Jump to content

5.3 Or 6.0?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey All - It's been a few years since I posted, I went Honda Ridgeline for awhile....I know I know.

 

Anyway, looks like now is the time to get back into a new Chevy. I'm looking a 1500 crew cab LT but can't decide between the 5.3/4 speed or the 6.0/6 speed. What seems to be the general consensus on which is the better combo? Any known issues with either one?

 

Also, what ever happened to Wester's? all I'm seeing now is Black Bear....

 

Thanks

Posted

Moo,

They are completely different animals. If you just want a truck for it's utilitarian purposes, decent milage, etc., a 5.3 may be the way to go. If you want a bit of a hotrod, the 6.0 or even hotter 6.2 2009 would be the way to go.

Posted
Hey All - It's been a few years since I posted, I went Honda Ridgeline for awhile....I know I know.

 

Anyway, looks like now is the time to get back into a new Chevy. I'm looking a 1500 crew cab LT but can't decide between the 5.3/4 speed or the 6.0/6 speed. What seems to be the general consensus on which is the better combo? Any known issues with either one?

 

Also, what ever happened to Wester's? all I'm seeing now is Black Bear....

 

Thanks

If you want to match the Ridgeline's performance, I'd get the 4.3 V6 and fill the bed with sand. That should get you close. My next door neighbor bought one and tried to pull a boat with it. I thought we were going to get killed.

 

OK... enough of that. Both are very good. The 5.3 / 4 speed combo is a proven setup. Very reliable. It should do everything the average buyer needs unless heavy towing is in their plans. NEEDS is the key word here. the 6.0 / 6 speed would be more fun to drive.

Posted
If you want to match the Ridgeline's performance, I'd get the 4.3 V6 and fill the bed with sand. That should get you close. My next door neighbor bought one and tried to pull a boat with it. I thought we were going to get killed.

 

OK... enough of that. Both are very good. The 5.3 / 4 speed combo is a proven setup. Very reliable. It should do everything the average buyer needs unless heavy towing is in their plans. NEEDS is the key word here. the 6.0 / 6 speed would be more fun to drive.

 

+1, And I see your back.

Posted

what are you going to be pulling with it? unless you're frequently hauling 5000+ lbs, i wouldn't bother with the 6.0/6.2....not worth the extra money and increased fuel consumption.

 

i want the 6.2 6sp real bad, but i don't need it.

Posted

Nothing wrong with Westers besides the price.

 

Blackbear sends you the datalogger so you can provide him a real time log of how your truck is running. He (justin) has a better feel of what you have and can tune accordingly.

Posted

I agree with 'bonez.

 

If you needed the 6.0L you wouldn't be asking. Coming from a Pantyline, you probably don't do a lot of towing. :P

 

But if you're looking for some devil's advocates, I'll play. I think the 6.0/6.2 and 6spd would be a hell of a rig. If you're ok with the extra upfront and fuel $$, then go for it! :D

Posted
If you want to match the Ridgeline's performance, I'd get the 4.3 V6 and fill the bed with sand. That should get you close.

 

 

LOL... That's true actually...

Posted
what are you going to be pulling with it? unless you're frequently hauling 5000+ lbs, i wouldn't bother with the 6.0/6.2....not worth the extra money and increased fuel consumption.

 

..... just my mother-in-law... :D

 

 

 

I ordered my last 05' 2500HD from the factory with the 8.1/ZF 6spd & the rig did an admirable job of hauling my Northstar slide-in. this time around, I'll be pulling a large pop-up & motorcycle and will have the cab stuffed with 5 people and all the associated gear. FWIW - I live at 7K feet elev.

 

What is 'real world' fuel mileage for the two motors in the conditions mentioned above?

Posted
what are you going to be pulling with it? unless you're frequently hauling 5000+ lbs, i wouldn't bother with the 6.0/6.2....not worth the extra money and increased fuel consumption.

 

..... just my mother-in-law... :P

 

 

 

I ordered my last 05' 2500HD from the factory with the 8.1/ZF 6spd & the rig did an admirable job of hauling my Northstar slide-in. this time around, I'll be pulling a large pop-up & motorcycle and will have the cab stuffed with 5 people and all the associated gear. FWIW - I live at 7K feet elev.

 

What is 'real world' fuel mileage for the two motors in the conditions mentioned above?

 

 

 

Maybe get the Tow Package as an option then? :D

 

 

I joke, I joke.

 

 

 

The 5.3 with the 4 speed is great for a lot of things. It depends how much cash you want to throw at your truck for the fun stuff.

Posted
Bonez

 

Off-topic but is the USGuntalk board linked in your post, new? I've been on Glocktalk and others for years but have never seen that one - looks good.

It's new. My son (texas1911) and I started it about three weeks ago. It's growing quickly and we'd love to have you come and join up! Lots of guys from GMT are there too.

Posted

One more chime...

 

5.3 = average

 

6.0 = above average

 

If you plan on spending your money on power mods (CAI,exhaust,tune), just spend the money up front and get the 6.0

Posted

If you're looking new, the 5.3L gets the 6-speed for 2009 in the Crew Cab version of the P/U.

 

My recent drive of a 5.3L/6-speed/3.42 gear suburban suggests it performs much better than the family's 2007 5.3L/3.73/4-speed suburban, and at least in pickups, it's rated to tow more than the 4-speed truck, too.

 

Likely the 6-speed will do better than the 4-speed for highway fuel econ (for the same motor) as the 6-speed has the 3.42 rather than the 3.73, but much more trans gear ratio, hence the performance difference.

 

6-speed has some cool features I've been looking forward to, as well. Now to find some money for the downstroke on the 2009 before the lease on the 2007 ends!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 832 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...