Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
beasticles

Yes, brucelimerick post is a good source, no doubt. I am just a little cautious until I see what GM actually did under the truck. Right now it is a rusty mess, and it has been undercoated three times. My mother is a retired GM employee who worked with harnesses and she was not surprised when I told her about the parasitic drain with the e-brake bracket. She had the same issue when she had the truck but evidently the more miles I put on it the worse the issue became.

 

What really bothers me is GM will not step to the table. I do not believe there is little doubt inferior metal is the bulk of these issues. I have been a small block chevy and GM fan for many long years, but lately have drifted some. Dunno what to say, enough venting.

 

anyway waiting to hear how you do and wishing you well and safety. I wont be on mine for a few more weeks. Oh, I have a craftsman line set, but am purchasing another set similar to yours.

 

waiting to hear an update

 

Greasy

Posted

beasticles

 

anyway waiting to hear how you do and wishing you well and safety. I wont be on mine for a few more weeks. Oh, I have a craftsman line set, but am purchasing another set similar to yours.

 

waiting to hear an update

 

Greasy

 

 

Greasy - quick update for you -

 

I installed the new rear brake line (that runs from the top right port on the ABS to the splitter above the rear diff in the back). Another forum member posted in this thread: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/177718-best-way-to-remove-rear-brake-line-from-abs/page-2#entry1691258 thatthese AGS tube nuts are a perfect replacement for the ABS fittings - and he was correct: http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/american-grease-stick-co.-steel-tube-nut-5-per-card-1-4-in.-1-2-20-inverted-blf-44c-5/22190121-P . I actually could have salvaged my old fitting, but the new ones were a perfect fit (and at $2.50 for six nuts - why not!). I used a standard 1/4" tube and nut for the rear splitter - which I was able to source from Advance Auto as well.

 

As I mentioned in my prior post - I used EasyBend brake line from Amazon.com https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0027ABNUC/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s01?ie=UTF8&psc=1which worked great for my application - no issues with simply bending by hand. Having never flared brake line before - I practiced on short pieces of line Saturday night before tackling the job Sunday. I was able to get decent double flares on both ends of the line (obviously don't forget to have your tube nuts already on the line and facing the correct direction before flaring).

 

I had multiple flare nut wrench sets on hand - but in the end - due to the cramped space, I ended up using a small Craftsman 9/16" open-ended wrench to crack the ABS nut loose and remove (it was slow going as I had to turn it little by little due to the lack of clearance - damn you GM), and for the rear splitter I used a pipe cutter to snip the old line and was able to get a 1/2" (?) socket over the fitting to remove. The ABS fitting was on very tight as others have mentioned - and due to the lack of clearance I really had a heck of a time getting it to crack loose. It took all my strength with the small open-ended wrench to crack it loose - but once it is cracked - it will come off relatively easily.

 

I left the old line in place (it was rusted to hell and I didn't want to deal with removing it), and simply threaded the new EasyBend line along the top of the frame rail. I connected the line to the rear splitter first - then slowly threaded the line all the way up to where the ABS unit is. It's a little trick to get the tube nuts initially threaded into the ABS and the splitter, because the brake line is fighting you from "squaring" it up, but once you have the first thread in it snugs right up.

 

I still need to bleed my brakes tonight (was ready to retire for the night after getting the new line in) and check for leaks, but the hard part is now done! Timing wise I started around 5pm and finished around 7:30pm - just for removing the old line and getting the new line installed. Let me know if you have any questions. When my rear brake line started to weep I was doubting my ability to tackle this job, but it is certainly doable for the average shade tree.

 

Another tip - removing my spare tire made it much easier to move around the rear, deal with the rear splitter fitting, and feed the line up the frame rail from the back. It's not necessary but gives you a bit more space.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

Gonna revive this thread once again since I just tackled this project this past weekend on my 2003 Suburban 1500. I bought a pre-bent and flared kit of SS lines. I was able to fish the rear line through the rear driver side wheel well.. it was actually not the hardest line to run. I found a youtube video of a guy who showed how its done:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHwIEwTZjnI&t=8s

 

I had several slow leaks at the flares when I was done, which I was able to remedy with copper flare gaskets. 

 

Hope this helps.

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 11/5/2013 at 9:38 PM, brucelimerick said:

I have a 2001 and just finished replacing all the brake lines. I think they are the same, sure sounds like it. According to my thinking GM really did a poor job of engineering this whole mess. I am a little jaded as I have been dealing with the rear discs since the truck hit 21,000 miles. Rears eat pads, passenger side has to have new pads every 6 months. Pads and rotors once a year. Dealer suggested I shouldn't drive it on gravel roads, lol. A Gucci city boy truck? Stupid designers as far as I'm concerned. The only other complaint I have is no locking rear differential. Should be standard, this truck gets stuck in a flat parking lot in the snow.

Anyway I digress. The rear lines are conventional 3/16" after the splitter on the rear axle. The line running to the splitter is 1/4" line and a 1/4" fitting going into the splitter. Where this line goes into the ABS it is a 5/16" fitting taking a 1/4" line. The 2 lines coming from the master cylinder to the abs are 1/4" line with 5/16" fittings drilled out for 1/4" line. The 2 lines to the front cylinders are 1/4 " line with 1/4" fittings at the calipers and 5/16" fittings with 1/4" line at the ABS. You can't buy these lines. All the mechanics I talked to after making the assumption that the 1/4" line would have 1/4" fittings could buy the 5/16" fitting with the 1/4" bore and they made their own lines. I ended up getting 1/4" to 5/16" adapters for the connections to the ABS and ran 1/4" lines. The adapters are a problem, they have to have the small end on the 5/16" side. The big ended ones can be used on the master cylinder. The 5 on the ABS required me to phone and visit every automotive part store in 200 miles. Special orders resulted in the large wrench ends. You just can't fit 5 of them on the ABS and get your wrench on them to tighten them. I have the part number in my truck of the company that still makes the small ones. If you need it let me know. To replace the main line from the ABS to the rear splitter will require you to either drop the gas tank or remove the box. GM hides this line between the gas tank and the top of the frame rail. To remove the gas tank it is also recommended you remove the box first as well. Only 8 bolts and 2 torx screws holding the filler hose to the box. Basically it was a horror show. If your engine light is on it is also the time to replace the solenoid valve vent for the charcoal canister and the ring which holds your fuel pump in the tank should also be replaced.

In hindsight I would buy the 1/4 x 5/16 fittings and buy 1/4" Easybend line and make my own flares. The steel lines are junk, even with the "corrosion" coating on them. By the time you get finished bending and routing it there are scratches all over it. The lines at the ABS are a mess. It is jammed between the charcoal filter and the fuel filter. 5 lines have that have 4 to 5 bends in 6" and fit into a 1/2" by 4" space going over the frame and then come together to run up the outside of the frame. You can buy a pre-bent set of lines for about $280 but after doing the job I would think you would have to remove the box, cab and most of the front end to get them in.

The Easybend is real cool line. Copper nickel, truely corrosion resistant and bendable by hand. You can almost knot it and not kink it. Unfortunately I found out about it about half way through my job and it was too late to switch. You could run 3/16" steel line from the rear splitter to the rear calipers, plain Jane runs which can be redone easily to have to avoid buying a 25' coil of the easybend. The Easybend seemed to be about $50 for 25'. Cheap believe me. I have abs of steel crawling out from under my truck about 500 times fine tuning the bends on the steel lines. I ended up buying straight steel line with the fittings on them. You pretty much need fittings and joints on the steel lines. Pretty much impossible to run a full line the way GM routes them. And every joint is a potential leak point. The easybend will allow you to run the lines with no joints and just bend as you go by hand. I will NEVER run another steel line, ever!

 

If you want to really know if I'm bullshiting just crawl under the drivers door and have a look at the mess around the ABS on the inside of the frame. Also look at the line that heads to the rear, you can see about 18" and it is gone. The lines are run in the factory with the frame fully exposed and no body parts on. Every mechanic I talked to cursed this truck and most would want $1,000+ to do the job. I expect with a dealer you would be well on your way to $2k. Our dealer shop rate up here in Canada is $115/hr. The only one who was reasonable was the one who showed me the Easybend, he was still $75/hr but had the secret. Too bad I didn't visit him earlier. It would have saved me a week of cursing. I have pics start to finish if you need them. My brakes are great, well as great as GM made them, they have always required more effort than any other vehicle I ever owned.

Bruce

Tks Bruce, great info very detailed! I recently replaced some of my lines going to the front end as well and it was quite a chore, I hadn’t done it before but I’m a quick learner. I did gave to use the coated steel lines and bend as I go to make the routing with only one joint where it turns down to connect to the wheel caliper. Luckily for me, the connections at the ABS valve broke free pretty easily, I had to cut/re-flare line and reuse the 5/16 fittings tho as new ones were not available.
Found some leaks, at first was very concerned but some of the joints just needed more tightening luckily. It can become quite challenging especially around the ABS valve where space is very limited. On completion, I bled the system and got the brakes working decently however, my Brake System Needs Servicing light won’t go away. Is it just a computer reset issue or what? Would appreciate any feedback on this. Tks. 
 

 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 11/5/2013 at 8:38 PM, brucelimerick said:

Where this line goes into the ABS it is a 5/16" fitting taking a 1/4" line. The 2 lines coming from the master cylinder to the abs are 1/4" line with 5/16" fittings drilled out for 1/4" line.

Thank you for the information. Do you know what the thread pitch size is?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,873 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...