Jump to content

Rc 3.5 In Video


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
hey did you see the rough country 3.5 in lift video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gtvd-LiNTCU

Thanks 97reddodge:

 

I have the 3.5 inch RC lift in the bed of my 2011 Sierra as I type... it's getting it installed tomorrow, along with BFGoodrich 285/70R17.

 

Can't wait!

 

There has not been many pics of this lift installed, and this video had some good shots... thanks again!

Posted

There has not been many pics of it installed because it is shit. I'm serious. If I were you, I send it back and get my money back like a lot of us have. Some people have had it on for less then a month. I strongly advise taking it back. I haven't heard of anyone happy with this lift.

Posted

And the title reads "Rough country 3" lift". I would FOR SURE stay away from that piece of shit. That and the "new re designed 3.5" are basically the same.

Posted

I am quite interested to see if the new one has the same problems, the truck in the video looks great but also looks kind of high that I would have figured with just a 1.5 lift in the rear...

Posted

Nice chrome fender trim. That is such a fitting truck for that lift. I bet they had to get it aligned after they finished filming. :thumbs:

Posted

:dunno:

 

And Its a shame you cant hear all of the bushing creaking and rattling going down the road. :thumbs: Seriously, why do we have to keep warning people about this lift. Your truck wont align, it squeaks like hell, the UCA's rub the coils.

 

Anyways, I guess I will post the normal stuff about this lift to try and save some people some money. Dpaul (or anyone else looking at this), Im urging you to take it back and don't risk it. Here are just a few threads of people who already took it off even after we warned them. If you are looking at it, the I think you should look at a leveling kit and a body lift for half the price and more lift, or buy a quality suspension lift. I and several others wasted a lot of money jacking with this piece of shit and luckily they bought it back from me. Others were not so lucky, that is why I would take it back before you open the box. Anyways, I'm tired of warning people. Here are a couple of threads to read through about this lift (AND BELIEVE ME, THERE ARE A TON MORE OUT THERE!)

 

 

http://www.gmfullsize.com/forum/showthread...hlight=c48moose

 

http://www.gmfullsize.com/forum/showthread...hlight=c48moose

 

http://www.gmfullsize.com/forum/showthread...hlight=c48moose

 

http://www.gmfullsize.com/forum/showthread.php?t=222233

 

 

These are just a few. Blackout07 has tried it as well with the same problems. He has seen posts on other forums (that I don't follow) of people taking it off as well. Listen to us!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

The new RC 3.5 inch body lift is great... there is no "bushing creaking and rattling", and the alignment was and still is perfect. And so far it doesn't "squeak like hell" and the "UCA's [do not] rub the coils".

 

I have put 900 miles on it since the lift.... so far so good!

 

I'll post before and after pics once I figure out how!

 

I'll also report any problems with this new design if anything changes.

 

Very very happy so far!!!

 

I was skeptical since I read so many bad things about the old design... I think they may have got it right.

 

NickS - How many miles until your problems started with the old design?

Posted

yeah i have afew friend with the newer style lift they haven't had trouble either and i really like the look of the 3.5 gives it a great stance!

Posted

Update on the 3.5" RC Lift:

 

Almost 3000 miles on the lift and ABSOLUTELY no problems!!!!

 

I have taken it off-road and twisted the frame through ditches.... drove it from Atlanta to St. Louis and back.

 

One month, 3000 miles... I LOVE THIS LIFT!

 

The best $495.00 I have spent.

 

The added 1/2" was most probably for geometry correction. I know where the 1/2" was added and it will definitely reduce stress on the parts that were having problems with the old design. I feel for the folks who had the problems with the original design. It sounds like RC may have had a design flaw.

 

But so far, this 3.5" lift is working great. :jester:

Posted
Update on the 3.5" RC Lift:

 

Almost 3000 miles on the lift and ABSOLUTELY no problems!!!!

 

I have taken it off-road and twisted the frame through ditches.... drove it from Atlanta to St. Louis and back.

 

One month, 3000 miles... I LOVE THIS LIFT!

 

The best $495.00 I have spent.

 

The added 1/2" was most probably for geometry correction. I know where the 1/2" was added and it will definitely reduce stress on the parts that were having problems with the old design. I feel for the folks who had the problems with the original design. It sounds like RC may have had a design flaw.

 

But so far, this 3.5" lift is working great. :jester:

 

Glad to hear you are having good luck with this kit. you can't beat the price, I would like to see the long term effects on the suspension parts.

Posted
The added 1/2" was most probably for geometry correction. I know where the 1/2" was added and it will definitely reduce stress on the parts that were having problems with the old design. I feel for the folks who had the problems with the original design. It sounds like RC may have had a design flaw.

 

But so far, this 3.5" lift is working great. :jester:

 

Glad you are having good luck with it. I don't follow you with the added .5" helping the geometry though. If anything, it would make it worse.

Posted

All I have to say is............good luck. You have to be one of the only people who is happy with this lift. Hope you don't see any problems. Mine started right off the bat (1000 miles) but I didn't notice them until tire wear was showing. I hope you had a good shop align it, because mine did align "within specs of the lift". The shop told me, it was no where near perfect, but was ok according to the specs of the lift. The place has since stopped installing the 3" and "new" 3.5" lift due to all of the problems, and they are a dealer for RC. I don't know. The only thing I do know, is it still isn't worth $500 when you can do a leveling kit and small body lift for half the price IMO.

 

Good luck with the truck, and let us know if you have any trouble. Did you install it yourself? If not, then you may not know what to look for if something is wrong. One of the guys in the threads I posted above installed the new one himself, and took it off in less than a month because of slack and fitment of some stuff.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...