Jump to content

2014+ Gas Mileage (MPG) Topic

BringTheRain403
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ton J Enthusiast

Ton J

Posted
Posted

They had me take it to another Dealer to check it out. They reprogramed it again they said there is a problem with the Active Fuel Management System the manager has one and he said his MPG has went down as well and customer are starting to come in and complaining. But I looked my truck up by VIN there was program issue before it left factory. This will make the 3rd time for reprogram now be understand if they have any problems when reprograming it can damage the ECM.

Service Manager told the AFM system is using more gas instead of less gas. So it comes down to the sensors now.

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Natek
Natek

I think if I was a salesmen I would research the products I would be selling. I wouldn't like it if a customer came in knowing more than me.

nibael
nibael

Mine gets pretty bad mileage at 180 mph. Maybe I should get a bed cover.

Eddie 70
Eddie 70

This was taken last week when I filled up. So far I have put this many miles on the truck. Hopefully it stays like this. We will see.  

Posted Images

strike1st Enthusiast

strike1st

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 19 mpg's was a 40 degree day on the highway 70 mph with a 30mph sustained gusting to 50mph tail wind.

Edited by strike1st
iCryWheniGoPoop Enthusiast

iCryWheniGoPoop

Posted
Posted

My dlc shows a max of 35.1 mpg on the 25 mile average which is useless if you ask me. I do get considerably better MPG than what is reported here though. I hope you guys get it lined out and get the same.

Ton J Enthusiast

Ton J

Posted
Posted

My dlc shows a max of 35.1 mpg on the 25 mile average which is useless if you ask me. I do get considerably better MPG than what is reported here though. I hope you guys get it lined out and get the same.

Its starting to become a big issue now that people are seeing for themselves now as well.

gone_fishing Enthusiast

gone_fishing

Posted
Posted

This is the best I've seen so far. I had the cruise set at 55mph with a good 20mph tail wind. This is not typical for me. I've been averaging 16-17mpg throughout this cold winter. Now that it has warmed up I've been seeing 20mpg on interstate. Hopefully see 22mpg when we are off winter fuel and back to normal temps.

post-124685-0-25223200-1395182921_thumb.jpg

post-124685-0-25223200-1395182921_thumb.jpg

post-124685-0-25223200-1395182921_thumb.jpg

post-124685-0-25223200-1395182921_thumb.jpg

2014GMC Enthusiast

2014GMC

Posted
Posted

Had 1.5 hours of highway drive time home today. Averaged 20 MPG for the last 50 miles. Or at least that's what the truck was showing.

Crew Cab 4x4 with the 6.2

70-75 mph, 55 degrees, pretty much flat interstate roads on I-10.

I'm pretty impressed!

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hootbro Enthusiast

Hootbro

Posted
Posted

Next time you do a fill-up, you may want to do a manual calculation and not trust the DIC reading. Many to include myself, have noticed the DIC MPG reporting to overstate by about 1 MPG higher than what it actually manually calculates out to.

WesternPa.gmc Enthusiast

WesternPa.gmc

Posted
Posted

Thats way better than i have averaged, but then again i'm driving up hills all day. haha I average about 16.5

mzodarg Senior Enthusiast

mzodarg

Posted
Posted

Just did a 230 mile day trip to OKC and back-10-15 mph head wind going up, 5mph tail coming home. Diablo 91 octane tune, had about 120 miles on the tune so fuel trims had learning time.

 

I average 19.5 MPG running 75-80 MPH DOD is disabled Best was 22.5. Diablo tune is better than stock, TCM could use more work along with torque management. Data logging this afternoon, so I can get the files off to Lew.

iCryWheniGoPoop Enthusiast

iCryWheniGoPoop

Posted
Posted

Next time you do a fill-up, you may want to do a manual calculation and not trust the DIC reading. Many to include myself, have noticed the DIC MPG reporting to overstate by about 1 MPG higher than what it actually manually calculates out to.

 

This is true, mine can read as much as 1mpg off but it can read high or low.

strike1st Enthusiast

strike1st

Posted
Posted

Next time you do a fill-up, you may want to do a manual calculation and not trust the DIC reading. Many to include myself, have noticed the DIC MPG reporting to overstate by about 1 MPG higher than what it actually manually calculates out to.

 

I'm doing a hand calc on this tank and from here on out...but if the DIC is showing 1 mpg better than I'm actually getting...holy wah...I'm screwed.

Dnt Senior Enthusiast

Dnt

Posted
Posted (edited)

Made a little trip up to KY yesterday about 500 miles overall. Running the E85 fuel now for a couple of tanks. It appears that it is not going to be as bad as I thought on the highway mileage. 2014 GMC Sierra CC SB SLT Z71 4x4 5.3 3.42 20" wheels. I will continue to buy the E85 I really like the feel of the increased HP and Torque it really messed up my first tank of E85 mpg my normally conservative driving was transformed into jack rabbit starts and tire barking. Now back to normal and mileage is just about right where the 10% ethanol 87 octane was at. Note I am tracking on the Fuelly site and it looks like the DIC is pretty accurate over the longer mileage ranges. I do not think the 25 and 50 ranges are far enough to be a true average but they are very good training guides for how to drive to get good overall fuel mileage if you pay attention.

Edited by MyFavTruck
Ton J Enthusiast

Ton J

Posted
Posted

I'm doing a hand calc on this tank and from here on out...but if the DIC is showing 1 mpg better than I'm actually getting...holy wah...I'm screwed.

You starting to see what am saying now. And I have been dealing with since the first update before fire recall

MD2014 Enthusiast

MD2014

Posted
Posted

Next time you do a fill-up, you may want to do a manual calculation and not trust the DIC reading. Many to include myself, have noticed the DIC MPG reporting to overstate by about 1 MPG higher than what it actually manually calculates out to.

I have been tracking my mileage since day one. My first two tanks were very close by hand. The next 5 or so fill ups have all been off by approx 1 mpg. The computer adds an extra mpg somewhere everytime.

 

Highway or city does not seem to matter as well.

 

Stock 6.2L 3.55 gears 4x4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 446 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...