Jump to content

Official! Direct injection on gen. V V8s


MikeNH

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.leftlanenews.com/gms-gen-v-small-block-to-get-direct-injection.html

 

 

 

General Motors has confirmed that its next-generation of Gen-V small-block engines will come equipped with fuel-saving direct-injection technology. The engine tech should also be good for a few extra ponies.

 

“The Gen-V small block is an all-new, state-of-the-art engine family that will offer more efficiency and refinement than any other small block in its more than half-century of production,” said Jordan Lee, chief engineer. “For customers, that will mean cars and trucks that deliver more while using less gas to do it.”

GM has yet to release full details on its Gen-V engine family, but it is believed the unit destined for the Chevrolet Corvette will displace 5.5L. Although smaller than the Vette’s current 6.2L Gen-IV V8, the new mill is expected to match or exceed the car’s 430 horsepower rating.

GM has already committed $1 billion to build the next-generation engine family, with that investment expected to create or retain 1,711 jobs. However, the Detroit automaker isn’t committing to a solid launch date, saying only that the “Gen-V small block will go into production in the near future.”

Posted

From what I've seen/heard of them, I think people are going to be impressed with the Gen V GM V8 engines. I wish I knew more so that I could comment more on the CK2XX's as well (because that's where you're going to see the Gen V's the most) but that program is about as tight lipped as it gets. There were nearly more spy shots and info out about the Camaro than this truck and that bit of info in itself, is kinda sad if you think about it for a minute. :crackup:

Posted

LOL I hope the next gen Silverado, Sierra will be excellent and take down ram and f150, but im not sure at this point if it will.

Posted

Based on my experience with the 3.6 in my wife's Traverse, in conjunction with a few things I've read, I'm not so sure SIDI is a good thing. Among other comments, I've read it's harder on motor oil than SFI, and my personal observation so far supports that. Haven't had a UOA done on the 'Verse yet, though.

Posted

Based on my experience with the 3.6 in my wife's Traverse, in conjunction with a few things I've read, I'm not so sure SIDI is a good thing. Among other comments, I've read it's harder on motor oil than SFI, and my personal observation so far supports that. Haven't had a UOA done on the 'Verse yet, though.

 

I'm lost..........So what you're saying is that you can visually tell that the oil has been abused more with SIDI without having a UOA done? Interesting......... :bs:

Posted

Based on my experience with the 3.6 in my wife's Traverse, in conjunction with a few things I've read, I'm not so sure SIDI is a good thing. Among other comments, I've read it's harder on motor oil than SFI, and my personal observation so far supports that. Haven't had a UOA done on the 'Verse yet, though.

 

I'm lost..........So what you're saying is that you can visually tell that the oil has been abused more with SIDI without having a UOA done? Interesting......... :bs:

 

 

Visually, I'm seeing darker oil on the dipstick earlier in the oil/filter change cycle than usual; my one retired brain cell, coupled with past experience, equates that to contamination. But we shall see what the UOA has to say at the one year change interval (~3k miles).

Posted

My brand new '11 6.2 Silverado dirties oil up in less than 500 miles from an oil change. Changed oil at 3,000 and 6,000, used Mobil1 5w30 for the first change, with a Delco filter, and found the UOA results to show not one issue what-so-ever. While I might have been told for years, as well, that black oil is dirty oil, it seems as though UOA results do not completely agree with that and I'll take science over what my grandpa told me, anyday.

Posted

Completely agree as to the importance and significance of the UOA. Have also been using the UPF ACDelco oil filters since my LS1 days; I do think they do a hair better on the filtration side than the standard line, which is already more than adequate, IMO.

Posted

That is the only AC-Delco filter that I have, and will run, on this vehicle. I use Puraltor Gold or Wix instead. The ACD filters have been missing some serious filtering ability for about 6 or so years now.

Posted

I hope they do enough testing before placing these engines in new vehicles. The engines in the Colorado/Canyon had all sorts of issues the first few years. That is what I have read anyway. My 2010 has had zero issues.

 

And I change oil every 3,000 miles and the oil never gets dirty.

Posted

Not to hijack any more than I already have, but any opinions on magnetic oil pan drain plugs on these motors? I've used them since my LS1 days, too.

Posted

I hope they do enough testing before placing these engines in new vehicles. The engines in the Colorado/Canyon had all sorts of issues the first few years. That is what I have read anyway. My 2010 has had zero issues.

 

And I change oil every 3,000 miles and the oil never gets dirty.

 

 

GM has never taken any chances with their modern V8s. They'll never come out and say it openly but the Vette and F-bodies were really just a test bed to make sure the engine design was good before putting them in their #1 product. I've heard rumors before that GDI engines are harder on oil, no idea if it's true but I'll take increased service costs all day long as a minor issue. The excellent throttle response, increased fuel efficiency and HP vs. size are too good to let something minor keep me from it. I haven't driven many GDI engines but the best example so far was a new Sonata- a tiny 2L 4 cyl. 200 HP! VW had to turbo their 2.0s to make that power. And the Hyundai has serious low end for a 4 cyl too- my rental would light up the tires on highway ramps. And when I wasn't messing around on the drive from Detroit to Toronto, I got better than 40 MPG.

Posted

as technology advances their is always a few bumps in the road....i remember reading that the direct injection in the suv's had bad carbon build up problems...but i'm sure by now they have fixed the problems...and alot of you folks make direct injection sound like carbs from the 70s lol

Posted

I am wondering if the next V6 engine for Silverado, will be based of the 3.6 or will it be based off the generation V small block V8? Maybe it will be based off the 6.2,like a 4.7. Just wondering, like hear from you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...