Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Fixed

 

 

Hey. I also have a 2007 GMC Sierra 1500. I am having all of the same problems except mine will go into "Reduced Power Mode" after the Service Stabilitrak & Service Traction Control warning comes on. I seen that you had a vacuum leak. Where was the leak at? Maybe it will fix my problem as well!

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Ok well after all of this I think I found the probelm to be a vacuum leak. What is supposed to attach to the black thing coming off the intake on the passenger side? Is it just supposed to have a cover on it?

 

Thanks

 

 

 

Where is this picture... I am having the same problem with my truck and need some help please :thumbs:

  • 2 years later...
Posted

I was having this exact same issue with my 2007 Silverado. Service stabilitrak light would come and go, mainly at low RPMs and go away when the RPM's rose.

 

I found out that the problem was an exhaust leak at the flange between the manifold and catalytic converters. This was causing the lean code and triggering the service stabilitrak. I patched that up and it has been running great since.

 

The important thing here is to know which bank is being triggered. If it is both then it is probably up by the intake. If it is one or the other it is either a sensor or an exhaust leak. This, of course, is just from my experience.

 

Hopefully this helps someone with the same problem!

  • 3 years later...
Posted

2007 Suburban 5.3 Flex, cel on, service stabilitak, hard shifts resolved!

 For my application, I had a lean bank1 & 2 code (P0171,P0174) and hard shifts, intermittant.... only when stabilitak warning occured.

It was an intake leak.... the hose connected to the drivers valve cover cracked.

 Apparently anytime the stabiltrak warning occurs (many, many possible errors), the default is maximum line pressure and hard shifts.

FYI, I deleted the AFM feature, both in the ECU and mechanical. Replaced cam, non-afm lifters for all cylinders, and non-afm valley cover. No noticable differnce in mpg.

 

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 2/20/2009 at 2:22 PM, bow07 said:

Fixed

I’m having the same issues w my 07 Sierra 5.3 what was the problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • if you want a short turning radius get a short bed Colorado!
    • that is pretty awesome MPG there!  I think so far one observation is these trucks do way better on MPG under 65mph vs 70+ and they really suffer at 75+   I noticed on the stretches into NE on 76 and 80 which is posted 75MPH and I was doing 82 I was getting more like 13.    
    • No ETA is available for that engine at the moment in the GM system.   I would start at the dealer.  Try and talk to the parts manager or service manager and see if they can start a CX Connect case and get an ETA from GM on when engines may be available.  If they just check Parts Workbench and say "no eta", they aren't trying hard enough.  They need to do a CX Connect and chat with DPAC to find the ETA.      
    • I would have to read back to get a better picture in my mind of some of the other comments and what they were using for a driving scenario they based the fuel mileage off of. That is why the fuel mileage conversation is extremely difficult to make fair comparisons from. If I was to be living in town and only driving around town, light to light and some longer stretches that doesn't have a light every block, and the usual stop at a grocery store and the bank and so on and so forth, my fuel mileage even during the summer time would be so bad with my truck I don't even want to know how bad it would be !. Then add in winter time and idling to warm it up to clear the windows and driving through snowy streets etc, large heavy trucks with gas engines have NEVER been worth crap for fuel mileage and why some little pot licker of a car with wheelbarrow tires and a 1300 cc four cylinder non turbo engine was the ticket to using a mere fraction of the fuel over a full size pickup.    By the way my truck has the 34" tires as its a HC but not the BFG KO3 tires ( that was an option for my truck but the sales guy couldn't figure out what the tires actually were so that never got on the order until it was too late to change the truck order ). So what fuel mileage your getting actually sounds good for "town driving" and with my truck when I go to town the fuel mileage keeps increasing as I get closer to town because it takes quite a while to get the driveline oils warmed up ( and why it always shows better fuel mileage on the return trip from town because its already warmed up ) but once I am in town that fuel mileage average just keeps dropping the more I mess around town and then has to recover back to something reasonable again by the time I get home for an over all average.    I'd be curious what your sticker says for the factory weight of your truck, mine is close around that 7700 lb due to the options it has. But anyway the long and short is, vehicle weight, higher rolling resistance heavy tires and a hefty driveline and a relatively large gas engine make for crap fuel mileage in stop and go scenarios, all one can do is drive it easy off the line at each stop and as my dad had said over the years, drive like a raw egg is under your foot and that's the best one can do. Years back with a carbed engine and if the carb was getting a bit out of tune etc as would the ignition system, the fuel mileage on pickups with larger engines was just awful compared to what your getting. We pay the fuel price penalty for driving HD trucks over some little vehicle, that is the reality. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...