Jump to content

Do You Regret Getting The 6.2l? The 5.3l?


Engine Regrets?  

92 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious. Do you regret ordering the big 6.2L for any reason (fuel economy, etc)???

 

What about 5.3L owners? Do you wish you upped to the 6.2, or is the 5.3 doing well for you?

Posted

Out of the chevy trucks I have drove or owned I feel the 5.3 is great for me. I could be happier without the TM. I have driven the 4.3 and its just not enough for me, my grandpa has a 99 with the 5.7 and it feels a lot weaker than mine, buddy has a 8.1 and thats just overkill he cant even manage to keep 10mpg most of the time. Next truck will have the 6.2 probably just because I cant find a good reason not to have it, although I would like to see how a 5.3 feels with a 6 speed.

Posted

I'm probably one of the few thats had both in the same configuration(CrewCab SB)......... 5.3 6sp,good power and works great together,sips fuel!!!!!! 6.2 6sp,huge fun factor,better for towing about 1.5 to 2.0 mpg less city or highway.......

Posted

had a 4.3 in my 93 cheyenne, and a 4.3 in my blazer, and drove my dad's 5.0 305 sierra which was incredibly underpowered. used to drive my buddy's 94 z71 5.7l 350 all the time and enjoyed the power and have always wanted a v8. also drove my grandpa's '99 5.3 sierra and really enjoyed it..

 

my life is filled with gm trucks and i wouldn't want it any other way. i would never utilize the 6.2l and couldn't find a 4.8l that i liked for sale, so i got the 5.3l and have been very happy with it. a tune would make me even more happy, but it does what i need it to do.

Posted

I got the 5.3L because I wanted Flex-Fuel. Then I found out later that they were making a 6.2L Flex Fuel. :dunno:

 

If buying today, I'd consider the 6.2L just because I like power. But my 5.3L has been a fine engine and goes pretty good, post Blackbear :dunno:

Posted

If I had to do it over again I would still get the 5.3. My truck pulls my boat car trailer fine and gets decent mileage. Perhaps if I had a travel trailer I would opt for the 6.2 or 3/4 ton.

Posted

I am happy with the 5.3 99% of the time. There is still that 1% that just wants to drop the hammer and listen to the 6.2 rip through the gears :dunno:

 

The 5.3 gets me good gas mileage while still being able to tow the boat.

 

-Svence

Posted

I bought used, so I didn't really have much of a choice.

 

The 5.3 so far does a very good job, but there are times I wish it had more power.

 

Part of this comes from the fact that I went from a Dodge 3500 dually 12v CTD 5 spd with 300 HP & 800 ft lbs (not totally stock) to the 5.3.

 

Fuel mileage is about the same, but the fun factor of all that torque is not even close........

 

I also no longer had a true need for such a huge truck anymore.

Posted

I hate the 6.2 wish I had gotten a 3.5L so I didnt pass so many cars on the road. The 6.2 is to much fun to drive and I cannot handle all of this fun.

Posted

In 99 in a half ton that's the biggest thing they shoved in them. That is always my one question on a new vehicle. "Is that the biggest engine they have available?" Remember folks "Their is NO replacement for displacement!"

 

Words to live by.

 

Jbo

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...