. Has warmth that digital can't produce... sort of the same reason I have an extensive vinyl collection and a nice turntable.

Posted
What lens did you get with the Canon?

With the Digital Rebel? It came with the 18-55 EF-S "kit" (consumer) lens. I still need to upgrade that. Since I take so much landscape-style photography, I really should've upgraded the "short" lens before I got the nice (to me) "long" lens. But, I had taken a couple of road trips and felt like I had "missed" some far off shots of things, because the 75-300mm zoom couldn't reach quiiiite far enough (and it the images always looked 'off').

 

So, I upgraded.

IMG_9463sm.jpg

 

The old lens is the black one... The new one is a beast. But if you can give it enough light, it shoots some damn good pictures. All of the Space Shuttle pics were shot with the big'un, hand-held... most of them, I had it fully extended.

Posted
I still have my Nikon 35mm stuff. Don't think I'll be getting rid of any of it. Film still has its place. Very artsy medium. Less sterile than digital. Has warmth that digital can't produce... sort of the same reason I have an extensive vinyl collection and a nice turntable.

Oh, I agree! Some of my favorite pictures were taken with the film Rebel on a quick weekend trip to Colorado. I really need to make a point of pulling it out more often and taking at least a few pictures with it.

 

I haven't sold any of my film stuff (even that zoom lens that turned out to be a piece)... I've managed to hang on to every one of these cameras.. and I have no intentions of selling them (unless someone offers me way more than would be reasonable to turn down! :jester:).

Posted
Well... lets say you have a person standing across the street from you. With 50mm lense you are going to get a lot of stuff around them and a small distant pic of the person. With a 210mm lense you can see if they have any wrinkles around their eyes and they fill much of the frame. It just allows you to get closer to the action... Downside it that it takes more light to create a good image and a steady hand or tripod to get good sharp images.

 

What lens did you get with the Canon?

 

Ok so it's mainly just a zoom thing (I always over-think stuff :lol:)

 

And like Michael said the kit lens for the Canon is an 18-55mm. Should do me just fine for a while. :jester:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
    • Engine Wear and ISO 4406   1.) Cold Starts. 2.) High Particle Count. 3.) Low operating temperature viscosity and high low temperature cranking viscosity. 4.) Depleted AW, Friction and Acid packages.  5.) High engine load.    https://me.caltexlubricants.com/en_me/home/learning/from-chevron/heavy-duty-diesel-vehicles-and-equipment/The-Importance-of-Clean-Engine-Oil-and-Its-Impact-on-Equipment-and-Business-Performance.html   High particle counts have five sources. 1.) They are manufactured within the engine. Both wear debris and amalgamation of degradation products and combustion driven soot (worse in GDI). 2.) They are ingested via intake air. Ever hear the best oil filter is a good air filter? 3.) They are entrained in the fuel. 4.) This one is insidious. They are introduced in 'fresh oil'. 5.) They are introduced during the oil change.   ISO 4406 is the test that measures and quantifies the combine effects of all of the above particle related issues. You can mitigate your way into multiples of engine life by being attentive to them all.    https://www.hyprofiltration.com/blog/is-new-oil-clean   (from the link above)    [Quote] What Is the Recommended ISO 4406 Cleanliness Code for New Oil?   A good upper limit for new oil cleanliness is 16/14/11 (ISO 4406). Typical new oil usually has ISO codes of 19/17/15 or worse, which is far too dirty for sensitive components. This can be a major cause of degradation and premature failure. [Close quote].     Source of graph: Machinery Lubrication (GM Study)  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...