Jump to content

Ford Story


varmint2506

Recommended Posts

Posted

On the way to work this morning I came upon a ford explorer broke down in the middle of the road. The guy was trying to push it off the road into a driveway. The dude looked like he was going to give himself a hernia so I got out to give him a hand. I asked what he thought was wrong. He said he thought it had dropped the rear u-joint. I took a look under and sure enough the drive shaft was on the ground. I said dude, isn't this a 4x4. He said, yea! I said why not just put it in 4x4 and very gently pull it off the road. It looked like he had dragged the drive shaft a ways down the road so I figured what's a few more feet. Heck I've taken my old GMC Jimmy limping back to the barn many times on just the front end. :thumb:

 

 

I'll bet if you polled all the 4x4 owners here in the West End of Richmond, VA, you would find that probably a third of the people do not know whether there ride is a 4x4 or not, more or less how to use it. 4x4's are just a status symbol in that area.  :(

Posted
The Ford Expeditions and the Lincoln Navigators are the worst out there.

Yes they are.  I bleed Ford blue, but I despise the Expe/Navi platform.  They are too low and obese to be of any use off road.  They are expensive.  They are slow and lumbering.  They are ugly as s*%t.  And ####!  Can't people fold a seat by themselves anymore?  I could go on and on.  Many SUVs have become rediculous status symbols that are a disgrace to their roots and heritage.  Sorry for the rant...

Posted

I have to agree with Paco for once.  I've been screaming the same thing for years about the Expo and Navigator.  Who the heII needs power folding rear seats?  I could fold my Tahoe's rear seats and have the cargo area loaded before the ford had it's rear seats dropped!  Or power hidable running boards?  Or other slow useless features ford adds to their SUV's that in turn jack the pricetag.

 

Sorry, I guess I'm more form the old school of form follows function and simplicity.

Posted
Count me in with the old school as well.  A lot of the multi-purpose or utility vehicles have gotten soft over the years.  #### even my 92 Jimmy required some effort to fold the seat, etc.  Thanks mom...soccer mom that is.
Posted

At least he knew what a U-joint and a drive shaft were... :(

 

On the subject of poeple not knowing what they drive, a buddy of mine who worked at Pep-Boys has some good stories of people coming in and not only not knowing the year of the car, but having a hard time guessing the size of their engine when asked...  :cheers:

Posted

By the same token, the G/F's father and I went into Pep Boys cause he was looking for a driveshaft LOOP.  

 

The kid in back insisted that they had no driveshaft LUBE!  NO!!!  A DRIVESHAFT L-O-O-P!

 

He had no clue what one of those was.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...