Jump to content

Supercharger


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, I'm trying to find a good book on supercharging. I've found quite a bit on amazon and threw google. I'm just to indecisive, if any of you know of a really good author or book preaseeeeeeee let me know >_< thanks

Posted

Hopefully your not going to waste time and money on supercharging that 4.3 just swap in a 5.3L vortec.

Posted
Hopefully your not going to waste time and money on supercharging that 4.3 just swap in a 5.3L vortec.

 

the charged 4.3 in a s10 would be a beast in a mud truck because of weight... but it all depends on what you will be doing with it.

Posted

I read an article a while ago (think it was super chevy or high performance chevy.....) but they put a cam and a charger on a 4.3 and it made over 500hp before it started to push the head gaskets. Believe they put like 18#'s to it. The other thing was the more they reved it, the more power it made, never seemed to taper off.

Posted

Yea but still by the time you by a supercharger,cam,custom tune+extras like gaskets,if anything breaks plus the time.Its not worth the headache.They came with 175hp thats factory so you have to account for the drive train loss which usually 20% so it putting around 145hp to the ground a supercharger and cam with a nice tune would be around 250hp to the ground still not more then a 5.3L.Shit i can grab a 5.3L vortec with 78k on it for 500 bucks!youll pay 500 bucks just for the cam and tune.

Posted
Yea but still by the time you by a supercharger,cam,custom tune+extras like gaskets,if anything breaks plus the time.Its not worth the headache.They came with 175hp thats factory so you have to account for the drive train loss which usually 20% so it putting around 145hp to the ground a supercharger and cam with a nice tune would be around 250hp to the ground still not more then a 5.3L.Shit i can grab a 5.3L vortec with 78k on it for 500 bucks!youll pay 500 bucks just for the cam and tune.

 

A supercharger kit will run about 5k, and will not give a 100% increase in power. But, it will give you a large amount of torque in the range you normally drive in. I installed a Mossleman supercharger kit in a 2000 Mercedes ML320. Mosselman claimed a near 150 lbft increase in torque for that engine. Truck weighs approx 6000 pounds. Before the supercharger this SUV was just scary to drive around town. Took your life into your hands when pulling out of a parking lot into traffic. After the install, it was like it had a much larger engine. It was a blast to drive that truck, even with the v6. It got better mileage if you stayed out of the throttle as well.

Posted

How many people have the money to buy a supercharger?the money for the results arent worth it bottom line.Buy yourself a syclone!

Posted

Sell your '97 truck. Add the $6K that a supercharger will cost and buy the '07 truck that you want. You are asking for a big loss of $ and a lot of headaches.

 

If it were a '57 GMC 389......... that would be a different story.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

All our vehicles have blowers, except sadly, the Nali.

 

In all honesty, you have to know what you want out of the blower, before spending money on one. I loved having the get up and go on the Tahoe. Being able to mere with traffic at the same speed, getting up to cruise quicker- those were the things I wanted.

 

But I say, if you are going to do it, do it right- know what supporting mods you will also incorporate, and the end state.

Posted
All our vehicles have blowers, except sadly, the Nali.

 

In all honesty, you have to know what you want out of the blower, before spending money on one. I loved having the get up and go on the Tahoe. Being able to mere with traffic at the same speed, getting up to cruise quicker- those were the things I wanted.

 

But I say, if you are going to do it, do it right- know what supporting mods you will also incorporate, and the end state.

 

 

ya i understand,alot of people do that. just buy a blower and thats it...then they complain when parts come flyin thru the hood. LOL.

 

i was gonna do an engine in my truck..but im tradin mine in for an 07 (classic) duramax. my good buddy has industrial injection compound set up for sale(forget the specs but it utilizes factory turbo plus another one) its good to about 650 RWHP. i have the money saved for a Suncoast tranny also once the stock one grenades. im just waiting on a Black 06-07 (i just want the LBZ duramax) with low low low miles and FULLY loaded interior. the truck im drivin now is fully loaded too...that same guy also has his truck for sale. 650 rwhp/+1000 ft/tq 07 NNBS

Posted

I read some time about, the marine 4.3liter intakes(cheap to pick up), injectors, headers and a tune actually liven the 4.3 liter up.. But im still agreed with the 5.3 liter swap.. id keep the motor in the garage and build on it for a while though before throwing it in.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...