Jump to content

Ford Flex


tanked_darren

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I went to Mexico for 9 days and needless to say someone had there way with my door lock, they didn't get anything even though there were items a cracker could sell inside, the door needed fixing so I took it to a bodyshop and they gave me a Ford Flex for the day.

 

I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is. Optioned well, ergonomics were very good inside the vehicle, power was pretty good. But hey anything is better than a corrolla I guess (which is what they where going to give me at first) I almost want to say I wish I could keep it, but it's still not a truck.

I thought these things were ugly as a Honda Pilot when they came out, but I take it back, I don't know why but I just plain ol' like it! Too bad they are so expensive.

 

Anyways.... let the flaming begin. :cool:

Posted

if i ever owned a ford flex i would have arnold in his body builder years air brushed on the hood with big words saying, THIS IS A FLEX

Posted
if i ever owned a ford flex i would have arnold in his body builder years air brushed on the hood with big words saying, THIS IS A FLEX

 

hahahahahahahahahahaha

Posted
if i ever owned a ford flex i would have arnold in his body builder years air brushed on the hood with big words saying, THIS IS A FLEX

 

 

:lol::cool::mad:

Posted
if i ever owned a ford flex i would have arnold in his body builder years air brushed on the hood with big words saying, THIS IS A FLEX

 

 

why not have Flex Wheeler air-burshed on it..

 

I could even have him pose for you, he's a customer of ours..

Posted
Anyways.... let the flaming begin. :mad:

 

I have faith that P71_CrownVic will be along shortly to show you the light. :cool:

 

 

i was thinking the exact same thing lol, i actually don't mind the flex too

Posted
I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is.

 

A rental...or complete failure, you can choose.

 

That Tahoe is a FAR better vehicle all around. Better cargo capacity, better towing, just as efficient, proper RWD, proper V8, proper off-road capability, etc, etc, etc.

Posted
I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is.

 

A rental...or complete failure, you can choose.

 

That Tahoe is a FAR better vehicle all around. Better cargo capacity, better towing, just as efficient, proper RWD, proper V8, proper off-road capability, etc, etc, etc.

 

 

I don't think folks buy a Flex, with intentions of going off roading!!

 

I think its a neat ride. Ford has some great vehicles out. And, although it might not be a GM, at least its not a nissian or toyoda!

Posted
I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is.

 

A rental...or complete failure, you can choose.

 

That Tahoe is a FAR better vehicle all around. Better cargo capacity, better towing, just as efficient, proper RWD, proper V8, proper off-road capability, etc, etc, etc.

 

 

question? you are the biggest ford hater i know, but yet your nickname is P71_CrownVic. last time i checked isn't a Crown Vic a ford?

Posted
I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is.

 

A rental...or complete failure, you can choose.

 

That Tahoe is a FAR better vehicle all around. Better cargo capacity, better towing, just as efficient, proper RWD, proper V8, proper off-road capability, etc, etc, etc.

 

 

question? you are the biggest ford hater i know, but yet your nickname is P71_CrownVic. last time i checked isn't a Crown Vic a ford?

 

 

1. I'm not a "hater"...I just dislike the current mediocre offerings we get from Ford here in the U.S.

 

2. When I was looking for information about the GMT-800 I was looking to buy, my current car was a 2001 Ford Crown Vic.

Posted
I was impressed, it was a nice ride for what it is.

 

A rental...or complete failure, you can choose.

 

That Tahoe is a FAR better vehicle all around. Better cargo capacity, better towing, just as efficient, proper RWD, proper V8, proper off-road capability, etc, etc, etc.

 

 

I don't think folks buy a Flex, with intentions of going off roading!!

 

They may not...but with the Tahoe....you have that option...with no penalty. The Flex can hardly handle a gravel road.

 

at least its not a Nissan or Toyota!

 

Any of Ford's current crop of appliances they sell here could very well be a Toyota. They are equally bland/boring inside and out.

Posted

A Tahoe is not a Flex.

 

I just wanted to say I got to drive one, and I liked it. It was a cool change from a pick-up and I was impressed.

 

Nice to see there are a few others here who share an open mind.

 

Pfff Tahoe.... :(

 

 

EDIT: Obviously the flex is a city vehicle. I would and did drive it as one. The GMC is for the dirt and gravel and its a 2wd!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 304 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...