Jump to content

premium gas?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I would stay away from Ethanol!

 

The person who came up with using corn in fuel driving up food cost is a genius.

 

Thankfully where I live the stations do NOT have ethanol a proven engine destroyer.

 

What is the logic behind burning more fuel at a lower price and destroying engines with moisture, ect... ect...

 

I agree I do NOT nor will I shop at any Wall-China-Mart outfits, I have some dignity left in me to stop the hemorrhaging of jobs from going to CHINA.

 

Fuel like oil is not all the same!

Posted

Octane rating isn't an indicator of fuel quality. High octane gasoline resist detonation and is formulated for engines that run higher than normal compression and/or run with advanced timing. You will see no improvement in fuel mileage or performance if your engine is designed to run on regular gas. Motor fuels are refined at just a few refineries in the US and sent to various part of the country via pipelines. All brands generally come out of the same pipeline in your area. Distributors take this common fuel and blend in their specific additives near where the fuel is sold. Nearly everything you see and hear about one brand being superior to another is pure hype designed to influence motorist buying decisions.

Posted

Nearly everything you see and hear about one brand being superior to another is pure hype designed to influence motorist buying decisions.

 

 

All fuels must meet a government standard prior to being sold. Top Tier fuels generally have additives to prevent deposits from collecting in your engine. Many of these additives are proven to keep your engine clean and running well. Many people choose to get the cheapest fuel they can get, and add Techron every few thousand miles. I choose to do what GM says is best for my vehicle because I paid a lot of money for my truck, and I intend on keeping it for a long time. I can get Top Tier fuel with Techron for the same price as Wal-Mart so it is a no brainer.

Posted

I get my best mileage out of Mid (89) but it runs best on Premium.

For those that say it does nothing switch grades, what about when you use E85, how does it know the difference then or is there not any computer compensation for the change?

Posted

If you're getting married and have budget constraints then you should be running 87.

 

Can't make it any clearer then this....

 

I'm not on a tight budget and I run 89 in my 6.2, don't notice any difference with the 93. My trips are short and easy so I see no reason to run 93 reccomended or not......

Posted

Thanks for posting that link to the Top Tier fuel suppliers. I'm bummed that BP is not on the list. I usually always look for a BP thinking they were top tier. THe only other Top Tier supplier in my area is Exxon. Looks like they're getting my business from now on.

Posted

I think gas companies should be forced to stop calling higher octane fuel "premium". That word makes you think it is better. It is not better, it is just different. Same for "super".

Posted

I work for an oil company.

 

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE buy premium for your Chevy as it will mean I get a bigger bonus this year.

 

Which I'll tell you right now not a penny of it will go for premium fuel for my Avalanche.

 

All you're doing is putting money in MY pocket...unless you have a tune and have it tuned to the higher octane.

 

Or you're running a Volkwagen CC with 2.0 turbo in which case you have to run premium.

 

Otherwise, all you're doing is the old wealth redistribution the government does...from your pocket to mine.

 

;-)

Posted

As said above, find out what the compression ratio of your engine is, on my 6.2L and 5.7L engines it is 10.5:1 so I run "premiium fuel" (91 Octaine).

 

IMHO, if your compression ratio is < 9.5:1 I would use regular 87 Octaine fuel.

Posted

I get my best mileage out of Mid (89) but it runs best on Premium.

For those that say it does nothing switch grades, what about when you use E85, how does it know the difference then or is there not any computer compensation for the change?

 

 

I was thinking the same thing. The computer must change the ingnition timing to compensate for the different ignition point on E85 so why wouldnt it compensate for running premium?

Posted
I get my best mileage out of Mid (89) but it runs best on Premium. For those that say it does nothing switch grades, what about when you use E85, how does it know the difference then or is there not any computer compensation for the change?
I was thinking the same thing. The computer must change the ingnition timing to compensate for the different ignition point on E85 so why wouldnt it compensate for running premium?

 

It does!!!, the lower the octane of the gasoline, the more the timing is retarded. The higher the octane the timing is advanced.

Posted
I get my best mileage out of Mid (89) but it runs best on Premium. For those that say it does nothing switch grades, what about when you use E85, how does it know the difference then or is there not any computer compensation for the change?
I was thinking the same thing. The computer must change the ingnition timing to compensate for the different ignition point on E85 so why wouldnt it compensate for running premium?

 

It does!!!, the lower the octane of the gasoline, the more the timing is retarded. The higher the octane the timing is advanced.

 

You can see how much the timing is retarded by datalogging. I connected up the Trinity I have for the Challenger and did some datalogging on the Sierra this winter. Knock Retard was much more with 87 octane. There is still some Knock Retard even with 93. It would be worse in summer with higher ambient temperature.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I would like to know if I can increase my 2025 Silverado 2500 HD
    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...