Jump to content

Looking for a new or newer car


joshw1303

Recommended Posts

Posted

So my wife has an 06 Cobalt SS non S/C loaded and we want to upgrade to something bigger more room etc. So I have been test driving cars new Chrysler 200, Mazda 3 Chevy Cruze turbo. All see good cars. Want to know what others thoughts are as a good car in this class. We did enjoy the Cruze turbo but just looking for others ideas. We live in Canada so pricing is different.

Posted

my mom has a cruze with a 1.8 and its manual, its really an awesome car to drive, definatley not like the crap cars GM produced back in the day.

 

i dont know if the sonic is too small for you, but it got really good reviews and is suppoed to be awesome to drive

Posted

my mom has a cruze with a 1.8 and its manual, its really an awesome car to drive, definatley not like the crap cars GM produced back in the day.

 

i dont know if the sonic is too small for you, but it got really good reviews and is suppoed to be awesome to drive

 

 

I sat in the sonic and while its nice im 6 foot 2 and its cramped kinda inside. Might have to go look at the Cruze again. I test drove a Mazda 3 and yes let the hating begin. It was a very fun car to drive, very tight and is Zoom Zoom lol.

Posted

we have a 2009 Pontiac G6, with the 2.4L ecotech motor. Auto-manual trans where u can choose between manual or auto, Very roomy inside! great on gas average like 32+ mpg.

Posted

Just went to the autoshow the other day and looked at smaller rides. The wife and I liked the Hyundai Elantra. It had plenty of legroom up front and I'm 6'5.

Posted

my mom has a cruze with a 1.8 and its manual, its really an awesome car to drive, definatley not like the crap cars GM produced back in the day.

 

i dont know if the sonic is too small for you, but it got really good reviews and is suppoed to be awesome to drive

 

 

I sat in the sonic and while its nice im 6 foot 2 and its cramped kinda inside. Might have to go look at the Cruze again. I test drove a Mazda 3 and yes let the hating begin. It was a very fun car to drive, very tight and is Zoom Zoom lol.

 

 

im 6'0 and i fit in the cruze pretty good, its no truck but the front seats go back really far and i dont feel too cramped.

 

its really all about prefrence, you have to go test drive some small cars you like, and see which one you prefer

Posted

We just test drove a 2011 Ford Fusion SEL v6 pretty loaded. They are trying to move these vehicles due to over stocked. The Car retails for 35 G plus and they are selling it for 22,000G anyone ever buy over stock vehicles? Brand new warranty starts when if we buy. It has been sitting less a year be a year in April. Any tips?

Posted

Buying new the Cruze all the way. I've had a couple as rentals and think they're great.

Posted

Just went to the autoshow the other day and looked at smaller rides. The wife and I liked the Hyundai Elantra. It had plenty of legroom up front and I'm 6'5.

 

 

I recommend trying out the Elantra too. Wife and I were in the same boat in the summer, and after test driving and comparing a few....we chose the Elantra, so far a great car. No complaints what so ever.

Posted

Just went to the autoshow the other day and looked at smaller rides. The wife and I liked the Hyundai Elantra. It had plenty of legroom up front and I'm 6'5.

 

 

+1

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

We have a 2011 Malibu LTZ and love it. It didnt have an option for anything other than the 4cyl, but so far I am happy with it overall. Looks good and gets great mileage. The rebates were really awesome on it as well. You should look into it.

Posted

how was the chrysler 200? did you test the v6? we're looking too- and since chrysler is giving 3,000 back here in the states the 200S is a only a couple hundred more than a cruze ltz...and you get a 283 hp v6 instead of a 138 hp turbo4...you do take the mpg hit though, but im still curious. online the 200 looks a little more upscale too.

 

havent sat in a sonic yet, but at 18 grand fully loaded (i know- canada is different, what about crossing the border and purchasing?) its tempting. and fully loaded really is fully loaded, plus a 6 speed and the same turbo 4 so it shouldnt be too boring to drive.

Posted

I was extremely unimpressed with the Avenger, which is the same thing. It had the 4 cyl so obviously it wasn't powerful but that wasn't my main gripe with the car. It just didn't drive good and the interior still isn't as good as what GM, Ford and obviously the imports can pull off.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...