Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know if it's been said in here but with regular gas I was getting roughly 14 mpg don't know the exact number. Then I put premium in and it bumped up to 16.1. I was very surprised

Posted (edited)

Premium OH MY GOSH that costs extra cash!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL I thought about it but right now I have been running a few tanks of nonethanol 87 octane. Now this last tank I filled up with 10% ethanol 87 octane. Next 3 to 4 tanks will be E85 I did not want to shock the trucks system with all that alcohol and get it drunked up so I am running a tank of 10% before I blast it with the E85. Might try some Premium fuel at some point but I am hoping that these new engine controllers can tune the engine to burn the E85 just as efficiently as the nonethanol fuel. In the past they have not been able to get nearly as good of gas mileage on the E85 it just sounds counter intuitive to me that the E85 produces more Horsepower but burns less efficiently but I never got goods grades is science in school so I guess I just do not have the needed mental capacity to understand that. Several trucks on the Fuelly site now so if they actually keep their data entered correctly we should be seeing real world results pretty soon.

Edited by MyFavTruck
Posted

Something of interest:

I record the gallons used, the odometer reading, and the trip computer’s mpg report. Given the vagaries of filling a gas tank to exactly the same level at each fill-up, some variability is understandable.

 

Mark Allen, GM’s director of global energy, mass, and aerodynamics, says some inaccuracy is unavoidable. “The density of fuel varies. We have no way to measure it. Mobil might be different than Shell. Summer gas to winter gas could be a big difference.” And then there are vapor-recovery systems. With modern cars’ sealed fuel tanks, gasoline vapor accumulated in the tank is absorbed by a charcoal-filled canister. Periodically, this canister is purged by the engine. “If the weather is hot, you generate lots of purge,” says Allen. “This unmetered fuel isn’t counted by the trip computer.”

Posted

 

 

First highway trip with the Denali 6.2:

 

IMG_20140222_131712_036.jpg

 

I have 34" tires and have not corrected the computer. Adjusting for the 7.4% error the actual numbers are 17.3 MPG at a 68 MPH average.

 

This was a round trip from the Seattle area to the top of Snoqualmie Pass (3000 ft elevation) and back again. The engine is still new (fewer than 300 total miles).

 

I'm pretty happy with that. It's rated at 20 for the highway, I've taken off the front airdam, lifted it 2" front, 1" rear, and put much bigger and heavier 34" tires on it.

 

IMG_20140222_110255_144.jpg

 

 

 

I repeated the same trip above. The truck now has about 1500 miles on it so it's a bit more broken in. I have also corrected the speedo for the tire size and I've disabled AFM completely.

 

IMG_20140309_134724_904.jpg

 

IMG_20140309_140443_076.jpg

 

IMG_20140309_140459_389.jpg

 

IMG_20140309_140511_692.jpg

 

IMG_20140309_140420_590.jpg

 

So without the AFM it got 18.1 on the same trip. I calculated by hand as well and it was within .05 MPG (although doing that for such short trips is not very accurate). The engine is a bit more broken in, but I'd say most of the gain was from the simple fact there was less traffic this time.

 

The 400 mile average has several weeks of city driving and since I only live 3 miles from work I only get about 11 MPG on that daily commute.

Posted

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

Posted (edited)

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

Any deep North boys noticing this?The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

Any deep North boys noticing this?

 

I almost agree with that statement but its doest get that cold here to much and ive had this problem since the first update which first week of Jan and weather here was pretty good. But I did find emission test from California that General Motors did on the truck and should after 4000 miles and 10 road test 2wd 5.3L 2014 Silverado 12.4mpg in the city on reg. And 17mpg on hwy. Am going upload the page later. And it shows the EPA at 16mpg in city 22mpg hwy but no testing info.

post-127624-0-18038400-1394437538_thumb.png

post-127624-0-18038400-1394437538_thumb.png

post-127624-0-18038400-1394437538_thumb.png

post-127624-0-18038400-1394437538_thumb.png

Edited by Ton J
Posted

I almost agree with that statement but its doest get that cold here to much and ive had this problem since the first update which first week of Jan and weather here was pretty good. But I did find emission test from California that General Motors did on the truck and should after 4000 miles and 10 road test 2wd 5.3L 2014 Silverado 12.4mpg in the city on reg. And 17mpg on hwy. Am going upload the page later. And it shows the EPA at 16mpg in city 22mpg hwy but no testing info.

 

What are those other test fuel types? I don't touch E85.

Posted

 

What are those other test fuel types? I don't touch E85.

All the test GM did on the Silverado an other trucks before release on the market. as you can see the results of the test. real world. here is the list trucks they by model. based California Emission test but it shouldn't matter because they have the toughest laws on this stuff

post-127624-0-97386500-1394462383_thumb.png

post-127624-0-97386500-1394462383_thumb.png

post-127624-0-97386500-1394462383_thumb.png

post-127624-0-97386500-1394462383_thumb.png

Posted

I almost agree with that statement but its doest get that cold here to much and ive had this problem since the first update which first week of Jan and weather here was pretty good. But I did find emission test from California that General Motors did on the truck and should after 4000 miles and 10 road test 2wd 5.3L 2014 Silverado 12.4mpg in the city on reg. And 17mpg on hwy. Am going upload the page later. And it shows the EPA at 16mpg in city 22mpg hwy but no testing info.

 

 

What are those other test fuel types? I don't touch E85.

Top 2 are E85

3 one is unleaded

bottom one are EPA standard that you see on the window.

Posted

 

Top 2 are E85

3 one is unleaded

bottom one are EPA standard that you see on the window.

Little more info

post-127624-0-27850300-1394463167_thumb.png

post-127624-0-27850300-1394463167_thumb.png

post-127624-0-27850300-1394463167_thumb.png

post-127624-0-27850300-1394463167_thumb.png

Posted

dealer called afm system was effected by updated and they said instead of using less Gas it's using more. And GM tech heads can't figure it out. Update did something to system.

Posted (edited)

I wish you were closer so I could get a copy of your calibration, then I could see how much different it is from mine. My MPG is everything that GM claims if I'm actually driving like an adult. It's hard to keep my foot out of it though since I started tuning.

 

It's good to hear that they are working on your issue, I hope you get it resolved in a timely manner. I would hate to see you down at the ford dealership because GM is dragging there feet.

Edited by iCryWheniGoPoop
Posted

I wish you were closer so I could get a copy of your calibration, then I could see how much different it is from mine. My MPG is everything that GM claims if I'm actually driving like an adult. It's hard to keep my foot out of it though since I started tuning.

 

It's good to hear that they are working on your issue, I hope you get it resolved in a timely manner. I would hate to see you down at the ford dealership because GM is dragging there feet.

You crazy as hell, Ill never buy a Ford. Ill stay with Chevy problems and all I just want it fixed. It was just fine when I first got it. Chevy to end man.

Posted

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

 

Exactly the same here. The other morning it was -12c or so, warmer than what weve been experiencing lately but same fuel economy as usual. It kept warming up to -5c and on my way home I beat my pathetic 50km record set on my second tank of fuel ever. Nice and warm today, just above melting, and I am probably using 25-30% less fuel than I ever have.

 

WFT is up with that? It's like a switch was flipped at -5c.

Posted

 

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

The last 2 days 90% city driving and I'm hitting 16 mpg. When I say city I talking 35 to 45 kph and lights every 1/4 to 1/2 mile. Same driving I always do...From 11 to 16. The only difference...TEMPERATURE! Instead of low 20th and high teens...it's was high 30s low 40s here in mid Michigan.

 

Any deep North boys noticing this?

 

Exactly the same here. The other morning it was -12c or so, warmer than what weve been experiencing lately but same fuel economy as usual. It kept warming up to -5c and on my way home I beat my pathetic 50km record set on my second tank of fuel ever. Nice and warm today, just above melting, and I am probably using 25-30% less fuel than I ever have.

 

WFT is up with that? It's like a switch was flipped at -5c.

 

EXACTLY! GM needs someone looking at this...even though the southern boys in this thread think we're nuts...this is a real issue in the cold!

 

Where is the GM service Rep? They seem to show up in every other cotton picking thread on this site?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,630 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...