Jump to content

Factory Gps Hard To Use?


flyin6

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm on my 5th factory GPS, ( 2 denalis, a H2, a Saab, and my Escalade) and none of them are easy to use. They just don't seem intuitive, and are actually dangerous in my opinion. The older ones didn't have a great database. Now they do, but force you to make address entries in a difficult manner.

I much perfer our Garmin

I knew I wasn't alone when I saw my wife was using the GPS screen as the suction cup mount point for her Garmin!

Anyone else out there think the GM GPS is, clumsy?

Posted

Oh yeah....I much perfer my garmin to the GM Nav.

I purchased my truck used, and it came with it. If I had to pay for the option, no way. Cost aside, I still perfer my garmin.

I find the database is not as good, that is my garmin will often find addresses that the GM Nav does not.

Also, I haven't found a way to enter GPS co-ordinates. I do a fair number of scout camps, with don't really have street addresses, but GPS co-ordinates. The GM Nav is useless for those.

 

Don't get me wrong, I do like the GM Nav, it's nice to have as it's all intergrated into the sound system etc. It's just I agree with flyin6, garmin is much easier to use.

Posted

Only thing I don't like about it is the point of interest makes you enter a name of the place. Where most let you enter a type of place.

 

What I mean is with the gm if I want to find a coffee shop or supermarket I have to put in the name of one like starbucks or vons. But with the one in my last car all I had to put in was coffee shop or grocery store and it gave me a list.

 

Other than that I like it.

Posted

Ok, I have to ask....how to you input the name of a POI you're looking for ?

Posted
Ok, I have to ask....how to you input the name of a POI you're looking for ?

 

 

under the destination button there is an option to choose PLACE in lue of ADDRESS, but it requires you to name the place.

Posted
Oh yeah....I much perfer my garmin to the GM Nav.

I purchased my truck used, and it came with it. If I had to pay for the option, no way. Cost aside, I still perfer my garmin.

I find the database is not as good, that is my garmin will often find addresses that the GM Nav does not.

Also, I haven't found a way to enter GPS co-ordinates. I do a fair number of scout camps, with don't really have street addresses, but GPS co-ordinates. The GM Nav is useless for those.

 

Don't get me wrong, I do like the GM Nav, it's nice to have as it's all intergrated into the sound system etc. It's just I agree with flyin6, garmin is much easier to use.

 

Concurr...

 

Everytime I purchase I set out to order the vehicle. That way (with the exception of the Caddy) I could delete the GPS. Then someone offers me a "deal" like zero percent (twice) and I take a lot unit which has the GPS. I am always hoping someone will come up with a way to use the hardware while dumping the software so I can use lat/long and stuff like that...

Posted

I bought an aftermarket NAV unit for that reason. It's cheaper then the factory order cost. It uses the garmin interface. So much better to use. The only downside is it does not look OEM.

Posted
Oh yeah....I much perfer my garmin to the GM Nav.

I purchased my truck used, and it came with it. If I had to pay for the option, no way. Cost aside, I still perfer my garmin.

I find the database is not as good, that is my garmin will often find addresses that the GM Nav does not.

Also, I haven't found a way to enter GPS co-ordinates. I do a fair number of scout camps, with don't really have street addresses, but GPS co-ordinates. The GM Nav is useless for those.

 

Don't get me wrong, I do like the GM Nav, it's nice to have as it's all intergrated into the sound system etc. It's just I agree with flyin6, garmin is much easier to use.

 

Concurr...

 

Everytime I purchase I set out to order the vehicle. That way (with the exception of the Caddy) I could delete the GPS. Then someone offers me a "deal" like zero percent (twice) and I take a lot unit which has the GPS. I am always hoping someone will come up with a way to use the hardware while dumping the software so I can use lat/long and stuff like that...

 

 

 

you can access the long/lat on the factory unit:

 

http://www.tahoeforum.com/showthread.php?t=9520

Posted
Oh yeah....I much perfer my garmin to the GM Nav.

I purchased my truck used, and it came with it. If I had to pay for the option, no way. Cost aside, I still perfer my garmin.

I find the database is not as good, that is my garmin will often find addresses that the GM Nav does not.

Also, I haven't found a way to enter GPS co-ordinates. I do a fair number of scout camps, with don't really have street addresses, but GPS co-ordinates. The GM Nav is useless for those.

 

Don't get me wrong, I do like the GM Nav, it's nice to have as it's all intergrated into the sound system etc. It's just I agree with flyin6, garmin is much easier to use.

 

Concurr...

 

Everytime I purchase I set out to order the vehicle. That way (with the exception of the Caddy) I could delete the GPS. Then someone offers me a "deal" like zero percent (twice) and I take a lot unit which has the GPS. I am always hoping someone will come up with a way to use the hardware while dumping the software so I can use lat/long and stuff like that...

 

 

 

you can access the long/lat on the factory unit:

 

http://www.tahoeforum.com/showthread.php?t=9520

 

 

 

Thanks for the link!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 350 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...