Jump to content

Does Your 6.2l Vibrate At Idle?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Does your vortec 6.2L vibrate slightly (enough to feel it through the seat and steering wheel) when at a stop or in park? Mine does but on other forums, dealers have been telling customers its normal. Should I even bother to bring mine in? The throttle body is clean, i made sure of that. 

Posted
Does your vortec 6.2L vibrate slightly (enough to feel it through the seat and steering wheel) when at a stop or in park? Mine does but on other forums, dealers have been telling customers its normal. Should I even bother to bring mine in? The throttle body is clean, i made sure of that. 

A V8 engine is not a naturally balanced engine configuration. At certain RPMs there are vibrations that can be felt. These are normal and part of the design. Differing engine mounts make the problem noticeable on some vehicles and less so on others. If you actually have a miss at idle, that is a different subject altogether...

Posted
Does your vortec 6.2L vibrate slightly (enough to feel it through the seat and steering wheel) when at a stop or in park? Mine does but on other forums, dealers have been telling customers its normal. Should I even bother to bring mine in? The throttle body is clean, i made sure of that. 

 

Only way to balance a stock engine is to turn it off. Slight vibrations are possible at low and high rpms...

 

Jbo

Posted
Does your vortec 6.2L vibrate slightly (enough to feel it through the seat and steering wheel) when at a stop or in park? Mine does but on other forums, dealers have been telling customers its normal. Should I even bother to bring mine in? The throttle body is clean, i made sure of that. 

 

Mine is 5.3L, but it had the vibration at idle since new, dealer say it's normal and it is related to fuel!. ..it almost disappeared now.

Posted

My 2010 Yukon 3/4 ton 4x4 6.0 liter has the same shudder / vibration while it's in park or in gear at a stop. It's not bad, but you can feel it.

Posted

Good to hear that its normal from other owners as well. Definitely not my first or biggest V8 but the L92 seems to be the one that vibrates the most.

Posted

Gentlemen,

 

A v8 has perfect primary and secondary balance by design. Google "v8 balance". Your truck should idle silky smooth. My 5.3 and every other 8 I have ever owned idled smoothly.

 

Ken

Posted

i have a mild vibration at idle :tear: its not constant just a little here and there...its a truck,its a v8, it runs great...i'm happy with it

Posted
You might also be experiencing the "cat test" which makes the vehicle go lean.

 

I understand this done only when the engine is started, open loop then close loop. I may be wrong.

Posted

Just tell yourself you have a nice, mild cam in there... just waiting for you to unleash the power:)

 

My 99 5.3 didn't do this, but my 08 5.3 has a slight, random "rumble" at idle that I noticed when new. I've complete forgotten about it since. Honestly, I think it probably does have a different cam profile, as this truck puts out considerably more power than the 99 did (the stock exhaust has a more free-flowing sound to it too). The 2010 5.3 has VVT (as does the 6.2), so I would think they could tune some of that out?

Posted

Cam profile--the 6.2L powerhouse especially--differences in gas, temperature/humidity, etc. all contribute. This is natural to the 6.2L most, however, by nature. Should be minor, but happens, especially with changes in the conditions.

 

Very variable. Not abnormal.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...